You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> on 2021/03/25 14:17:46 UTC
Looking for guidance on IP clearance process for donation to Apache Arrow
Hi,
The Apache Arrow PMC has passed a vote to accept the donation of the
Ballista project [1].
The donation contains code from ~30 contributors and it may not be possible
to obtain ICLAs from all of them. If this does turn out to be the
situation, what steps can we take instead?
Thanks,
Andy.
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9723
Re: Looking for guidance on IP clearance process for donation to
Apache Arrow
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:18 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Apache Arrow PMC has passed a vote to accept the donation of the
> Ballista project [1].
>
> The donation contains code from ~30 contributors and it may not be possible
> to obtain ICLAs from all of them. If this does turn out to be the
> situation, what steps can we take instead?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9723
>
--
Clebert Suconic
Re: Looking for guidance on IP clearance process for donation to
Apache Arrow
Posted by Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>.
Thank you Craig for the detailed advice. I have updated the IP clearance
form and will start the vote email thread shortly.
Andy,
On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 1:40 PM Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> > On Apr 3, 2021, at 8:22 AM, Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for that advice, Craig.
> >
> > I have gone ahead and created
> > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-rust-ballista.html in
> > preparation for the vote and I have a couple more questions now:
> >
> > 1. The trademark search did find other software products using the name
> > Ballista as a registered trademark. What are the implications of this?
> Will
> > I need to remove use of that name from the PR before proceeding to a
> vote?
>
> I'd say no. The Arrow PMC will need to decide on the name to use going
> forward. Remember that the trademark law is intended to avoid confusion of
> consumers in the marketplace.
>
> The PMC will ask if anyone will be confused between e.g.
> https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/ballista/index.html and
> https://github.com/ballista-compute/ballista . But that only applies if
> the PMC decides to keep the name of the sub-project. There is no reason to
> change the name of your git project before moving the code to Arrow. Once
> it's in the Arrow repository you can make the changes to file/directory
> names and copyright notices, etc.
>
> >
> > 2. What do I do about the checklist item "Check that all active
> committers
> > have a signed CLA on record"? Do I go ahead and put a date against it and
> > add additional text stating that not all contributors have submitted a
> CLA?
>
> Yes, here is where an essay is required in response. Include the names of
> the folks who have not responded to your request and the size of their
> contributions, and the risk in case they don't file an ICLA and later show
> up demanding that you remove their contributions.
>
> Regards,
> Craig
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:32 PM Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> This is just my opinion; others may have different ideas.
> >>
> >> I'm considering that the project is licensed under the terms of the
> Apache
> >> License, v2.0 and I'm assuming that the contributors knew that when they
> >> made their contributions.
> >>
> >> I'd continue to try to obtain ICLAs from the other contributors (not
> just
> >> the 5 with >1 commit but all of them).
> >>
> >> I'd guess that you won't get every single contributor to file an ICLA
> but
> >> it's probably ok to continue to a vote.
> >>
> >> The only risk that I see is one of the contributors later has a change
> of
> >> mind, decides that they didn't understand that this is an open source
> >> project intended to be licensed under the terms of the ALv2.0 and then
> >> complains. At that point, the project might decide that they need to
> >> rewrite the contributor's code in order to remove the nuisance.
> >>
> >> So I'd say to go ahead and expect that the contributors who fail to
> submit
> >> an ICLA are just not interested and will fade into history without any
> >> trouble.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Craig
> >>
> >>> On Mar 30, 2021, at 7:31 AM, Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, Dave.
> >>>
> >>> To give an update on the situation, out of the 12 committers with > 1
> >>> commit, we have ICLAs submitted or already on file for 7 of those,
> >>> including all the contributors that I would consider key to the
> project.
> >> I
> >>> have been unable to get any response from the other 5 so far.
> >>>
> >>> Based on this, should I consider moving to a vote now or wait and see
> if
> >> I
> >>> can get more signed ICLAs?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Andy.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:00 AM Dave Fisher <wa...@comcast.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi -
> >>>>
> >>>> Since this is Andy’s project under the Apache License then I’m not
> sure
> >>>> that other’s ICLA matters. But ...
