You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com> on 2013/12/17 17:41:31 UTC
Rolling a quick patch release due to API incompatibility introduced
in 0.96.1
Hey folks,
I was reviewing some patches [0] and found that we introduced an API
incompatibility in 0.96.1. [1] The problem has been fixed. [2].
To make it a quick release I'm thinking of taking the 0.96.1 tag and only
applying [2], calling it 0.96.1.1 so we can have a quick vote on it.
(similar to 0.94.6.1).
[0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10186
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10012
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10188
Should be up for people to try shortly.
Jon
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com
Re: Rolling a quick patch release due to API incompatibility
introduced in 0.96.1
Posted by Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com>.
Scratch that -- I was able to retrieve my passphrase.
Currently uploading artifacts to my people.apache.org and to maven repo for
release candidacy.
Jon.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> So I've gotten through most of the build/branch related processes but am
> currently stuck because I'm about 2k miles away from where I secured my
> rarely used pgp passphrase. :(
>
> Elliott Clark has his and will take over rolling this release from the
> commits I've made for 0.96.1.1.
>
> Thanks,
> Jon.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Argh +1
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey folks,
>> >
>> > I was reviewing some patches [0] and found that we introduced an API
>> > incompatibility in 0.96.1. [1] The problem has been fixed. [2].
>> >
>> > To make it a quick release I'm thinking of taking the 0.96.1 tag and
>> only
>> > applying [2], calling it 0.96.1.1 so we can have a quick vote on it.
>> > (similar to 0.94.6.1).
>> >
>> > [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10186
>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10012
>> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10188
>> >
>> > Should be up for people to try shortly.
>> >
>> > Jon
>> >
>> > --
>> > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
>> > // Software Engineer, Cloudera
>> > // jon@cloudera.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // jon@cloudera.com
>
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com
Re: Rolling a quick patch release due to API incompatibility
introduced in 0.96.1
Posted by Enis Söztutar <en...@gmail.com>.
+1.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> So I've gotten through most of the build/branch related processes but am
> currently stuck because I'm about 2k miles away from where I secured my
> rarely used pgp passphrase. :(
>
> Elliott Clark has his and will take over rolling this release from the
> commits I've made for 0.96.1.1.
>
> Thanks,
> Jon.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > Argh +1
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey folks,
> > >
> > > I was reviewing some patches [0] and found that we introduced an API
> > > incompatibility in 0.96.1. [1] The problem has been fixed. [2].
> > >
> > > To make it a quick release I'm thinking of taking the 0.96.1 tag and
> only
> > > applying [2], calling it 0.96.1.1 so we can have a quick vote on it.
> > > (similar to 0.94.6.1).
> > >
> > > [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10186
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10012
> > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10188
> > >
> > > Should be up for people to try shortly.
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> > > --
> > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > > // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > > // jon@cloudera.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // jon@cloudera.com
>
Re: Rolling a quick patch release due to API incompatibility
introduced in 0.96.1
Posted by Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com>.
So I've gotten through most of the build/branch related processes but am
currently stuck because I'm about 2k miles away from where I secured my
rarely used pgp passphrase. :(
Elliott Clark has his and will take over rolling this release from the
commits I've made for 0.96.1.1.
Thanks,
Jon.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>wrote:
> Argh +1
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > I was reviewing some patches [0] and found that we introduced an API
> > incompatibility in 0.96.1. [1] The problem has been fixed. [2].
> >
> > To make it a quick release I'm thinking of taking the 0.96.1 tag and only
> > applying [2], calling it 0.96.1.1 so we can have a quick vote on it.
> > (similar to 0.94.6.1).
> >
> > [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10186
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10012
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10188
> >
> > Should be up for people to try shortly.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > --
> > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > // jon@cloudera.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com
Re: Rolling a quick patch release due to API incompatibility
introduced in 0.96.1
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Argh +1
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I was reviewing some patches [0] and found that we introduced an API
> incompatibility in 0.96.1. [1] The problem has been fixed. [2].
>
> To make it a quick release I'm thinking of taking the 0.96.1 tag and only
> applying [2], calling it 0.96.1.1 so we can have a quick vote on it.
> (similar to 0.94.6.1).
>
> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10186
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10012
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10188
>
> Should be up for people to try shortly.
>
> Jon
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // jon@cloudera.com
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: Rolling a quick patch release due to API incompatibility
introduced in 0.96.1
Posted by Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>.
+1 with the approach. As you said, same as we did for 0.94.6.1...
2013/12/17 Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com>
> Hey folks,
>
> I was reviewing some patches [0] and found that we introduced an API
> incompatibility in 0.96.1. [1] The problem has been fixed. [2].
>
> To make it a quick release I'm thinking of taking the 0.96.1 tag and only
> applying [2], calling it 0.96.1.1 so we can have a quick vote on it.
> (similar to 0.94.6.1).
>
> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10186
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10012
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10188
>
> Should be up for people to try shortly.
>
> Jon
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // jon@cloudera.com
>
Re: Rolling a quick patch release due to API incompatibility
introduced in 0.96.1
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
+1
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jo...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I was reviewing some patches [0] and found that we introduced an API
> incompatibility in 0.96.1. [1] The problem has been fixed. [2].
>
> To make it a quick release I'm thinking of taking the 0.96.1 tag and only
> applying [2], calling it 0.96.1.1 so we can have a quick vote on it.
> (similar to 0.94.6.1).
>
> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10186
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10012
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10188
>
> Should be up for people to try shortly.
>
> Jon
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // jon@cloudera.com
>