You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@netbeans.apache.org by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com> on 2017/11/13 09:57:29 UTC
[mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha
Hi all,
In the vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f02d0ea43e506c919cb5621e374acbd3abadc2ac050740d786d0bd68@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E
There are many +1s.
In the meantime, the various items have been discussed and fixed.
Do we need to have a new vote thread for the PPMC? Or do we go directly to
the IPMC at this point? I.e., must a vote thread be restarted at the PPMC
or started from scratch at the IPMC?
Thanks,
Geertjan
Re: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>.
Yes, OK, let's not waste time on voting on whether there should be another
vote. :-)
Clearly, a new vote thread is needed.
Gj
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>
wrote:
> +1 again.
>
> Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
>
> Von: Mark Struberg
> Gesendet: Montag, 13. November 2017 13:16
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha
>
> +1 to re-roll the realease after the stuff Ate catched got fixed.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 13.11.2017 um 13:11 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacretaz@apache.org>:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> > <ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> ...Do we need to list the items that came up in the first vote, in the
> 2nd
> >> vote thread, together with how those items were resolved?..
> >
> > Yes it's good to indicate that concerns have been resolved.
> >
> > A new vote thread is needed anyway every time something's changed in
> > the release - votes are valid for a specific release archive only,
> > ideally identified by its digest.
> >
> > -Bertrand
>
>
>
AW: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha
Posted by Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>.
+1 again.
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: Mark Struberg
Gesendet: Montag, 13. November 2017 13:16
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha
+1 to re-roll the realease after the stuff Ate catched got fixed.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 13.11.2017 um 13:11 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>:
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> ...Do we need to list the items that came up in the first vote, in the 2nd
>> vote thread, together with how those items were resolved?..
>
> Yes it's good to indicate that concerns have been resolved.
>
> A new vote thread is needed anyway every time something's changed in
> the release - votes are valid for a specific release archive only,
> ideally identified by its digest.
>
> -Bertrand
Re: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
+1 to re-roll the realease after the stuff Ate catched got fixed.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 13.11.2017 um 13:11 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>:
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> ...Do we need to list the items that came up in the first vote, in the 2nd
>> vote thread, together with how those items were resolved?..
>
> Yes it's good to indicate that concerns have been resolved.
>
> A new vote thread is needed anyway every time something's changed in
> the release - votes are valid for a specific release archive only,
> ideally identified by its digest.
>
> -Bertrand
Re: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
<ge...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> ...Do we need to list the items that came up in the first vote, in the 2nd
> vote thread, together with how those items were resolved?..
Yes it's good to indicate that concerns have been resolved.
A new vote thread is needed anyway every time something's changed in
the release - votes are valid for a specific release archive only,
ideally identified by its digest.
-Bertrand
Re: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>.
OK, that means, since there were one or two -1 on the dev@ list, we’ll need
to start a new vote thread there.
Do we need to list the items that came up in the first vote, in the 2nd
vote thread, together with how those items were resolved?
Gj
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 11:02, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 11/13/2017 10:57 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In the vote thread:
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f02d0ea43e506c919cb5621e374acbd3abadc2ac050740d786d0bd68@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E
> >
> > There are many +1s.
> >
> > In the meantime, the various items have been discussed and fixed.
> >
> > Do we need to have a new vote thread for the PPMC? Or do we go directly
> to
> > the IPMC at this point? I.e., must a vote thread be restarted at the PPMC
> > or started from scratch at the IPMC?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Geertjan
> >
>
> First you vote on the dev@ list. If that gets approved, you carry that
> over to a new vote on general@incubator where only IPMC votes count.
> IPMC members that have voted in the original vote on dev@ count towards
> the 3x+1 you need on general@incubator.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
>
Re: [mentors] Next Steps: Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha
Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.
On 11/13/2017 10:57 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the vote thread:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f02d0ea43e506c919cb5621e374acbd3abadc2ac050740d786d0bd68@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E
>
> There are many +1s.
>
> In the meantime, the various items have been discussed and fixed.
>
> Do we need to have a new vote thread for the PPMC? Or do we go directly to
> the IPMC at this point? I.e., must a vote thread be restarted at the PPMC
> or started from scratch at the IPMC?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Geertjan
>
First you vote on the dev@ list. If that gets approved, you carry that
over to a new vote on general@incubator where only IPMC votes count.
IPMC members that have voted in the original vote on dev@ count towards
the 3x+1 you need on general@incubator.
With regards,
Daniel.