You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@river.apache.org by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/29 11:11:00 UTC
[VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Hi,
I would like to call the River PPMC to vote on accepting the ServiceUI
API contribution from Artima as submitted in the RIVER-10 Jira issue
[1]. The code can be imported in the River svn once the PPMC accepts
the contribution and the appropriate software grant has been received.
I didn't see the software grant as recorded (I may have overlooked
it), but we can already vote on accepting the code. The purpose of
this acceptance vote is to make sure that the PPMC is happy with the
contribution and ready to take on the responsibility of maintaining
the codebase.
So, please vote on accepting the contribution. The vote is open for
the next 72 hours and only votes from the River PPMC members are
binding. Like in all votes on code changes, a single -1 vote vetoes
the motion.
[ ] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
[ ] -1 Do not accept the contribution because ...
Here's my +1 (non-binding)
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-10
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Vinod Johnson - Sun Microsystems <Th...@Sun.COM>.
>
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
+1
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the contribution because ...
>
> Here's my +1 (non-binding)
>
--
- vinod
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Peter Jones <pe...@sun.com>.
> [X] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
-- Peter
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@mac.com>.
On Mar 29, 2007, at 2:11 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to call the River PPMC to vote on accepting the ServiceUI
> API contribution from Artima as submitted in the RIVER-10 Jira issue
> [1]. The code can be imported in the River svn once the PPMC accepts
> the contribution and the appropriate software grant has been received.
> I didn't see the software grant as recorded (I may have overlooked
> it), but we can already vote on accepting the code. The purpose of
> this acceptance vote is to make sure that the PPMC is happy with the
> contribution and ready to take on the responsibility of maintaining
> the codebase.
>
> So, please vote on accepting the contribution. The vote is open for
> the next 72 hours and only votes from the River PPMC members are
> binding. Like in all votes on code changes, a single -1 vote vetoes
> the motion.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the contribution because ...
+1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
Hm. I remember him getting it in as well...
On Mar 29, 2007, at 6:52 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/29/07, Bill Venners <bv...@artima.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 29, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> > I didn't see the software grant as recorded (I may have overlooked
>> > it), but we can already vote on accepting the code.
>>
>> I submitted all the documents a long time back, but they haven't
>> seemed to have been recorded. I both faxed them and mailed them. I
>> also asked previously but didn't get an answer, so I'll ask again--
>> did they arrive?
>
> I found an entry for your ICLA but not a CCLA nor a software grant. I
> searched for keywords "artima", "serviceui", "venners", "river", and
> "jini". I'll check with the ASF secretary if he knows about your CCLA.
> If not, then it's probably easiest if you resend it.
>
> PS. The Sun CCLA that covers contributions to River is on file.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On 3/29/07, Bill Venners <bv...@artima.com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> > I didn't see the software grant as recorded (I may have overlooked
> > it), but we can already vote on accepting the code.
>
> I submitted all the documents a long time back, but they haven't
> seemed to have been recorded. I both faxed them and mailed them. I
> also asked previously but didn't get an answer, so I'll ask again--
> did they arrive?
I found an entry for your ICLA but not a CCLA nor a software grant. I
searched for keywords "artima", "serviceui", "venners", "river", and
"jini". I'll check with the ASF secretary if he knows about your CCLA.
If not, then it's probably easiest if you resend it.
PS. The Sun CCLA that covers contributions to River is on file.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
+1
On Mar 29, 2007, at 6:39 AM, Bill Venners wrote:
> Hi Jukka,
>
> On Mar 29, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
>> I would like to call the River PPMC to vote on accepting the
>> ServiceUI
>> API contribution from Artima as submitted in the RIVER-10 Jira issue
>> [1]. The code can be imported in the River svn once the PPMC accepts
>> the contribution and the appropriate software grant has been
>> received.
>> I didn't see the software grant as recorded (I may have overlooked
>> it), but we can already vote on accepting the code. The purpose of
>> this acceptance vote is to make sure that the PPMC is happy with the
>> contribution and ready to take on the responsibility of maintaining
>> the codebase.
