You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by LAGALISSE Eric <Er...@casden.banquepopulaire.fr> on 2003/03/24 13:29:37 UTC
RE : lb_factor defect.
We're using the 1.2.2 release.
Could you explain me what you mean by ' Could you retry with HEAD ?'
Thanks for your help.
Eric LAGALISSE
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Henri Gomez [mailto:hgomez@apache.org]
Envoyé : lundi 24 mars 2003 13:11
À : Tomcat Developers List
Objet : Re: lb_factor defect.
LAGALISSE Eric wrote:
> After several test using mod_jk 2.0.43 on Linux with apache 2.0.43 we
> noticed that if we define workers.properties as follow the load
> balancing send to both tomcat server but not in the same ratio.
>
> For example if we stress with 100 users, 80 are routed to the first
> tomcat server declared in workers.properties and 20 are routed to the
> second.
>
>
>
> After a look at the source code i supposed that if lb_factor is similar
> for all load_balanced worker, load should be equal on all. But not.
>
Which release of mod_jk are you using ?
jk 1.2.2 is the latest release and there is some fixes in HEAD (which
will became shortly 1.2.3).
Could you retry with HEAD ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org