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Mar 25, 2021, at 8:25 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Andy
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Typically you would look at the top contributors and aim for ICLAs
> from
> >>>>> those. Don't forget you have to have a vote here as well when done!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would aim for these individuals:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 231 Andy Grove
> >>>>> 27 Ximo Guanter
> >>>>> 7 QP Hou
> >>>>> 6 Boaz Berman
> >>>>> 5 Daniël Heres
> >>>>> 4 Jack Chan
> >>>>> 4 Patrick More
> >>>>> 3 Ben Cohen
> >>>>> 3 Hendrik Makait
> >>>>> 3 Jorge Leitao
> >>>>> 2 Hamish Nicholson
> >>>>> 2 Tanapol Prucksakorn
> >>>>
> >>>> I would look more into the nature of these commits. Who would you ask
> to
> >>>> be a committer?
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Dave
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> John
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:18 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The Apache Arrow PMC has passed a vote to accept the donation of the
> >>>>>> Ballista project [1].
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The donation contains code from ~30 contributors and it may not be
> >>>> possible
> >>>>>> to obtain ICLAs from all of them. If this does turn out to be the
> >>>>>> situation, what steps can we take instead?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Andy.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9723
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> Craig L Russell
> >> clr@apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> Craig L Russell
> clr@apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: Looking for guidance on IP clearance process for donation to
Apache Arrow
Posted by Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>.
Hi Andy,
> On Apr 3, 2021, at 8:22 AM, Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for that advice, Craig.
>
> I have gone ahead and created
> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-rust-ballista.html in
> preparation for the vote and I have a couple more questions now:
>
> 1. The trademark search did find other software products using the name
> Ballista as a registered trademark. What are the implications of this? Will
> I need to remove use of that name from the PR before proceeding to a vote?
I'd say no. The Arrow PMC will need to decide on the name to use going forward. Remember that the trademark law is intended to avoid confusion of consumers in the marketplace.
The PMC will ask if anyone will be confused between e.g. https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/ballista/index.html and
https://github.com/ballista-compute/ballista . But that only applies if the PMC decides to keep the name of the sub-project. There is no reason to change the name of your git project before moving the code to Arrow. Once it's in the Arrow repository you can make the changes to file/directory names and copyright notices, etc.
>
> 2. What do I do about the checklist item "Check that all active committers
> have a signed CLA on record"? Do I go ahead and put a date against it and
> add additional text stating that not all contributors have submitted a CLA?
Yes, here is where an essay is required in response. Include the names of the folks who have not responded to your request and the size of their contributions, and the risk in case they don't file an ICLA and later show up demanding that you remove their contributions.
Regards,
Craig
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy.
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:32 PM Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is just my opinion; others may have different ideas.
>>
>> I'm considering that the project is licensed under the terms of the Apache
>> License, v2.0 and I'm assuming that the contributors knew that when they
>> made their contributions.
>>
>> I'd continue to try to obtain ICLAs from the other contributors (not just
>> the 5 with >1 commit but all of them).
>>
>> I'd guess that you won't get every single contributor to file an ICLA but
>> it's probably ok to continue to a vote.
>>
>> The only risk that I see is one of the contributors later has a change of
>> mind, decides that they didn't understand that this is an open source
>> project intended to be licensed under the terms of the ALv2.0 and then
>> complains. At that point, the project might decide that they need to
>> rewrite the contributor's code in order to remove the nuisance.
>>
>> So I'd say to go ahead and expect that the contributors who fail to submit
>> an ICLA are just not interested and will fade into history without any
>> trouble.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Craig
>>
>>> On Mar 30, 2021, at 7:31 AM, Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks, Dave.
>>>
>>> To give an update on the situation, out of the 12 committers with > 1
>>> commit, we have ICLAs submitted or already on file for 7 of those,
>>> including all the contributors that I would consider key to the project.
>> I
>>> have been unable to get any response from the other 5 so far.
