You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> on 2011/02/14 19:42:24 UTC
[RESULT] [VOTE] Versioning after a failed release
I'm closing this vote with the following results:
binding A: Guillaume Nodet, Stuart McCulloch, Karl Pauls, Clément Escoffier
non binding A: Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Andreas Pieber, Simon,
Alasdair Nottingham, David Jencks, Jeremy Hugues
non binding B: Toni Menzel, Sahoo
binding B: Felix Mschberger, Marcel Offermans, Carsten Ziegeler
The A option seems is favored, but given the number of B votes, I'll
update the release process to indicate that the release manager is
free to either use a different version or delete the tag and re-create
it with the same version.
Thx to everybody !
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 09:50, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Following the discussion, I'm starting a vote to decide on a policy
> for failed releases.
>
> [ ] A - Releases following a failed release can reuse the same version
> [ ] B - Releases following a failed release must use a different version
>
> The vote will be opened for at least 72 hours.
> Happy voting!
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Versioning after a failed release
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 2/14/11 13:42, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'm closing this vote with the following results:
> binding A: Guillaume Nodet, Stuart McCulloch, Karl Pauls, Clément Escoffier
> non binding A: Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Andreas Pieber, Simon,
> Alasdair Nottingham, David Jencks, Jeremy Hugues
> non binding B: Toni Menzel, Sahoo
> binding B: Felix Mschberger, Marcel Offermans, Carsten Ziegeler
>
> The A option seems is favored, but given the number of B votes, I'll
> update the release process to indicate that the release manager is
> free to either use a different version or delete the tag and re-create
> it with the same version.
Sounds reasonable to me. Thanks.
-> richard
> Thx to everybody !
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 09:50, Guillaume Nodet<gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Following the discussion, I'm starting a vote to decide on a policy
>> for failed releases.
>>
>> [ ] A - Releases following a failed release can reuse the same version
>> [ ] B - Releases following a failed release must use a different version
>>
>> The vote will be opened for at least 72 hours.
>> Happy voting!
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>
>