You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> on 2006/07/10 19:20:15 UTC
Tuscany Overview Block Diagram
Hi,
This is a vague mental map of Tuscany and not what I wish to put in the
site. This is just to trigger some perspectives to the what we can present
in the site. The level of aggregation is pretty high in this diagram. I am
sure we can explode the blocks a little further or position them differently
to provide a better picture of Tuscany.
If not anything I hope to atleast correct what I am imagining of Tuscany :-)
Thanks.
Re: Tuscany Overview Block Diagram
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@thegoodsons.org.uk>.
This looks just the sort of thing I'd like to be presented with to begin
exploring the website. Thanks Venkata.
On 7/10/06, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This is a vague mental map of Tuscany and not what I wish to put in the
> site. This is just to trigger some perspectives to the what we can present
> in the site. The level of aggregation is pretty high in this diagram. I am
> sure we can explode the blocks a little further or position them differently
> to provide a better picture of Tuscany.
>
> If not anything I hope to atleast correct what I am imagining of Tuscany
> :-)
>
> Thanks.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
Kelvin Goodson
Re: Tuscany Overview Block Diagram
Posted by Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com>.
Hi... here is another representation that I could think of for Tuscany SCA.
This is a very rough one and the only intention is only to open up some
perspectives and not to overide any of the graphics that you guys have put
in place upto now. Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Venkat
On 7/22/06, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Agreed. One thing I think we need is a higher level diagram that puts the
> single SCA runtime into the context of a SCA based system containing
> remote
> references. There is something like this in the spec that shows a system
> with composites and a reference to a remote web service. Maybe we can put
> that at the top of the first page. I'll have a play and see how it looks.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Simon
>
> On 7/20/06, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Right Simon, I guess David's picture is the one we must go forward with.
> > Just that we must also give some thoughts to the 'distribution' and
> > 'integration' aspects and see how we can express this. Chek my prev.
> mail
> > on what I mean by this.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > - Venkat
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/20/06, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually I got a little confused here as we now have Davids top level
> > > diagram also. I have the source for that so I'll fiddle there a bit.
> > What
> > > I
> > > want to do is get the diagrams in some kind of possition in the new
> > > website
> > > layout so we can see where they fit and whether the diagrams are
> > > appropriate. The details of the diagrams can of course still be
> changed
> > > going forward.
> > >
> > > S
> > >
> > > On 7/20/06, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Venkata
> > > >
> > > > I'm just making some changes to the overview diagram so that it
> covers
> > > > more than Java. Do you have the original source. What app did you
> use?
> > > Am
> > > > just making changes in a bit editor at the mo so I remember what I
> > want
> > > but
> > > > would be good to do it properly.
> > > >
> > > > S
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 7/11/06, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Luciano,
> > > > >
> > > > > My sincere apologies. I left that out since I don't know much of
> > the
> > > > > DAS landscape in Tuscany. However, I have now included
> > that. Please
> > > let me
> > > > > what I have stated there sounds ok.
> > > > >
> > > > > Finally, I wish to again reiterate that the diagram that I have
> put
> > in
> > > > > is just to trigger some ideas to what we might ultimately host on
> > the
> > > > > web-site. For example I want to be able to position blocks that
> > > represent
> > > > > databindings, transport bindings and various containers. Right
> now
> > > all of
> > > > > it is bundled up.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > - Venkat
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/11/06, Luciano Resende < luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Looking at this, we are missing DAS component, that would be
> > well
> > > > > > represented as a parallel box (to the left) of SDO box. Could
> you
> > > > > > please add
> > > > > > that to the diagram you created ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 7/10/06, Venkata Krishnan < for.svkrish@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > This is a vague mental map of Tuscany and not what I wish
> to
> > > put
> > > > > > in the
> > > > > > > site. This is just to trigger some perspectives to the what
> we
> > > can
> > > > > > present
> > > > > > > in the site. The level of aggregation is pretty high in this
> > > > > > diagram. I am
> > > > > > > sure we can explode the blocks a little further or position
> them
> > > > > > differently
> > > > > > > to provide a better picture of Tuscany.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If not anything I hope to atleast correct what I am imagining
> of
> > > > > > Tuscany
> > > > > > > :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: Tuscany Overview Block Diagram
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
Agreed. One thing I think we need is a higher level diagram that puts the
single SCA runtime into the context of a SCA based system containing remote
references. There is something like this in the spec that shows a system
with composites and a reference to a remote web service. Maybe we can put
that at the top of the first page. I'll have a play and see how it looks.
Regards
Simon
On 7/20/06, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Right Simon, I guess David's picture is the one we must go forward with.
> Just that we must also give some thoughts to the 'distribution' and
> 'integration' aspects and see how we can express this. Chek my prev. mail
> on what I mean by this.
