You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@knox.apache.org by Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com> on 2013/03/27 19:27:40 UTC
[DISCUSS] Creating a Knox 0.2.0 release
Hi Everyone,
I've been slowly working through everything that I think needs to be
done to prepare for release. I think I'm mostly done with the exception
of things I can't really find or learn without actually doing it. So I
would like to start the release discussion. My reasons are:
1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we try it.
2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
Process wise I wasn't certain if I should go straight for the [VOTE] or
not, hence the [DISCUSS]
Kevin.
Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a Knox 0.2.0 release
Posted by larry mccay <la...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good to me!
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
<ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> This is perfect Kevin.
>
> I think you've been doing a good job discussing, you haven't really heard
> any objections as of yet to releasing, but just to make everyone feel
> included,
> why not wait say 24 hours this time and if no objections, post up the
> [VOTE] and
> go for it!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
> On 3/27/13 11:27 AM, "Kevin Minder" <ke...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi Everyone,
>>I've been slowly working through everything that I think needs to be
>>done to prepare for release. I think I'm mostly done with the exception
>>of things I can't really find or learn without actually doing it. So I
>>would like to start the release discussion. My reasons are:
>>
>>1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we try
>>it.
>>2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>>3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>>4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>
>>Process wise I wasn't certain if I should go straight for the [VOTE] or
>>not, hence the [DISCUSS]
>>Kevin.
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a Knox 0.2.0 release
Posted by Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks Chris. I'll call a vote tomorrow afternoon if there aren't any
objections. I assume that I should become very familiar with the docs
below.
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html
Anything else I should be aware of.
On 3/27/13 2:51 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> This is perfect Kevin.
>
> I think you've been doing a good job discussing, you haven't really heard
> any objections as of yet to releasing, but just to make everyone feel
> included,
> why not wait say 24 hours this time and if no objections, post up the
> [VOTE] and
> go for it!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
> On 3/27/13 11:27 AM, "Kevin Minder" <ke...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>> I've been slowly working through everything that I think needs to be
>> done to prepare for release. I think I'm mostly done with the exception
>> of things I can't really find or learn without actually doing it. So I
>> would like to start the release discussion. My reasons are:
>>
>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we try
>> it.
>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>
>> Process wise I wasn't certain if I should go straight for the [VOTE] or
>> not, hence the [DISCUSS]
>> Kevin.
Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a Knox 0.2.0 release
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
This is perfect Kevin.
I think you've been doing a good job discussing, you haven't really heard
any objections as of yet to releasing, but just to make everyone feel
included,
why not wait say 24 hours this time and if no objections, post up the
[VOTE] and
go for it!
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/27/13 11:27 AM, "Kevin Minder" <ke...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>Hi Everyone,
>I've been slowly working through everything that I think needs to be
>done to prepare for release. I think I'm mostly done with the exception
>of things I can't really find or learn without actually doing it. So I
>would like to start the release discussion. My reasons are:
>
>1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we try
>it.
>2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>
>Process wise I wasn't certain if I should go straight for the [VOTE] or
>not, hence the [DISCUSS]
>Kevin.