You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by Sergey Svinarchuk <ss...@hortonworks.com> on 2014/02/19 15:14:43 UTC
Hadoop 2 support
Today I updated patch in M-1329 to trunk. It's ticket that add support
hadoop2 to mahout.
I builded mahout with patch and all UT was passed for hadoop1 and hadoop2.
Also I tested examples/bin on the both hadoop version.
Can somebody from committers review patch and test it?
Thanks,
Sergey!
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Hadoop 2 support
Posted by Suneel Marthi <su...@yahoo.com>.
Yes
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 10:43 AM, Sergey Svinarchuk <ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
Thanks!
This patch will be added in mahout 1.0?
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> Thanks for the patch Sergey. I tested this with Hadoop 1 and 2 and can
> confirm that all unit tests pass and the examples work.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 9:39 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hmm I thought there was already a profile for this, but on second
> look, I only see a settable hadoop.version. It has both hadoop-core
> and hadoop-common dependencies which isn't right. I bet this patch
> clarifies the difference properly, and that's got to be good.
>
> I think I am thinking of how the CDH packaging does something like
> this. Thanks, I thought this was already in HEAD in some form. It does
> need to be, since the code does in fact run OK on Hadoop 2, modulo the
> odd bug due to behavior differences.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Svinarchuk
> <ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > This patch updat mahout dependency and create 2 profile:
> > - hadoop1 build mahout with Hadoop 1 dependency (uses by default)
> > - hadoop2 build mahout with Hadoop 2 dependency
> > Because if now build mahout and then run it on machine where installed
> > hadoop 2 - mahout job will be failed.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Sergey I think it already worked with 2.0, no? (Although it doesn't
> >> actually use the 2.x APIs). Is this for 2.2 and/or what are the
> >> high-level changes? I'd imagine mostly packaging stuff.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Sergey Svinarchuk
> >> <ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >> > Today I updated patch in M-1329 to trunk. It's ticket that add support
> >> > hadoop2 to mahout.
> >> > I builded mahout with patch and all UT was passed for hadoop1 and
> >> hadoop2.
> >> > Also I tested examples/bin on the both hadoop version.
> >> > Can somebody from committers review patch and test it?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Sergey!
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >> > NOTICE: This
> message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> >> to
> >> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> confidential,
> >> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> >> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> >> that
> >> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> >> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> >> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> >> immediately
> >> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >>
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE:
> This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Hadoop 2 support
Posted by Sergey Svinarchuk <ss...@hortonworks.com>.
I updated patch to M-1329 with Gokhan and Suneel recommendation in
comments.
And can anybody test new patch?
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> Thanks Sergey. This needs some fixing it takes about 5 mins on my machine
> too for a small Reuters dataset.
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 11:06 AM, Sergey Svinarchuk <
> ssvinarchuk@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> On my machine this example runs 5 minutes.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
> Sergey,
>
> Have u tried running /examples/bin/cluster-reuters,sh -> Option 4
> Streaming Kmeans ?
>
> I just need one other person (other than myself) to confirm to me that its
> execution is real slow.
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 10:43 AM, Sergey Svinarchuk <
> ssvinarchuk@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Thanks!
> This patch will be added in mahout 1.0?
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Suneel Marthi <suneel_marthi@yahoo.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the patch Sergey. I tested this with Hadoop 1 and 2 and can
> > confirm that all unit tests pass and the examples work.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 9:39 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hmm I thought there was already a profile for this, but on second
> > look, I only see a settable hadoop.version. It has both hadoop-core
> > and hadoop-common dependencies which isn't right. I bet this patch
> > clarifies the difference properly, and that's got to be good.