>
> Thanks
>
> - Venkat
>
>
>
> On 7/20/06, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Actually I got a little confused here as we now have Davids top level
> > diagram also. I have the source for that so I'll fiddle there a bit.
> What
> > I
> > want to do is get the diagrams in some kind of possition in the new
> > website
> > layout so we can see where they fit and whether the diagrams are
> > appropriate. The details of the diagrams can of course still be changed
> > going forward.
> >
> > S
> >
> > On 7/20/06, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Venkata
> > >
> > > I'm just making some changes to the overview diagram so that it covers
> > > more than Java. Do you have the original source. What app did you use?
> > Am
> > > just making changes in a bit editor at the mo so I remember what I
> want
> > but
> > > would be good to do it properly.
> > >
> > > S
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/11/06, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Luciano,
> > > >
> > > > My sincere apologies. I left that out since I don't know much of
> the
> > > > DAS landscape in Tuscany. However, I have now included
> that. Please
> > let me
> > > > what I have stated there sounds ok.
> > > >
> > > > Finally, I wish to again reiterate that the diagram that I have put
> in
> > > > is just to trigger some ideas to what we might ultimately host on
> the
> > > > web-site. For example I want to be able to position blocks that
> > represent
> > > > databindings, transport bindings and various containers. Right now
> > all of
> > > > it is bundled up.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > - Venkat
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 7/11/06, Luciano Resende < luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > Looking at this, we are missing DAS component, that would be
> well
> > > > > represented as a parallel box (to the left) of SDO box. Could you
> > > > > please add
> > > > > that to the diagram you created ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 7/10/06, Venkata Krishnan < for.svkrish@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > This is a vague mental map of Tuscany and not what I wish to
> > put
> > > > > in the
> > > > > > site. This is just to trigger some perspectives to the what we
> > can
> > > > > present
> > > > > > in the site. The level of aggregation is pretty high in this
> > > > > diagram. I am
> > > > > > sure we can explode the blocks a little further or position them
> > > > > differently
> > > > > > to provide a better picture of Tuscany.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If not anything I hope to atleast correct what I am imagining of
> > > > > Tuscany
> > > > > > :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: Tuscany Overview Block Diagram
Posted by Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com>.
Right Simon, I guess David's picture is the one we must go forward with.
Just that we must also give some thoughts to the 'distribution' and
'integration' aspects and see how we can express this. Chek my prev. mail
on what I mean by this.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 7/20/06, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Actually I got a little confused here as we now have Davids top level
> diagram also. I have the source for that so I'll fiddle there a bit. What
> I
> want to do is get the diagrams in some kind of possition in the new
> website
> layout so we can see where they fit and whether the diagrams are
> appropriate. The details of the diagrams can of course still be changed
> going forward.
>
> S
>
> On 7/20/06, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Venkata
> >
> > I'm just making some changes to the overview diagram so that it covers
> > more than Java. Do you have the original source. What app did you use?
> Am
> > just making changes in a bit editor at the mo so I remember what I want
> but
> > would be good to do it properly.
> >
> > S
> >
> >
> > On 7/11/06, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Luciano,
> > >
> > > My sincere apologies. I left that out since I don't know much of the
> > > DAS landscape in Tuscany. However, I have now included that. Please
> let me
> > > what I have stated there sounds ok.
> > >
> > > Finally, I wish to again reiterate that the diagram that I have put in
> > > is just to trigger some ideas to what we might ultimately host on the
> > > web-site. For example I want to be able to position blocks that
> represent
> > > databindings, transport bindings and various containers. Right now
> all of
> > > it is bundled up.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > - Venkat
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/11/06, Luciano Resende < luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Looking at this, we are missing DAS component, that would be well
> > > > represented as a parallel box (to the left) of SDO box. Could you
> > > > please add
> > > > that to the diagram you created ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 7/10/06, Venkata Krishnan < for.svkrish@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > This is a vague mental map of Tuscany and not what I wish to
> put
> > > > in the
> > > > > site. This is just to trigger some perspectives to the what we
> can
> > > > present
> > > > > in the site. The level of aggregation is pretty high in this
> > > > diagram. I am
> > > > > sure we can explode the blocks a little further or position them
> > > > differently
> > > > > to provide a better picture of Tuscany.
> > > > >
> > > > > If not anything I hope to atleast correct what I am imagining of
> > > > Tuscany
> > > > > :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: Tuscany Overview Block Diagram
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
Actually I got a little confused here as we now have Davids top level
diagram also. I have the source for that so I'll fiddle there a bit. What I
want to do is get the diagrams in some kind of possition in the new website
layout so we can see where they fit and whether the diagrams are
appropriate. The details of the diagrams can of course still be changed
going forward.
