[jira] [Updated] (TS-1340) It's very unclear that one needs to list ipv4 and ipv6 ports separately in records.config

["Jan-Frode Myklebust (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jan-Frode Myklebust updated TS-1340:
------------------------------------

    Attachment: 0001-Document-the-common-use-case-of-running-a-reverse-pr.patch

Give example of the common use-case of listening on port 80 and 443 for ipv4 and ipv6.
                
> It's very unclear that one needs to list ipv4 and ipv6 ports separately in records.config
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-1340
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1340
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Configuration
>            Reporter: Jan-Frode Myklebust
>            Priority: Trivial
>         Attachments: 0001-Document-the-common-use-case-of-running-a-reverse-pr.patch
>
>
> The default records.config should document that one needs to list separate server_ports port configuring ipv4 and ipv6 to get it to listen on both protocols, and not simply list 80:ipv4:ipv6 which the current documentation seems to indicate. I'll attach a patch that gives an example of this for proxy/config/records.config.default.in. Please apply,

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira