[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-7160) Improve IdLock and remove its minor defects

["Andrew Kyle Purtell (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andrew Kyle Purtell resolved HBASE-7160.
----------------------------------------
    Resolution: Abandoned

> Improve IdLock and remove its minor defects
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-7160
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7160
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Hiroshi Ikeda
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HBASE-7160-V2.patch, HBASE-7160-V3.patch, HBASE-7160-V4.patch, HBASE-7160.patch
>
>
> Combination of synchronizations and concurrent collections complicates the code, and it is hard to trace the code and to confirm its correctness. We should re-create the class and make it more understandable.
> In the current code, I find the following minor defects:
> (1) In the case that there is a waiting thread for a lock in getLockEntry() and another thread is releasing the lock by calling releaseLockEntry(), trying to get the lock with a 3rd thread by calling getLockEntry() falls into a busy loop until the waiting thread wakes up and gets the lock.
> Even if notify() wakes up the blocked thread and causes a context switch to the waked thread immediately, synchronization might block the waked thread and cause another context switch, and the busy loop might continue for a while.
> (2) In the same case as (1), since releasing the lock is merely notifying without removing the lock-entry from the map, interrupting the waiting thread might leave an unused lock-entry (entry.numWaiters == 0) in the map. This is a memory leak unless the id of the lock is used again.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)