S
On 7/20/06, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Venkata
>
> I'm just making some changes to the overview diagram so that it covers
> more than Java. Do you have the original source. What app did you use? Am
> just making changes in a bit editor at the mo so I remember what I want but
> would be good to do it properly.
>
> S
>
>
> On 7/11/06, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Luciano,
> >
> > My sincere apologies. I left that out since I don't know much of the
> > DAS landscape in Tuscany. However, I have now included that. Please let me
> > what I have stated there sounds ok.
> >
> > Finally, I wish to again reiterate that the diagram that I have put in
> > is just to trigger some ideas to what we might ultimately host on the
> > web-site. For example I want to be able to position blocks that represent
> > databindings, transport bindings and various containers. Right now all of
> > it is bundled up.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > - Venkat
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/11/06, Luciano Resende < luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Looking at this, we are missing DAS component, that would be well
> > > represented as a parallel box (to the left) of SDO box. Could you
> > > please add
> > > that to the diagram you created ?
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/10/06, Venkata Krishnan < for.svkrish@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > This is a vague mental map of Tuscany and not what I wish to put
> > > in the
> > > > site. This is just to trigger some perspectives to the what we can
> > > present
> > > > in the site. The level of aggregation is pretty high in this
> > > diagram. I am
> > > > sure we can explode the blocks a little further or position them
> > > differently
> > > > to provide a better picture of Tuscany.
> > > >
> > > > If not anything I hope to atleast correct what I am imagining of
> > > Tuscany
> > > > :-)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Luciano Resende
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: Tuscany Overview Block Diagram
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Venkata
I'm just making some changes to the overview diagram so that it covers more
than Java. Do you have the original source. What app did you use? Am just
making changes in a bit editor at the mo so I remember what I want but would
be good to do it properly.
S
On 7/11/06, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Luciano,
>
> My sincere apologies. I left that out since I don't know much of the DAS
> landscape in Tuscany. However, I have now included that. Please let me
> what I have stated there sounds ok.
>
> Finally, I wish to again reiterate that the diagram that I have put in is
> just to trigger some ideas to what we might ultimately host on the
> web-site. For example I want to be able to position blocks that represent
> databindings, transport bindings and various containers. Right now all of
> it is bundled up.
>
> Thanks
>
> - Venkat
>
>
>
> On 7/11/06, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Looking at this, we are missing DAS component, that would be well
> > represented as a parallel box (to the left) of SDO box. Could you please
> > add
> > that to the diagram you created ?
> >
> >
> > On 7/10/06, Venkata Krishnan < for.svkrish@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > This is a vague mental map of Tuscany and not what I wish to put in
> > the
> > > site. This is just to trigger some perspectives to the what we can
> > present
> > > in the site. The level of aggregation is pretty high in this
> > diagram. I am
> > > sure we can explode the blocks a little further or position them
> > differently
> > > to provide a better picture of Tuscany.
> > >
> > > If not anything I hope to atleast correct what I am imagining of
> > Tuscany
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards
> >
> > Luciano Resende
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
Re: Tuscany Overview Block Diagram
Posted by Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com>.
Luciano,
My sincere apologies. I left that out since I don't know much of the DAS
landscape in Tuscany. However, I have now included that. Please let me
what I have stated there sounds ok.
Finally, I wish to again reiterate that the diagram that I have put in is
just to trigger some ideas to what we might ultimately host on the
web-site. For example I want to be able to position blocks that represent
databindings, transport bindings and various containers. Right now all of
it is bundled up.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 7/11/06, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Looking at this, we are missing DAS component, that would be well
> represented as a parallel box (to the left) of SDO box. Could you please
> add
> that to the diagram you created ?
>
>
> On 7/10/06, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > This is a vague mental map of Tuscany and not what I wish to put in
> the
> > site. This is just to trigger some perspectives to the what we can
> present
> > in the site. The level of aggregation is pretty high in this
> diagram. I am
> > sure we can explode the blocks a little further or position them
> differently
> > to provide a better picture of Tuscany.
> >
> > If not anything I hope to atleast correct what I am imagining of Tuscany
> > :-)
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards
>
> Luciano Resende
>
>
Re: Tuscany Overview Block Diagram
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Looking at this, we are missing DAS component, that would be well
represented as a parallel box (to the left) of SDO box. Could you please add
that to the diagram you created ?
On 7/10/06, Venkata Krishnan <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This is a vague mental map of Tuscany and not what I wish to put in the
> site. This is just to trigger some perspectives to the what we can present
> in the site. The level of aggregation is pretty high in this diagram. I am
> sure we can explode the blocks a little further or position them differently
> to provide a better picture of Tuscany.
>
> If not anything I hope to atleast correct what I am imagining of Tuscany
> :-)
>
> Thanks.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
>
--
Regards
Luciano Resende