You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Andre Fischer <af...@a-w-f.de> on 2012/06/26 09:38:27 UTC

[RELEASE][3.4.1] Requesting bug 120082 as release blocker (Temporary files of extension installation are not deleted)

Issue 120082 [1] fixes a part of the problem of excessive disk space 
consumption by extensions (see issue 119272 [2] for details).  The fix 
reduces the used disk space by 50%.  It does so by removing unused 
temporary files.

The probability of regression is moderate but not zero.

Regards,
Andre



[1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120082
[2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119272

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1] Requesting bug 120082 as release blocker (Temporary files of extension installation are not deleted)

Posted by Herbert Duerr <hd...@apache.org>.
On 26.06.2012 09:38, Andre Fischer wrote:
> Issue 120082 [1] fixes a part of the problem of excessive disk space
> consumption by extensions (see issue 119272 [2] for details).  The fix
> reduces the used disk space by 50%.  It does so by removing unused
> temporary files.

Saving 80MB for a typical user installation is worth it and should get 
into the next release. PackageManager does not need the temporary files 
when it is done with installing an extension and so I can't think of a 
scenario where cleaning these files up would cause problems.

Herbert

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1] Requesting bug 120082 as release blocker (Temporary files of extension installation are not deleted)

Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 6/26/12 9:38 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> Issue 120082 [1] fixes a part of the problem of excessive disk space
> consumption by extensions (see issue 119272 [2] for details).  The fix
> reduces the used disk space by 50%.  It does so by removing unused
> temporary files.
> 
> The probability of regression is moderate but not zero.
> 

+1 from my opinion it is worth to include it in 3.4.1


Juergen

> Regards,
> Andre
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120082
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119272

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1] Requesting bug 120082 as release blocker (Temporary files of extension installation are not deleted)

Posted by Andre Fischer <af...@a-w-f.de>.
Merge done.

On 26.06.2012 09:38, Andre Fischer wrote:
> Issue 120082 [1] fixes a part of the problem of excessive disk space
> consumption by extensions (see issue 119272 [2] for details).  The fix
> reduces the used disk space by 50%.  It does so by removing unused
> temporary files.
>
> The probability of regression is moderate but not zero.
>
> Regards,
> Andre
>
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120082
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119272

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1] Requesting bug 120082 as release blocker (Temporary files of extension installation are not deleted)

Posted by "O.Felka" <ol...@gmx.de>.
+ 1

Groetjes,
Olaf

Am 26.06.2012 10:44, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
> +1
>
> Best regards, Oliver.
>
> On 26.06.2012 09:38, Andre Fischer wrote:
>> Issue 120082 [1] fixes a part of the problem of excessive disk space
>> consumption
>> by extensions (see issue 119272 [2] for details).  The fix reduces the
>> used disk
>> space by 50%.  It does so by removing unused temporary files.
>>
>> The probability of regression is moderate but not zero.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andre
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120082
>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119272
>
>

Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1] Requesting bug 120082 as release blocker (Temporary files of extension installation are not deleted)

Posted by Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <or...@googlemail.com>.
+1

Best regards, Oliver.

On 26.06.2012 09:38, Andre Fischer wrote:
> Issue 120082 [1] fixes a part of the problem of excessive disk space consumption
> by extensions (see issue 119272 [2] for details).  The fix reduces the used disk
> space by 50%.  It does so by removing unused temporary files.
>
> The probability of regression is moderate but not zero.
>
> Regards,
> Andre
>
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120082
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119272