You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@santuario.apache.org by Raul Benito <ra...@apache.org> on 2007/04/25 11:33:31 UTC
[VOTE] 1.4.1 Release
I haven't recived any bad thing about 1.4.1 releas (ok, I have only receive
only one ok but that is enought)
What do you think of changing the name of 1.4.1Beta1 into 1.4.1 release?
[ ] +1 We have all the test we need
[ ] 0 Perhaps we should wait for more people say ok
[ ] -1
Regards,
Raul
--
http://r-bg.com
Re: [VOTE] 1.4.1 Release
Posted by Wolfgang Glas <wo...@ev-i.at>.
Raul Benito wrote:
> Raise a enhancement bug into http://issues.apache.org, And we can consider
> it.
Sorry, I haven't been aware of this site. I will file an issue there.
Regards,
Wolfgang
Re: [VOTE] 1.4.1 Release
Posted by Raul Benito <ra...@apache.org>.
Raise a enhancement bug into http://issues.apache.org, And we can consider
it.
Regards,
Raul
On 4/25/07, Wolfgang Glas <wo...@ev-i.at> wrote:
>
> Raul Benito wrote:
> > I haven't recived any bad thing about 1.4.1 releas (ok, I have only
> receive
> > only one ok but that is enought)
> > What do you think of changing the name of 1.4.1Beta1 into 1.4.1release?
> > [ ] +1 We have all the test we need
> > [ ] 0 Perhaps we should wait for more people say ok
> > [ ] -1
>
> Would it be possible to integrate my ECDSA interoperability patch into
> 1.4.1?
> It works well for my signatures created with austrian citizen cards and
> the authors of the specification of the austrian citizen card
> environment are also co-authors of RFC4050 and RFC 4051, which target
> the ECDSA signature value encoding inside xml-signatures.
>
> Regards,
>
> Wolfgang
>
--
http://r-bg.com
Re: [VOTE] 1.4.1 Release
Posted by Wolfgang Glas <wo...@ev-i.at>.
Raul Benito wrote:
> I haven't recived any bad thing about 1.4.1 releas (ok, I have only receive
> only one ok but that is enought)
> What do you think of changing the name of 1.4.1Beta1 into 1.4.1 release?
> [ ] +1 We have all the test we need
> [ ] 0 Perhaps we should wait for more people say ok
> [ ] -1
Would it be possible to integrate my ECDSA interoperability patch into
1.4.1?
It works well for my signatures created with austrian citizen cards and
the authors of the specification of the austrian citizen card
environment are also co-authors of RFC4050 and RFC 4051, which target
the ECDSA signature value encoding inside xml-signatures.
Regards,
Wolfgang
Re: [VOTE] 1.4.1 Release
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 4/25/07, Raul Benito <ra...@apache.org> wrote:
> I haven't recived any bad thing about 1.4.1 releas (ok, I have only receive
> only one ok but that is enought)
> What do you think of changing the name of 1.4.1Beta1 into 1.4.1 release?
> [ ] +1 We have all the test we need
> [ ] 0 Perhaps we should wait for more people say ok
> [ ] -1
>
> Regards,
>
> Raul
>
> --
> http://r-bg.com
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers