You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org by "Robert D. Morse" <rm...@mdesignz.com> on 2006/10/12 19:49:06 UTC
New Project Question
Coming from the Struts world for the last couple of years, I began
looking at MyFaces, Tiles and Tomahawk. I created a small project
using these components, when I came across Trinidad (ADF Faces) and
this mail list a couple of days ago. It seems at first glance that I
should migrate this project (and future projects) to Trinidad since
it seems to have a greater number of components, and Tomahawk
components can be added with little effort. Is this a fair
assessment? Any reasons not to take this approach? My apologies for
the newbie question.
Re: Re: New Project Question
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
There isn't an equivalent in Trinidad. In theory, it should
work. Whether it will is a trickier question, especially
once you get into the land of sandbox + AJAX.
-- Adam
On 10/12/06, Robert Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your reply!
> One last question: I'm making use of the Sandbox components as
> well. Specifically, inputSuggestAjax. May I assume this component
> works within Trinidad as well, or that there is an equivalent? I
> haven't done a very thorough look through Trinidad at this point.
> Thanks again for all of your help.
>
>
> On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Adam Winer wrote:
>
> > If this is a new project, I'd also strongly recommend *NOT*
> > using Tiles. Look at Facelets, which has far better templating
> > support (esp. for JSF) than Tiles.
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
> > On 10/12/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Yes, you're absolutely right.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> Martin
> >>
> >> On 10/12/06, Robert D. Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com> wrote:
> >> > Coming from the Struts world for the last couple of years, I began
> >> > looking at MyFaces, Tiles and Tomahawk. I created a small project
> >> > using these components, when I came across Trinidad (ADF Faces) and
> >> > this mail list a couple of days ago. It seems at first glance
> >> that I
> >> > should migrate this project (and future projects) to Trinidad since
> >> > it seems to have a greater number of components, and Tomahawk
> >> > components can be added with little effort. Is this a fair
> >> > assessment? Any reasons not to take this approach? My
> >> apologies for
> >> > the newbie question.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> http://www.irian.at
> >>
> >> Your JSF powerhouse -
> >> JSF Consulting, Development and
> >> Courses in English and German
> >>
> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: New Project Question
Posted by Robert Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com>.
Thank you for your reply!
One last question: I'm making use of the Sandbox components as
well. Specifically, inputSuggestAjax. May I assume this component
works within Trinidad as well, or that there is an equivalent? I
haven't done a very thorough look through Trinidad at this point.
Thanks again for all of your help.
On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Adam Winer wrote:
> If this is a new project, I'd also strongly recommend *NOT*
> using Tiles. Look at Facelets, which has far better templating
> support (esp. for JSF) than Tiles.
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 10/12/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes, you're absolutely right.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On 10/12/06, Robert D. Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com> wrote:
>> > Coming from the Struts world for the last couple of years, I began
>> > looking at MyFaces, Tiles and Tomahawk. I created a small project
>> > using these components, when I came across Trinidad (ADF Faces) and
>> > this mail list a couple of days ago. It seems at first glance
>> that I
>> > should migrate this project (and future projects) to Trinidad since
>> > it seems to have a greater number of components, and Tomahawk
>> > components can be added with little effort. Is this a fair
>> > assessment? Any reasons not to take this approach? My
>> apologies for
>> > the newbie question.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> http://www.irian.at
>>
>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>> Courses in English and German
>>
>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>
>
Re: New Project Question -- NEVERMIND
Posted by Robert Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com>.
It helps to specify the correct URL! My apologies for the noise.
On Oct 18, 2006, at 8:34 AM, Robert Morse wrote:
> Hello Adam!
> I've done what you've suggested, and facelets looks very
> promising. However, I'm attempting to follow the example as shown in:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org/
> msg01024.html and I've downloaded the referenced at: http://
> www.aposso.de/pprTest.zip
>
> No exceptions are thrown, yet what appears on my browser (Safari,
> Firefox, IE 6) is just the XML file as shown below:
>
> <tr:document title="Facelets">
> −
> <tr:form>
> <tr:inputText label="Your name" id="input1"/>
> <tr:commandButton id="button1" text="press me" action=""/>
> </tr:form>
> </tr:document>
>
> The xhtml file actually contains:
>
> <tr:document xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets"
> xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"
> xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
> xmlns:tr="http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad"
> title="Facelets">
> <tr:form>
> <tr:inputText label="Your name" id="input1" />
> <tr:commandButton id="button1" text="press me"
> action="" />
> </tr:form>
> </tr:document>
>
>
> My web.xml and faces-config.xml are as described in the pprTest.
>
> I'm confident this is a very simple configuration issue, but for
> the life of me, I'm just not seeing it.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Adam Winer wrote:
>
>> If this is a new project, I'd also strongly recommend *NOT*
>> using Tiles. Look at Facelets, which has far better templating
>> support (esp. for JSF) than Tiles.
>>
>> -- Adam
>>
>>
>> On 10/12/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Yes, you're absolutely right.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> On 10/12/06, Robert D. Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com> wrote:
>>> > Coming from the Struts world for the last couple of years, I began
>>> > looking at MyFaces, Tiles and Tomahawk. I created a small project
>>> > using these components, when I came across Trinidad (ADF Faces)
>>> and
>>> > this mail list a couple of days ago. It seems at first glance
>>> that I
>>> > should migrate this project (and future projects) to Trinidad
>>> since
>>> > it seems to have a greater number of components, and Tomahawk
>>> > components can be added with little effort. Is this a fair
>>> > assessment? Any reasons not to take this approach? My
>>> apologies for
>>> > the newbie question.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> http://www.irian.at
>>>
>>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>>> Courses in English and German
>>>
>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: New Project Question
Posted by Robert Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com>.
I'm sorry for wasting your time on this. I followed-up with a
NEVERMIND post, albeit to late.
The issue was operator error. I was attempting to bring up the page
by not prefacing the page location with /faces.
Again, sorry for the noise.
On Oct 18, 2006, at 6:41 PM, Adam Winer wrote:
> This means that that Facelets didn't find the Trinidad
> config.
>
> What appserver are you using?
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 10/18/06, Robert Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com> wrote:
>> Hello Adam!
>> I've done what you've suggested, and facelets looks very promising.
>> However, I'm attempting to follow the example as shown in:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org/
>> msg01024.html and I've downloaded the referenced at: http://
>> www.aposso.de/pprTest.zip
>>
>> No exceptions are thrown, yet what appears on my browser (Safari,
>> Firefox, IE 6) is just the XML file as shown below:
>>
>> <tr:document title="Facelets">
>> −
>> <tr:form>
>> <tr:inputText label="Your name" id="input1"/>
>> <tr:commandButton id="button1" text="press me" action=""/>
>> </tr:form>
>> </tr:document>
>>
>> The xhtml file actually contains:
>>
>> <tr:document xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets"
>> xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"
>> xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
>> xmlns:tr="http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad"
>> title="Facelets">
>> <tr:form>
>> <tr:inputText label="Your name" id="input1" />
>> <tr:commandButton id="button1" text="press me"
>> action="" />
>> </tr:form>
>> </tr:document>
>>
>>
>> My web.xml and faces-config.xml are as described in the pprTest.
>>
>> I'm confident this is a very simple configuration issue, but for the
>> life of me, I'm just not seeing it.
>> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Adam Winer wrote:
>>
>> > If this is a new project, I'd also strongly recommend *NOT*
>> > using Tiles. Look at Facelets, which has far better templating
>> > support (esp. for JSF) than Tiles.
>> >
>> > -- Adam
>> >
>> >
>> > On 10/12/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Yes, you're absolutely right.
>> >>
>> >> regards,
>> >>
>> >> Martin
>> >>
>> >> On 10/12/06, Robert D. Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com> wrote:
>> >> > Coming from the Struts world for the last couple of years, I
>> began
>> >> > looking at MyFaces, Tiles and Tomahawk. I created a small
>> project
>> >> > using these components, when I came across Trinidad (ADF
>> Faces) and
>> >> > this mail list a couple of days ago. It seems at first glance
>> >> that I
>> >> > should migrate this project (and future projects) to Trinidad
>> since
>> >> > it seems to have a greater number of components, and Tomahawk
>> >> > components can be added with little effort. Is this a fair
>> >> > assessment? Any reasons not to take this approach? My
>> >> apologies for
>> >> > the newbie question.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> http://www.irian.at
>> >>
>> >> Your JSF powerhouse -
>> >> JSF Consulting, Development and
>> >> Courses in English and German
>> >>
>> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
Re: Re: New Project Question
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
This means that that Facelets didn't find the Trinidad
config.
What appserver are you using?
-- Adam
On 10/18/06, Robert Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com> wrote:
> Hello Adam!
> I've done what you've suggested, and facelets looks very promising.
> However, I'm attempting to follow the example as shown in:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org/
> msg01024.html and I've downloaded the referenced at: http://
> www.aposso.de/pprTest.zip
>
> No exceptions are thrown, yet what appears on my browser (Safari,
> Firefox, IE 6) is just the XML file as shown below:
>
> <tr:document title="Facelets">
> −
> <tr:form>
> <tr:inputText label="Your name" id="input1"/>
> <tr:commandButton id="button1" text="press me" action=""/>
> </tr:form>
> </tr:document>
>
> The xhtml file actually contains:
>
> <tr:document xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets"
> xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"
> xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
> xmlns:tr="http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad" title="Facelets">
> <tr:form>
> <tr:inputText label="Your name" id="input1" />
> <tr:commandButton id="button1" text="press me"
> action="" />
> </tr:form>
> </tr:document>
>
>
> My web.xml and faces-config.xml are as described in the pprTest.
