You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Marc Strapetz <ma...@syntevo.com> on 2008/03/11 10:13:58 UTC
svn log -g doesn't include mergeinfo from child entries
Current log -g only outputs "Merged via" information if the
corresponding mergeinfo is present at the logged entry itself. mergeinfo
from child entries is not included. Is that intended?
I'm asking because my last experiments with log -g (from October 2007)
brought complete mergeinfo here when logging the repository root (and I
couldn't find a thread on changing this). I'm using Alpha 2 from March, 3rd.
--
Best regards,
Marc Strapetz
_____________
SyntEvo GmbH
www.syntevo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn log -g doesn't include mergeinfo from child entries
Posted by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu>.
Marc Strapetz wrote:
>>> I'm asking because my last experiments with log -g (from October
>>> 2007) brought complete mergeinfo here when logging the repository
>>> root (and I couldn't find a thread on changing this). I'm using Alpha
>>> 2 from March, 3rd.
>>
>> Is this still a problem in beta1?
>
> Yes, the same behavior. Is it supposed to work? In this case I might
> upload the repository somewhere so you can have a look at it.
I'm still not exactly sure of the problem here. If you could provide
the repo in question, as well as a full reproduction recipe, that would
be useful.
Thanks,
-Hyrum
Re: svn log -g doesn't include mergeinfo from child entries
Posted by Marc Strapetz <ma...@syntevo.com>.
>> I'm asking because my last experiments with log -g (from October 2007)
>> brought complete mergeinfo here when logging the repository root (and
>> I couldn't find a thread on changing this). I'm using Alpha 2 from
>> March, 3rd.
>
> Is this still a problem in beta1?
Yes, the same behavior. Is it supposed to work? In this case I might
upload the repository somewhere so you can have a look at it.
--
Best regards,
Marc Strapetz
_____________
SyntEvo GmbH
www.syntevo.com
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> Marc Strapetz wrote:
>> Current log -g only outputs "Merged via" information if the
>> corresponding mergeinfo is present at the logged entry itself.
>> mergeinfo from child entries is not included. Is that intended?
>>
>> I'm asking because my last experiments with log -g (from October 2007)
>> brought complete mergeinfo here when logging the repository root (and
>> I couldn't find a thread on changing this). I'm using Alpha 2 from
>> March, 3rd.
>
> Is this still a problem in beta1?
>
> -Hyrum
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn log -g doesn't include mergeinfo from child entries
Posted by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu>.
Marc Strapetz wrote:
> Current log -g only outputs "Merged via" information if the
> corresponding mergeinfo is present at the logged entry itself. mergeinfo
> from child entries is not included. Is that intended?
>
> I'm asking because my last experiments with log -g (from October 2007)
> brought complete mergeinfo here when logging the repository root (and I
> couldn't find a thread on changing this). I'm using Alpha 2 from March,
> 3rd.
Is this still a problem in beta1?
-Hyrum