You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com> on 2003/01/28 19:09:25 UTC
IMPORTANT: Do not commit to v2.1 branch ...
... at least not until we talk about it, or v2.1.1 is tagged, whichever
comes first. :-)
I just committed Sergei's DNSServer changes to HEAD. I did *not* commit to
v2 branch, because I think that we should vote to put out v2.1.1, and then I
can apply Sergei's updates, and a couple of other fixes, to v2.1.2 for
release in a few weeks.
Vote coming up in another message.
--- Noel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: IMPORTANT: Do not commit to v2.1 branch ...
Posted by Serge Knystautas <se...@lokitech.com>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>
> But none of those DNS changes are in the v2.1 branch. None of them have
> been tested anywhere as far as I know, yet. Hence my thought to get out
the
> v2.1 branch, with the already tested updates, such as JavaMail, JAF, NNTP,
> and log rotation, and put the DNS changes into the next drop.
Thanks, I was reading the diff's on the changelog too quickly and thought
the DNS server changes were in the 2.1 branch too.
+1 from me for the freeze and release then.
Serge Knystautas
President
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 1.301.656.5501
e. sergek@lokitech.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: IMPORTANT: Do not commit to v2.1 branch ...
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
> Do you think the latest round of DNSServer changes are significant
> enough to push into a next-release? We already have DNSServer changes
> between the 2.1 release and now, so moving from what we had to 1.3.1 vs.
> 1.3.2 doesn't seem that significant to me.
But none of those DNS changes are in the v2.1 branch. None of them have
been tested anywhere as far as I know, yet. Hence my thought to get out the
v2.1 branch, with the already tested updates, such as JavaMail, JAF, NNTP,
and log rotation, and put the DNS changes into the next drop.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: IMPORTANT: Do not commit to v2.1 branch ...
Posted by Serge Knystautas <se...@lokitech.com>.
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> ... at least not until we talk about it, or v2.1.1 is tagged, whichever
> comes first. :-)
>
> I just committed Sergei's DNSServer changes to HEAD. I did *not* commit to
> v2 branch, because I think that we should vote to put out v2.1.1, and then I
> can apply Sergei's updates, and a couple of other fixes, to v2.1.2 for
> release in a few weeks.
Do you think the latest round of DNSServer changes are significant
enough to push into a next-release? We already have DNSServer changes
between the 2.1 release and now, so moving from what we had to 1.3.1 vs.
1.3.2 doesn't seem that significant to me.
--
Serge Knystautas
President
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e. sergek@lokitech.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>