>
> I'm confident this is a very simple configuration issue, but for the
> life of me, I'm just not seeing it.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Adam Winer wrote:
>
> > If this is a new project, I'd also strongly recommend *NOT*
> > using Tiles. Look at Facelets, which has far better templating
> > support (esp. for JSF) than Tiles.
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
> > On 10/12/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Yes, you're absolutely right.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> Martin
> >>
> >> On 10/12/06, Robert D. Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com> wrote:
> >> > Coming from the Struts world for the last couple of years, I began
> >> > looking at MyFaces, Tiles and Tomahawk. I created a small project
> >> > using these components, when I came across Trinidad (ADF Faces) and
> >> > this mail list a couple of days ago. It seems at first glance
> >> that I
> >> > should migrate this project (and future projects) to Trinidad since
> >> > it seems to have a greater number of components, and Tomahawk
> >> > components can be added with little effort. Is this a fair
> >> > assessment? Any reasons not to take this approach? My
> >> apologies for
> >> > the newbie question.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> http://www.irian.at
> >>
> >> Your JSF powerhouse -
> >> JSF Consulting, Development and
> >> Courses in English and German
> >>
> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: New Project Question
Posted by Robert Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com>.
Hello Adam!
I've done what you've suggested, and facelets looks very promising.
However, I'm attempting to follow the example as shown in:
http://www.mail-archive.com/adffaces-user@incubator.apache.org/
msg01024.html and I've downloaded the referenced at: http://
www.aposso.de/pprTest.zip
No exceptions are thrown, yet what appears on my browser (Safari,
Firefox, IE 6) is just the XML file as shown below:
<tr:document title="Facelets">
−
<tr:form>
<tr:inputText label="Your name" id="input1"/>
<tr:commandButton id="button1" text="press me" action=""/>
</tr:form>
</tr:document>
The xhtml file actually contains:
<tr:document xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets"
xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"
xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
xmlns:tr="http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad" title="Facelets">
<tr:form>
<tr:inputText label="Your name" id="input1" />
<tr:commandButton id="button1" text="press me"
action="" />
</tr:form>
</tr:document>
My web.xml and faces-config.xml are as described in the pprTest.
I'm confident this is a very simple configuration issue, but for the
life of me, I'm just not seeing it.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Adam Winer wrote:
> If this is a new project, I'd also strongly recommend *NOT*
> using Tiles. Look at Facelets, which has far better templating
> support (esp. for JSF) than Tiles.
>
> -- Adam
>
>
> On 10/12/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes, you're absolutely right.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On 10/12/06, Robert D. Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com> wrote:
>> > Coming from the Struts world for the last couple of years, I began
>> > looking at MyFaces, Tiles and Tomahawk. I created a small project
>> > using these components, when I came across Trinidad (ADF Faces) and
>> > this mail list a couple of days ago. It seems at first glance
>> that I
>> > should migrate this project (and future projects) to Trinidad since
>> > it seems to have a greater number of components, and Tomahawk
>> > components can be added with little effort. Is this a fair
>> > assessment? Any reasons not to take this approach? My
>> apologies for
>> > the newbie question.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> http://www.irian.at
>>
>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>> Courses in English and German
>>
>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>
>
Re: Re: New Project Question
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
If this is a new project, I'd also strongly recommend *NOT*
using Tiles. Look at Facelets, which has far better templating
support (esp. for JSF) than Tiles.
-- Adam
On 10/12/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, you're absolutely right.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 10/12/06, Robert D. Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com> wrote:
> > Coming from the Struts world for the last couple of years, I began
> > looking at MyFaces, Tiles and Tomahawk. I created a small project
> > using these components, when I came across Trinidad (ADF Faces) and
> > this mail list a couple of days ago. It seems at first glance that I
> > should migrate this project (and future projects) to Trinidad since
> > it seems to have a greater number of components, and Tomahawk
> > components can be added with little effort. Is this a fair
> > assessment? Any reasons not to take this approach? My apologies for
> > the newbie question.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: New Project Question
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Yes, you're absolutely right.
regards,
Martin
On 10/12/06, Robert D. Morse <rm...@mdesignz.com> wrote:
> Coming from the Struts world for the last couple of years, I began
> looking at MyFaces, Tiles and Tomahawk. I created a small project
> using these components, when I came across Trinidad (ADF Faces) and
> this mail list a couple of days ago. It seems at first glance that I
> should migrate this project (and future projects) to Trinidad since
> it seems to have a greater number of components, and Tomahawk
> components can be added with little effort. Is this a fair
> assessment? Any reasons not to take this approach? My apologies for
> the newbie question.
>
>
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces