You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@gump.apache.org by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> on 2007/05/01 12:09:52 UTC
Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project junit (in module junit) failed
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, David Saff <sa...@mit.edu> wrote:
> I can't seem to replicate this locally.
The most important difference between performing a build locally and
doing so in Gump is CLASSPATH handling.
Gump forces Ant to ignore all your in-buildfile settings and only use
the CLASSPATH.
Sonce you restructured the build output, Gump didn't have the compiled
classes on its CLASSPATH anymore, I have now fixed that.
Cheers
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@gump.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@gump.apache.org
Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project junit (in module junit) failed
Posted by David Saff <sa...@mit.edu>.
Many thanks!
David Saff
On 5/1/07, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, David Saff <sa...@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> > I can't seem to replicate this locally.
>
> The most important difference between performing a build locally and
> doing so in Gump is CLASSPATH handling.
>
> Gump forces Ant to ignore all your in-buildfile settings and only use
> the CLASSPATH.
>
> Sonce you restructured the build output, Gump didn't have the compiled
> classes on its CLASSPATH anymore, I have now fixed that.
>
> Cheers
>
> Stefan
>