> >
> > I think I am thinking of how the CDH packaging does something like
> > this. Thanks, I thought this was already in HEAD in some form. It does
> > need to be, since the code does in fact run OK on Hadoop 2, modulo the
> > odd bug due to behavior differences.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Svinarchuk
> > <ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > > This patch updat mahout dependency and create 2 profile:
> > > - hadoop1 build mahout with Hadoop 1 dependency (uses by default)
> > > - hadoop2 build mahout with Hadoop 2 dependency
> > > Because if now build mahout and then run it on machine where installed
> > > hadoop 2 - mahout job will be failed.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Sergey I think it already worked with 2.0, no? (Although it doesn't
> > >> actually use the 2.x APIs). Is this for 2.2 and/or what are the
> > >> high-level changes? I'd imagine mostly packaging stuff.
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Sergey Svinarchuk
> > >> <ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > >> > Today I updated patch in M-1329 to trunk. It's ticket that add
> support
> > >> > hadoop2 to mahout.
> > >> > I builded mahout with patch and all UT was passed for hadoop1 and
> > >> hadoop2.
> > >> > Also I tested examples/bin on the both hadoop version.
> > >> > Can somebody from committers review patch and test it?
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Sergey!
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > >> > NOTICE: This
> > message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> > >> to
> > >> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> > confidential,
> > >> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > reader
> > >> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified
> > >> that
> > >> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > >> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > >> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > >> immediately
> > >> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > NOTICE:
> > This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> > that
> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > immediately
> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
>
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Hadoop 2 support
Posted by Sergey Svinarchuk <ss...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks!
This patch will be added in mahout 1.0?
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Suneel Marthi <su...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> Thanks for the patch Sergey. I tested this with Hadoop 1 and 2 and can
> confirm that all unit tests pass and the examples work.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 9:39 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hmm I thought there was already a profile for this, but on second
> look, I only see a settable hadoop.version. It has both hadoop-core
> and hadoop-common dependencies which isn't right. I bet this patch
> clarifies the difference properly, and that's got to be good.
>
> I think I am thinking of how the CDH packaging does something like
> this. Thanks, I thought this was already in HEAD in some form. It does
> need to be, since the code does in fact run OK on Hadoop 2, modulo the
> odd bug due to behavior differences.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Svinarchuk
> <ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > This patch updat mahout dependency and create 2 profile:
> > - hadoop1 build mahout with Hadoop 1 dependency (uses by default)
> > - hadoop2 build mahout with Hadoop 2 dependency
> > Because if now build mahout and then run it on machine where installed
> > hadoop 2 - mahout job will be failed.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Sergey I think it already worked with 2.0, no? (Although it doesn't
> >> actually use the 2.x APIs). Is this for 2.2 and/or what are the
> >> high-level changes? I'd imagine mostly packaging stuff.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Sergey Svinarchuk
> >> <ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >> > Today I updated patch in M-1329 to trunk. It's ticket that add support
> >> > hadoop2 to mahout.
> >> > I builded mahout with patch and all UT was passed for hadoop1 and
> >> hadoop2.
> >> > Also I tested examples/bin on the both hadoop version.
> >> > Can somebody from committers review patch and test it?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Sergey!
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >> > NOTICE: This
> message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> >> to
> >> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> confidential,
> >> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> >> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> >> that
> >> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> >> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> >> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> >> immediately
> >> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >>
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE:
> This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Hadoop 2 support
Posted by Suneel Marthi <su...@yahoo.com>.
Thanks for the patch Sergey. I tested this with Hadoop 1 and 2 and can confirm that all unit tests pass and the examples work.
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 9:39 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm I thought there was already a profile for this, but on second
look, I only see a settable hadoop.version. It has both hadoop-core
and hadoop-common dependencies which isn't right. I bet this patch
clarifies the difference properly, and that's got to be good.
