You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@lucene.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/08/19 20:31:29 UTC

[GitHub] [lucene-solr] slackhappy commented on a change in pull request #1436: SOLR-14413: allow timeAllowed and cursorMark parameters

slackhappy commented on a change in pull request #1436:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1436#discussion_r473300877



##########
File path: solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/CursorPagingTest.java
##########
@@ -499,6 +492,61 @@ public void testSimple() throws Exception {
                               ));
   }
 
+  /**
+   * test that timeAllowed parameter can be used with cursors
+   * uses DelayingSearchComponent in solrconfig-deeppaging.xml
+   */
+  public void testTimeAllowed() throws Exception {
+    String wontExceedTimeout = "10000";
+    int numDocs = 100;
+    // Create a bunch of docs, inspired by createIndex in ExitableDirectoryReaderTest
+    for (int i = 0; i < numDocs; i++) {
+      assertU(adoc("id", Integer.toString(i), "name", "a" + i + " b" + i + " c" + i + " d"+i + " e" + i));

Review comment:
       great point, I'll use ExitableDirectoryReaderTest.createIndex directly.  In my testing, it seemed to be useful to use the higher complexity prefix search to have a better guarantee of triggering partialResults with timeAllowed.  I suspect that is what ExitableDirectoryReaderTest to use that strategy, but to your point, `"a" + i` would be sufficient.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org