>>>
>>> Based on this, should I consider moving to a vote now or wait and see if
>> I
>>> can get more signed ICLAs?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Andy.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:00 AM Dave Fisher <wa...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi -
>>>>
>>>> Since this is Andy’s project under the Apache License then I’m not sure
>>>> that other’s ICLA matters. But ...
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 25, 2021, at 8:25 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Andy
>>>>>
>>>>> Typically you would look at the top contributors and aim for ICLAs from
>>>>> those. Don't forget you have to have a vote here as well when done!
>>>>>
>>>>> I would aim for these individuals:
>>>>>
>>>>> 231 Andy Grove
>>>>> 27 Ximo Guanter
>>>>> 7 QP Hou
>>>>> 6 Boaz Berman
>>>>> 5 Daniël Heres
>>>>> 4 Jack Chan
>>>>> 4 Patrick More
>>>>> 3 Ben Cohen
>>>>> 3 Hendrik Makait
>>>>> 3 Jorge Leitao
>>>>> 2 Hamish Nicholson
>>>>> 2 Tanapol Prucksakorn
>>>>
>>>> I would look more into the nature of these commits. Who would you ask to
>>>> be a committer?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:18 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Apache Arrow PMC has passed a vote to accept the donation of the
>>>>>> Ballista project [1].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The donation contains code from ~30 contributors and it may not be
>>>> possible
>>>>>> to obtain ICLAs from all of them. If this does turn out to be the
>>>>>> situation, what steps can we take instead?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9723
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> clr@apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
Craig L Russell
clr@apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Looking for guidance on IP clearance process for donation to
Apache Arrow
Posted by Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for that advice, Craig.
I have gone ahead and created
https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-rust-ballista.html in
preparation for the vote and I have a couple more questions now:
1. The trademark search did find other software products using the name
Ballista as a registered trademark. What are the implications of this? Will
I need to remove use of that name from the PR before proceeding to a vote?
2. What do I do about the checklist item "Check that all active committers
have a signed CLA on record"? Do I go ahead and put a date against it and
add additional text stating that not all contributors have submitted a CLA?
Thanks,
Andy.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:32 PM Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is just my opinion; others may have different ideas.
>
> I'm considering that the project is licensed under the terms of the Apache
> License, v2.0 and I'm assuming that the contributors knew that when they
> made their contributions.
>
> I'd continue to try to obtain ICLAs from the other contributors (not just
> the 5 with >1 commit but all of them).
>
> I'd guess that you won't get every single contributor to file an ICLA but
> it's probably ok to continue to a vote.
>
> The only risk that I see is one of the contributors later has a change of
> mind, decides that they didn't understand that this is an open source
> project intended to be licensed under the terms of the ALv2.0 and then
> complains. At that point, the project might decide that they need to
> rewrite the contributor's code in order to remove the nuisance.
>
> So I'd say to go ahead and expect that the contributors who fail to submit
> an ICLA are just not interested and will fade into history without any
> trouble.
>
> Regards,
> Craig
>
> > On Mar 30, 2021, at 7:31 AM, Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Dave.
> >
> > To give an update on the situation, out of the 12 committers with > 1
> > commit, we have ICLAs submitted or already on file for 7 of those,
> > including all the contributors that I would consider key to the project.
> I
> > have been unable to get any response from the other 5 so far.
> >
> > Based on this, should I consider moving to a vote now or wait and see if
> I
> > can get more signed ICLAs?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:00 AM Dave Fisher <wa...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi -
> >>
> >> Since this is Andy’s project under the Apache License then I’m not sure
> >> that other’s ICLA matters. But ...
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >>> On Mar 25, 2021, at 8:25 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Andy
> >>>
> >>> Typically you would look at the top contributors and aim for ICLAs from
> >>> those. Don't forget you have to have a vote here as well when done!
