You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by Brian Taylor <br...@briantaylor.us> on 2009/08/12 19:29:06 UTC
CXF SE: Concrete WSDL Generation?
Hello,
Is the CXF SE supposed to be generating concrete WSDLs? I though Service
Engines were supposed to operate form Abstract WSDLs and Binding Components
Concrete WSDLs?
Respectfully,
Brian
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-SE%3A-Concrete-WSDL-Generation--tp24941252p24941252.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: CXF SE: Concrete WSDL Generation?
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
No, I don't think so
On 2009-8-14, at 上午2:41, Brian Taylor wrote:
>
> Will having a 'default physical part with a default address' affect
> importing
> it into a concrete wsdl?
>
>
> Freeman Fang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2009-8-13, at 上午1:29, Brian Taylor wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Is the CXF SE supposed to be generating concrete WSDLs?
>>
>> No, but wsdl generated from cxf se can have a default physical part
>> with a default address, but it's useless at all.
>>> I though Service
>>> Engines were supposed to operate form Abstract WSDLs and Binding
>>> Components
>>> Concrete WSDLs?
>> Yes
>>>
>>> Respectfully,
>>> Brian
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/CXF-SE%3A-Concrete-WSDL-Generation--tp24941252p24941252.html
>>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Freeman Fang
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-SE%3A-Concrete-WSDL-Generation--tp24941252p24956595.html
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Freeman Fang
------------------------
Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
Re: CXF SE: Concrete WSDL Generation?
Posted by Brian Taylor <br...@briantaylor.us>.
Will having a 'default physical part with a default address' affect importing
it into a concrete wsdl?
Freeman Fang wrote:
>
>
> On 2009-8-13, at 上午1:29, Brian Taylor wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is the CXF SE supposed to be generating concrete WSDLs?
>
> No, but wsdl generated from cxf se can have a default physical part
> with a default address, but it's useless at all.
>> I though Service
>> Engines were supposed to operate form Abstract WSDLs and Binding
>> Components
>> Concrete WSDLs?
> Yes
>>
>> Respectfully,
>> Brian
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/CXF-SE%3A-Concrete-WSDL-Generation--tp24941252p24941252.html
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
> --
> Freeman Fang
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-SE%3A-Concrete-WSDL-Generation--tp24941252p24956595.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: CXF SE: Concrete WSDL Generation?
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
On 2009-8-13, at 上午1:29, Brian Taylor wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is the CXF SE supposed to be generating concrete WSDLs?
No, but wsdl generated from cxf se can have a default physical part
with a default address, but it's useless at all.
> I though Service
> Engines were supposed to operate form Abstract WSDLs and Binding
> Components
> Concrete WSDLs?
Yes
>
> Respectfully,
> Brian
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-SE%3A-Concrete-WSDL-Generation--tp24941252p24941252.html
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Freeman Fang
------------------------
Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com