You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Alexander Klimetschek (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/02/10 15:16:27 UTC

[jira] Commented: (JCR-1438) Replace Config classes with factories

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12831998#action_12831998 ] 

Alexander Klimetschek commented on JCR-1438:
--------------------------------------------

Allowing OSGi services to be used as implementations for the various repository modules should also be considered.

> Replace Config classes with factories
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1438
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1438
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: config, jackrabbit-core
>            Reporter: Jukka Zitting
>            Assignee: Jukka Zitting
>
> Jackrabbit is currently tightly coupled to the configuration classes in o.a.j.core.config.
> To make alternative configuration mechanisms easier to implement, I'd like to introduce a set of factory interfaces for instantiating various components like FileSystems, AccessManagers, etc. The current Config classes would implement these factory interfaces, but this way the rest of the Jackrabbit codebase would no longer be tied to just one configuration mechanism.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.