> >>>
> >>> I would aim for these individuals:
> >>>
> >>> 231 Andy Grove
> >>> 27 Ximo Guanter
> >>> 7 QP Hou
> >>> 6 Boaz Berman
> >>> 5 Daniël Heres
> >>> 4 Jack Chan
> >>> 4 Patrick More
> >>> 3 Ben Cohen
> >>> 3 Hendrik Makait
> >>> 3 Jorge Leitao
> >>> 2 Hamish Nicholson
> >>> 2 Tanapol Prucksakorn
> >>
> >> I would look more into the nature of these commits. Who would you ask to
> >> be a committer?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> John
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:18 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> The Apache Arrow PMC has passed a vote to accept the donation of the
> >>>> Ballista project [1].
> >>>>
> >>>> The donation contains code from ~30 contributors and it may not be
> >> possible
> >>>> to obtain ICLAs from all of them. If this does turn out to be the
> >>>> situation, what steps can we take instead?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Andy.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9723
> >>>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> Craig L Russell
> clr@apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: Looking for guidance on IP clearance process for donation to
Apache Arrow
Posted by Craig Russell <ap...@gmail.com>.
This is just my opinion; others may have different ideas.
I'm considering that the project is licensed under the terms of the Apache License, v2.0 and I'm assuming that the contributors knew that when they made their contributions.
I'd continue to try to obtain ICLAs from the other contributors (not just the 5 with >1 commit but all of them).
I'd guess that you won't get every single contributor to file an ICLA but it's probably ok to continue to a vote.
The only risk that I see is one of the contributors later has a change of mind, decides that they didn't understand that this is an open source project intended to be licensed under the terms of the ALv2.0 and then complains. At that point, the project might decide that they need to rewrite the contributor's code in order to remove the nuisance.
So I'd say to go ahead and expect that the contributors who fail to submit an ICLA are just not interested and will fade into history without any trouble.
Regards,
Craig
> On Mar 30, 2021, at 7:31 AM, Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Dave.
>
> To give an update on the situation, out of the 12 committers with > 1
> commit, we have ICLAs submitted or already on file for 7 of those,
> including all the contributors that I would consider key to the project. I
> have been unable to get any response from the other 5 so far.
>
> Based on this, should I consider moving to a vote now or wait and see if I
> can get more signed ICLAs?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy.
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:00 AM Dave Fisher <wa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi -
>>
>> Since this is Andy’s project under the Apache License then I’m not sure
>> that other’s ICLA matters. But ...
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Mar 25, 2021, at 8:25 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Andy
>>>
>>> Typically you would look at the top contributors and aim for ICLAs from
>>> those. Don't forget you have to have a vote here as well when done!
>>>
>>> I would aim for these individuals:
>>>
>>> 231 Andy Grove
>>> 27 Ximo Guanter
>>> 7 QP Hou
>>> 6 Boaz Berman
>>> 5 Daniël Heres
>>> 4 Jack Chan
>>> 4 Patrick More
>>> 3 Ben Cohen
>>> 3 Hendrik Makait
>>> 3 Jorge Leitao
>>> 2 Hamish Nicholson
>>> 2 Tanapol Prucksakorn
>>
>> I would look more into the nature of these commits. Who would you ask to
>> be a committer?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:18 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The Apache Arrow PMC has passed a vote to accept the donation of the
>>>> Ballista project [1].
>>>>
>>>> The donation contains code from ~30 contributors and it may not be
>> possible
>>>> to obtain ICLAs from all of them. If this does turn out to be the
>>>> situation, what steps can we take instead?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Andy.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9723
>>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
Craig L Russell
clr@apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Looking for guidance on IP clearance process for donation to
Apache Arrow
Posted by Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, Dave.
To give an update on the situation, out of the 12 committers with > 1
commit, we have ICLAs submitted or already on file for 7 of those,
including all the contributors that I would consider key to the project. I
have been unable to get any response from the other 5 so far.
Based on this, should I consider moving to a vote now or wait and see if I
can get more signed ICLAs?
Thanks,
Andy.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:00 AM Dave Fisher <wa...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Since this is Andy’s project under the Apache License then I’m not sure
> that other’s ICLA matters. But ...
