[jira] [Updated] (FINERACT-1175) Fix spm.repository / spm.domain JPA bug (?), and simplify appContext.xml

["Michael Vorburger (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Michael Vorburger updated FINERACT-1175:
----------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 1.5.0

> Fix spm.repository / spm.domain JPA bug (?), and simplify appContext.xml
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FINERACT-1175
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1175
>             Project: Apache Fineract
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael Vorburger
>            Assignee: Michael Vorburger
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> While I was working on FINERACT-1127, I've noticed that appContext.xml individually lists 10+ packages.. why not just use org.apache.fineract.** ?
> There is also a fineract-provider/src/main/resources/META-INF/spring/spmContext.xml, which seems weird.. why is that, and only that, in a separate file, instead of listed in appContext.xml? Would seem more consistent to have all in one.
> Most importantly, perhaps, the {{<jpa:repositories base-package="org.apache.fineract.spm.repository"/>}} in spmContext.xml seems inconsistent with appContext.xml.. shouldn't that be {{org.apache.fineract.spm.domain}}, instead? Or are the other ones wrong? (And this is another reason why having them all together in a single place seems easier, to see differences.)
> [~ptuomola] [~aleks] do you perhaps have any thoughts about this?
> [~xurror] ([~kaze] ?) I'm not sure if this is something that particularly interests you, in the context of the OpenJPA to EclipseLink migration, but I thought I would just mention it here FYI, and on the off chance that this is causing you any issues during that project.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)