You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Dag H. Wanvik" <Da...@Sun.COM> on 2006/08/11 16:59:14 UTC

build broken for JDBC4?

Is anyone else seeing this?

compile_jdbc4:
    [javac] Compiling 21 source files to /home/dw136774/derby/trunk/classes
    [javac] /home/dw136774/derby/trunk/java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/jdbc4/JDBC40TranslationTest.java:39: cannot find symbol
    [javac] symbol  : variable functionParameterUnknown
    [javac] location: interface java.sql.DatabaseMetaData
    [javac]         assertEquals(DatabaseMetaData.functionParameterUnknown,

If I modify my ant.properties to compile without jdk16, I get no errors.

I am using jdk16 b95.

> svn info
Path: .
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/derby/code/trunk
Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Revision: 430788
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: suresht
Last Changed Rev: 430714
Last Changed Date: 2006-08-11 09:51:11 +0200 (Fri, 11 Aug 2006)
Properties Last Updated: 2006-08-09 00:58:00 +0200 (Wed, 09 Aug 2006)

Re: build broken for JDBC4?

Posted by Rick Hillegas <Ri...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Dan,

It's my understanding that build 95 carries the last signature changes 
for the JDBC4 spec. A tiny amount of javadoc polishing may still happen. 
So, barring some serious problem raised by Mustang testing, build 95 
matches the JDBC4 spec that we're aiming at. Mustang does not go GA 
until the end of October. Between now and then I would expect a couple 
more builds--but not many.

Regards,
-Rick

Daniel John Debrunner wrote:

>Rick Hillegas wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hi Dag,
>>
>>This is DERBY-1530, for which I prepared a patch a week and a half ago.
>>I am working on reapplying and testing this patch now that build 95 has
>>gone public. Until I commit this work, please use an earlier version of
>>Mustang.
>>    
>>
>
>Is build 95 the version that matches the JDBC 4 spec version we are
>aiming at, i.e. the public final draft? Or will that be a later mustang
>build and if so is there any timeframe on it?
>
>Dan.
>
>  
>

Re: build broken for JDBC4?

Posted by Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org>.
Rick Hillegas wrote:

> Hi Dag,
> 
> This is DERBY-1530, for which I prepared a patch a week and a half ago.
> I am working on reapplying and testing this patch now that build 95 has
> gone public. Until I commit this work, please use an earlier version of
> Mustang.

Is build 95 the version that matches the JDBC 4 spec version we are
aiming at, i.e. the public final draft? Or will that be a later mustang
build and if so is there any timeframe on it?

Dan.

Re: build broken for JDBC4?

Posted by Rick Hillegas <Ri...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Dag,

This is DERBY-1530, for which I prepared a patch a week and a half ago. 
I am working on reapplying and testing this patch now that build 95 has 
gone public. Until I commit this work, please use an earlier version of 
Mustang.

Regards,
-Rick

Dag H. Wanvik wrote:

>Is anyone else seeing this?
>
>compile_jdbc4:
>    [javac] Compiling 21 source files to /home/dw136774/derby/trunk/classes
>    [javac] /home/dw136774/derby/trunk/java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/jdbc4/JDBC40TranslationTest.java:39: cannot find symbol
>    [javac] symbol  : variable functionParameterUnknown
>    [javac] location: interface java.sql.DatabaseMetaData
>    [javac]         assertEquals(DatabaseMetaData.functionParameterUnknown,
>
>If I modify my ant.properties to compile without jdk16, I get no errors.
>
>I am using jdk16 b95.
>
>  
>
>>svn info
>>    
>>
>Path: .
>URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/derby/code/trunk
>Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
>Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
>Revision: 430788
>Node Kind: directory
>Schedule: normal
>Last Changed Author: suresht
>Last Changed Rev: 430714
>Last Changed Date: 2006-08-11 09:51:11 +0200 (Fri, 11 Aug 2006)
>Properties Last Updated: 2006-08-09 00:58:00 +0200 (Wed, 09 Aug 2006)
>  
>