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Mar 25, 2021, at 8:25 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Andy
> >
> > Typically you would look at the top contributors and aim for ICLAs from
> > those. Don't forget you have to have a vote here as well when done!
> >
> > I would aim for these individuals:
> >
> > 231 Andy Grove
> > 27 Ximo Guanter
> > 7 QP Hou
> > 6 Boaz Berman
> > 5 Daniël Heres
> > 4 Jack Chan
> > 4 Patrick More
> > 3 Ben Cohen
> > 3 Hendrik Makait
> > 3 Jorge Leitao
> > 2 Hamish Nicholson
> > 2 Tanapol Prucksakorn
>
> I would look more into the nature of these commits. Who would you ask to
> be a committer?
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> >
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:18 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The Apache Arrow PMC has passed a vote to accept the donation of the
> >> Ballista project [1].
> >>
> >> The donation contains code from ~30 contributors and it may not be
> possible
> >> to obtain ICLAs from all of them. If this does turn out to be the
> >> situation, what steps can we take instead?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Andy.
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9723
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: Looking for guidance on IP clearance process for donation to Apache Arrow
Posted by Dave Fisher <wa...@comcast.net>.
Hi -
Since this is Andy’s project under the Apache License then I’m not sure that other’s ICLA matters. But ...
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 25, 2021, at 8:25 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Andy
>
> Typically you would look at the top contributors and aim for ICLAs from
> those. Don't forget you have to have a vote here as well when done!
>
> I would aim for these individuals:
>
> 231 Andy Grove
> 27 Ximo Guanter
> 7 QP Hou
> 6 Boaz Berman
> 5 Daniël Heres
> 4 Jack Chan
> 4 Patrick More
> 3 Ben Cohen
> 3 Hendrik Makait
> 3 Jorge Leitao
> 2 Hamish Nicholson
> 2 Tanapol Prucksakorn
I would look more into the nature of these commits. Who would you ask to be a committer?
Regards,
Dave
>
>
> John
>
>
>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:18 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The Apache Arrow PMC has passed a vote to accept the donation of the
>> Ballista project [1].
>>
>> The donation contains code from ~30 contributors and it may not be possible
>> to obtain ICLAs from all of them. If this does turn out to be the
>> situation, what steps can we take instead?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Andy.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9723
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Looking for guidance on IP clearance process for donation to
Apache Arrow
Posted by Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, John. I appreciate the advice.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 9:25 AM John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Andy
>
> Typically you would look at the top contributors and aim for ICLAs from
> those. Don't forget you have to have a vote here as well when done!
>
> I would aim for these individuals:
>
> 231 Andy Grove
> 27 Ximo Guanter
> 7 QP Hou
> 6 Boaz Berman
> 5 Daniël Heres
> 4 Jack Chan
> 4 Patrick More
> 3 Ben Cohen
> 3 Hendrik Makait
> 3 Jorge Leitao
> 2 Hamish Nicholson
> 2 Tanapol Prucksakorn
>
>
> John
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:18 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Apache Arrow PMC has passed a vote to accept the donation of the
> > Ballista project [1].
> >
> > The donation contains code from ~30 contributors and it may not be
> possible
> > to obtain ICLAs from all of them. If this does turn out to be the
> > situation, what steps can we take instead?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9723
> >
>
Re: Looking for guidance on IP clearance process for donation to
Apache Arrow
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Hi Andy
Typically you would look at the top contributors and aim for ICLAs from
those. Don't forget you have to have a vote here as well when done!
I would aim for these individuals:
231 Andy Grove
27 Ximo Guanter
7 QP Hou
6 Boaz Berman
5 Daniël Heres
4 Jack Chan
4 Patrick More
3 Ben Cohen
3 Hendrik Makait
3 Jorge Leitao
2 Hamish Nicholson
2 Tanapol Prucksakorn
John
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:18 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Apache Arrow PMC has passed a vote to accept the donation of the
> Ballista project [1].
>
> The donation contains code from ~30 contributors and it may not be possible
> to obtain ICLAs from all of them. If this does turn out to be the
> situation, what steps can we take instead?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9723
>