You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Andrea Cosentino (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/10/03 09:25:00 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (CAMEL-12852) Fix unstable test
PubNubPresenceTest
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-12852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Andrea Cosentino reassigned CAMEL-12852:
----------------------------------------
Assignee: Andrea Cosentino
> Fix unstable test PubNubPresenceTest
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-12852
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-12852
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tests
> Reporter: Aurélien Pupier
> Assignee: Andrea Cosentino
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.21.3, 2.22.2, 2.23.0
>
>
> sometimes it is failing with
> https://fusesource-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/camel.redhat.pipeline/job/2.21.x.redhat-7-0-x/18/testReport/junit/org.apache.camel.component.pubnub/PubNubPresenceTest/testPresence/
> {quote}Error Message
> mock://result Received message count. Expected: <1> but was: <2>
> Stacktrace
> java.lang.AssertionError: mock://result Received message count. Expected: <1> but was: <2>
> at org.apache.camel.component.pubnub.PubNubPresenceTest.testPresence(PubNubPresenceTest.java:53){quote}
> the problem is that in fact a lot of exchanges are created.
> In org.apache.camel.component.mock.MockEndpoint.doAssertIsSatisfied(long), it is waiting to reach at least the given expected number in the provided timeout.
> As soon as it is reached, it is doing the assertion.
> But between the assertion done in the line just after, a new message may arrive.
> You can notice it by putting a Thread.sleep(1000) for instance before the assertEquals, with PubNubTest it wil lalways fail and there will be a lo tmore messages.
> So 3 possibilities:
> - the test should expect a minimum number of messages
> - the route used in test should be modified to trigger a single message
> - the camel product should not create several messages and in this case it is a product bug
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)