You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Jiangjie Qin <be...@gmail.com> on 2015/02/13 22:40:34 UTC

Review Request 31021: Patch for KAFKA-1951

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31021/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for kafka.


Bugs: KAFKA-1951
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1951


Repository: kafka


Description
-------

Fix for KAFKA-1951


Diffs
-----

  core/src/main/scala/kafka/tools/ConsumerOffsetChecker.scala d1e7c434e77859d746b8dc68dd5d5a3740425e79 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31021/diff/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Jiangjie Qin


Re: Review Request 31021: Patch for KAFKA-1951

Posted by Jiangjie Qin <be...@gmail.com>.

> On Feb. 14, 2015, 9:04 p.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
> > core/src/main/scala/kafka/tools/ConsumerOffsetChecker.scala, lines 83-85
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/31021/diff/1/?file=863672#file863672line83>
> >
> >     Adding comma-separated columns at the end of the row, instead of parentheses, will make it easier for those who try to parse the output for monitoring.
> >     
> >     Not sure how many people are doing this, though.

Good point :) 
I got some exception when I ran the offset checker a couple of days ago and there are someone on the mailing list confused by the offset checker as well. So I guess there probably a few people are using the offset checker. Considering this is also a tool in 0.8.2, I think it might worth making it work properly.


- Jiangjie


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31021/#review72514
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 17, 2015, 12:36 a.m., Jiangjie Qin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31021/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 17, 2015, 12:36 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1951
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1951
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Addressed Gwen's comment.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/tools/ConsumerOffsetChecker.scala d1e7c434e77859d746b8dc68dd5d5a3740425e79 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiangjie Qin
> 
>


Re: Review Request 31021: Patch for KAFKA-1951

Posted by Gwen Shapira <gs...@cloudera.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31021/#review72514
-----------------------------------------------------------



core/src/main/scala/kafka/tools/ConsumerOffsetChecker.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31021/#comment118576>

    Adding comma-separated columns at the end of the row, instead of parentheses, will make it easier for those who try to parse the output for monitoring.
    
    Not sure how many people are doing this, though.


- Gwen Shapira


On Feb. 13, 2015, 9:40 p.m., Jiangjie Qin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31021/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 13, 2015, 9:40 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1951
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1951
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fix for KAFKA-1951
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/tools/ConsumerOffsetChecker.scala d1e7c434e77859d746b8dc68dd5d5a3740425e79 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiangjie Qin
> 
>


Re: Review Request 31021: Patch for KAFKA-1951

Posted by Jiangjie Qin <be...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31021/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Feb. 17, 2015, 12:36 a.m.)


Review request for kafka.


Bugs: KAFKA-1951
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1951


Repository: kafka


Description (updated)
-------

Addressed Gwen's comment.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  core/src/main/scala/kafka/tools/ConsumerOffsetChecker.scala d1e7c434e77859d746b8dc68dd5d5a3740425e79 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31021/diff/


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Jiangjie Qin