>>
> I submitted all the documents a long time back, but they haven't
> seemed to have been recorded. I both faxed them and mailed them. I
> also asked previously but didn't get an answer, so I'll ask again--
> did they arrive?
>
>> So, please vote on accepting the contribution. The vote is open for
>> the next 72 hours and only votes from the River PPMC members are
>> binding. Like in all votes on code changes, a single -1 vote vetoes
>> the motion.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
>> [ ] -1 Do not accept the contribution because ...
>>
> +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
>
> Bill
> ----
> Bill Venners
> President
> Artima, Inc.
> http://www.artima.com
>
>
>> Here's my +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-10
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Jukka Zitting
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Bill Venners <bv...@artima.com>.
Hi Jukka,
On Mar 29, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> I would like to call the River PPMC to vote on accepting the ServiceUI
> API contribution from Artima as submitted in the RIVER-10 Jira issue
> [1]. The code can be imported in the River svn once the PPMC accepts
> the contribution and the appropriate software grant has been received.
> I didn't see the software grant as recorded (I may have overlooked
> it), but we can already vote on accepting the code. The purpose of
> this acceptance vote is to make sure that the PPMC is happy with the
> contribution and ready to take on the responsibility of maintaining
> the codebase.
>
I submitted all the documents a long time back, but they haven't
seemed to have been recorded. I both faxed them and mailed them. I
also asked previously but didn't get an answer, so I'll ask again--
did they arrive?
> So, please vote on accepting the contribution. The vote is open for
> the next 72 hours and only votes from the River PPMC members are
> binding. Like in all votes on code changes, a single -1 vote vetoes
> the motion.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the contribution because ...
>
+1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
Bill
----
Bill Venners
President
Artima, Inc.
http://www.artima.com
> Here's my +1 (non-binding)
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-10
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Juan Ramirez <Ju...@Sun.COM>.
Jukka Zitting wrote On 03/29/07 04:11,:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the contribution because ...
>
+1
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Mark Brouwer <ma...@cheiron.org>.
Jukka Zitting wrote:
> [X] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the contribution because ...
--
Mark
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com>.
+1
Phil
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Dan Creswell <da...@dcrdev.demon.co.uk>.
Jukka Zitting wrote:
[snip]
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the contribution because ...
>
+1
[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On 3/29/07, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would like to call the River PPMC to vote on accepting the ServiceUI
> API contribution from Artima as submitted in the RIVER-10 Jira issue
> [...]
> So, please vote on accepting the contribution. The vote is open for
> the next 72 hours and only votes from the River PPMC members are
> binding. Like in all votes on code changes, a single -1 vote vetoes
> the motion.
The vote passes with 17 +1 votes, including 2 binding +1 votes from
the current River PPMC (so far officially just the mentors). The votes
were:
+1 Frank Barnaby
+1 Mark Brouwer
+1 Dan Creswell
+1 Nigel Daley
+1 Jim Hurley
+1 Vinod Johnson
+1 Peter Jones
+1 Geir Magnusson Jr. (binding)
+1 John McClain
+1 Fred Oliver
+1 Juan Ramirez
+1 Robert Resendes
+1 Bob Scheifler
+1 Phil Steitz (binding)
+1 Bill Venners
+1 Jim Waldo
+1 Jukka Zitting
Thanks for casting your votes!
PS. The CCLA that included the software grant for the contributed code
seems to have been lost. Bill mentioned that he could resend the CCLA
next week, after which everything is OK for committing the code in
svn. I'll comment on RIVER-10 when the software grant has been
recorded.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Frank Barnaby <Fr...@Sun.COM>.
[X] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Fred Oliver <Fr...@Sun.COM>.
+1
-Fred
> [X ] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the contribution because ...
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Bob Scheifler <Bo...@Sun.COM>.
[X] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
- Bob
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Jim Hurley <Ji...@Sun.COM>.
+1
-Jim
> [X ] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the contribution because ...
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by Robert Resendes <Ro...@Sun.COM>.
>
> [X] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
Bob
Re: [VOTE] Accept the ServiceUI API Contribution from Artima
Posted by John McClain <Jo...@Sun.COM>.
[X] +1 Accept the ServiceUI API contribution from Artima
[ ] -1 Do not accept the contribution because ...