RE: TRACE level

[Jim Moore <ji...@veritas.com>]

"In order to make this work I need a logger class as well right?"
In Log4j pre-1.2 the answer was yes, but not anymore.  However, in your
properties, you have to specify the class.

For example, in your log4j.properties file:
  log4j.logger.HolderLogger=trace#com.mycompany.TraceablePriority

And in your code you do
  if (LOGGER.isEnabledFor(TraceablePriority.TRACE))
    LOGGER.log(TraceablePriority.TRACE, "My message");



-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Hager [mailto:sean@comaco.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:51 PM
To: jim.moore@veritas.com
Subject: RE: TRACE level


Thanks for the information Jim.

In order to make this work I need a logger class as well right?  would you
be willing to spare your well tested code?

sean.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Moore [mailto:jim.moore@veritas.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:59 PM
> To: 'Log4J Developers List'
> Subject: RE: TRACE level
>
>
> I'll save you some programming:
>
> public class TraceLevel extends Level {
>   public static final int TRACE_INT = 800;
>
>   // We assimilate TRACE to DEBUG on Syslog
>   private static final int SYSLOG_TRACE_INT = 7;
>
>   public static final TraceLevel TRACE =
>       new TraceLevel(TRACE_INT, "TRACE", SYSLOG_TRACE_INT);
>
>   final static public Level ALL = new TraceLevel(ALL_INT, "ALL", 9);
>
>   protected TraceLevel(int level, String strLevel, int syslogEquiv) {
>     super(level, strLevel, syslogEquiv);
>   }
>
>   public static Priority toPriority(String sArg) {
>     return toPriority(sArg, TraceLevel.TRACE);
>   }
>
>   public static Priority toPriority(int i) throws 
> IllegalArgumentException {
>     return toPriority(i, TraceLevel.TRACE);
>   }
>
>   public static Priority toPriority(int i, Priority priority) {
>     Priority p = (i == TRACE_INT) ?
>         TraceLevel.TRACE :
>         Priority.toPriority(i, priority);
>
>     return p;
>   }
>
>   public static Priority toPriority(String sArg, Priority priority) {
>     Priority p = (sArg == null) ?
>         TraceLevel.TRACE :
>         ((sArg.equalsIgnoreCase("TRACE")) ?
>         TraceLevel.TRACE :
>         Priority.toPriority(sArg, priority));
>
>     return p;
>   }
>
>   public static Level toLevel(String s) {
>     return toLevel(s, TraceLevel.TRACE);
>   }
>
>   public static Level toLevel(int i) {
>     return toLevel(i, TraceLevel.TRACE);
>   }
>
>   public static Level toLevel(int i, Level level) {
>     Level l = (i == TRACE_INT) ?
>         TraceLevel.TRACE :
>         Level.toLevel(i, level);
>
>     return l;
>   }
>
>   public static Level toLevel(String s, Level level) {
>     Level l = (s == null) ?
>         TraceLevel.TRACE :
>         ((s.equalsIgnoreCase("TRACE")) ?
>         TraceLevel.TRACE :
>         Level.toLevel(s, level));
>
>     return l;
>   }
>
>   /**
>    * @deprecated
>    */
>   public static Priority[] getAllPossiblePriorities() {
>     return new Priority[]{Priority.FATAL, Priority.ERROR, Level.WARN,
>                           Priority.INFO, Priority.DEBUG, TRACE};
>   }
> }
>
> Obviously, I use TRACE levels myself.  This topic keeps coming up, and 
> it's constantly disagreed with (largely for reasons of not cluttering 
> the namespace of available levels -- see discussion regarding issues 
> with JSR47...).
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Hager [mailto:sean@comaco.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:52 PM
> To: log4j-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: TRACE level
>
>
> Before I subclass the level class and add in a TRACE level, is there 
> any chance log4j will add in a TRACE level?
>
>
> I really see the need to have a TRACE level that just details path of 
> the program without cluttering up the DEBUG level output.
>
> Sean.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>