I think I am thinking of how the CDH packaging does something like
this. Thanks, I thought this was already in HEAD in some form. It does
need to be, since the code does in fact run OK on Hadoop 2, modulo the
odd bug due to behavior differences.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Svinarchuk
<ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> This patch updat mahout dependency and create 2 profile:
> - hadoop1 build mahout with Hadoop 1 dependency (uses by default)
> - hadoop2 build mahout with Hadoop 2 dependency
> Because if now build mahout and then run it on machine where installed
> hadoop 2 - mahout job will be failed.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sergey I think it already worked with 2.0, no? (Although it doesn't
>> actually use the 2.x APIs). Is this for 2.2 and/or what are the
>> high-level changes? I'd imagine mostly packaging stuff.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Sergey Svinarchuk
>> <ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> > Today I updated patch in M-1329 to trunk. It's ticket that add support
>> > hadoop2 to mahout.
>> > I builded mahout with patch and all UT was passed for hadoop1 and
>> hadoop2.
>> > Also I tested examples/bin on the both hadoop version.
>> > Can somebody from committers review patch and test it?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Sergey!
>> >
>> > --
>> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> > NOTICE: This
message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
>> to
>> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>> that
>> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>> immediately
>> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE:
This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Hadoop 2 support
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
Hmm I thought there was already a profile for this, but on second
look, I only see a settable hadoop.version. It has both hadoop-core
and hadoop-common dependencies which isn't right. I bet this patch
clarifies the difference properly, and that's got to be good.
I think I am thinking of how the CDH packaging does something like
this. Thanks, I thought this was already in HEAD in some form. It does
need to be, since the code does in fact run OK on Hadoop 2, modulo the
odd bug due to behavior differences.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Svinarchuk
<ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> This patch updat mahout dependency and create 2 profile:
> - hadoop1 build mahout with Hadoop 1 dependency (uses by default)
> - hadoop2 build mahout with Hadoop 2 dependency
> Because if now build mahout and then run it on machine where installed
> hadoop 2 - mahout job will be failed.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sergey I think it already worked with 2.0, no? (Although it doesn't
>> actually use the 2.x APIs). Is this for 2.2 and/or what are the
>> high-level changes? I'd imagine mostly packaging stuff.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Sergey Svinarchuk
>> <ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> > Today I updated patch in M-1329 to trunk. It's ticket that add support
>> > hadoop2 to mahout.
>> > I builded mahout with patch and all UT was passed for hadoop1 and
>> hadoop2.
>> > Also I tested examples/bin on the both hadoop version.
>> > Can somebody from committers review patch and test it?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Sergey!
>> >
>> > --
>> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
>> to
>> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>> that
>> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>> immediately
>> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Hadoop 2 support
Posted by Sergey Svinarchuk <ss...@hortonworks.com>.
This patch updat mahout dependency and create 2 profile:
- hadoop1 build mahout with Hadoop 1 dependency (uses by default)
- hadoop2 build mahout with Hadoop 2 dependency
Because if now build mahout and then run it on machine where installed
hadoop 2 - mahout job will be failed.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sergey I think it already worked with 2.0, no? (Although it doesn't
> actually use the 2.x APIs). Is this for 2.2 and/or what are the
> high-level changes? I'd imagine mostly packaging stuff.
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Sergey Svinarchuk
> <ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > Today I updated patch in M-1329 to trunk. It's ticket that add support
> > hadoop2 to mahout.
> > I builded mahout with patch and all UT was passed for hadoop1 and
> hadoop2.
> > Also I tested examples/bin on the both hadoop version.
> > Can somebody from committers review patch and test it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sergey!
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Hadoop 2 support
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
Sergey I think it already worked with 2.0, no? (Although it doesn't
actually use the 2.x APIs). Is this for 2.2 and/or what are the
high-level changes? I'd imagine mostly packaging stuff.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Sergey Svinarchuk
<ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Today I updated patch in M-1329 to trunk. It's ticket that add support
> hadoop2 to mahout.
> I builded mahout with patch and all UT was passed for hadoop1 and hadoop2.
> Also I tested examples/bin on the both hadoop version.
> Can somebody from committers review patch and test it?
>
> Thanks,
> Sergey!
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.