You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org> on 2008/02/05 11:30:02 UTC
[VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
According to previous discution, the maven -sources.jar bundles that haven't
yet been deployed on maven "central" repository require a PMC vote.
They are just a repackaging of the original -src.zip source distribution,
and are NOT considered as a new release of the considered apache commons
components but only a re-packaging.
staging at http://people.apache.org/~nicolas/missing-commons-sources.jar
Vote open for 72 hours.
[ ] commons-beanutils-1.6-sources.jar
[ ] commons-betwixt-0.5-sources.jar
[ ] commons-betwixt-0.8-sources.jar
[ ] commons-betwixt-1.0-alpha-1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-codec-1.1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-codec-1.2-sources.jar
[ ] commons-configuration-1.0-sources.jar
[ ] commons-dbcp-1.0-sources.jar
[ ] commons-dbcp-1.1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-dbcp-1.2-sources.jar
[ ] commons-dbcp-1.2.2-sources.jar
[ ] commons-dbutils-1.0-sources.jar
[ ] commons-discovery-0.4-sources.jar
[ ] commons-email-1.0-sources.jar
[ ] commons-email-1.1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-fileupload-1.1.1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-httpclient-3.1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-jexl-1.1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-jxpath-1.1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-jxpath-1.2-sources.jar
[ ] commons-launcher-1.1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-logging-1.0.3-sources.jar
[ ] commons-math-1.0-sources.jar
[ ] commons-math-1.1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-modeler-2.0-sources.jar
[ ] commons-net-1.0.0-sources.jar
[ ] commons-net-1.1.0-sources.jar
[ ] commons-net-1.2.0-sources.jar
[ ] commons-net-1.2.1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-net-1.2.2-sources.jar
[ ] commons-net-1.3.0-sources.jar
[ ] commons-pool-1.0-sources.jar
[ ] commons-pool-1.0.1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-pool-1.1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-pool-1.3-sources.jar
[ ] commons-pool-1.4-sources.jar
[ ] commons-primitives-1.0-sources.jar
[ ] commons-scxml-0.5-sources.jar
[ ] commons-scxml-0.6-sources.jar
[ ] commons-scxml-0.7-sources.jar
[ ] commons-transaction-1.0-sources.jar
[ ] commons-transaction-1.0.1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-transaction-1.1-sources.jar
[ ] commons-transaction-1.2-sources.jar
[ ] commons-validator-1.0.2-sources.jar
[ ] commons-validator-1.1.3-sources.jar
[ ] commons-vfs-1.0-sources.jar
Regards,
Nico.
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org>.
Right,
Nico.
2008/2/5, Torsten Curdt <tc...@apache.org>:
>
> I suggest we cancel/postpone the vote until we hear back from the board.
> I've just sent the mail.
>
> cheers
> --
> Torsten
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by Torsten Curdt <tc...@apache.org>.
I suggest we cancel/postpone the vote until we hear back from the board.
I've just sent the mail.
cheers
--
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 5, 2008 2:58 PM, nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
> Most public artifacts on maven "central" have no such cource bundles, even
> recent ones when built with maven. see commons-httpclient 3.1 :-/
In that case, commons-httpclient is
- not using a Maven 2 build
- either not using the commons-parent
- not building its distribution with -Prelease
- or not deploying the -source.jar and -javadoc.jar files.
Jochen
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org>.
The issue is not to produce those source bundles, but to get them from
project dependencies from public repositories.
Most public artifacts on maven "central" have no such cource bundles, even
recent ones when built with maven. see commons-httpclient 3.1 :-/
The issue discussed here is to repackage archived commons- releases to
complete those missing bundles.
Nico.
2008/2/5, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>:
>
> 2008/2/5, sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Maven could/should be changed to use -src.zip if -sources.jar is
> > missing ... seems to me that would be much less effort overall.
>
> I do not know where you do see the problem with Maven. The projects
> using M2 builds with the commons-parent POM *and* building
> distributions with -Prelease will automatically have -source.jar *and*
> -javadoc.jar files automatically.
>
> Jochen
>
> --
> Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
> you break 'em.
>
> -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
2008/2/5, sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
>
> Maven could/should be changed to use -src.zip if -sources.jar is
> missing ... seems to me that would be much less effort overall.
I do not know where you do see the problem with Maven. The projects
using M2 builds with the commons-parent POM *and* building
distributions with -Prelease will automatically have -source.jar *and*
-javadoc.jar files automatically.
Jochen
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
Because some IDEs already support source zips.
There are also far fewer IDEs than there are missing source jars.
S///
On 05/02/2008, Torsten Curdt <tc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yeah ...I can also not see how that is LESS effort.
>
> cheers
> --
> Torsten
>
>
> On 05.02.2008, at 13:48, nicolas de loof wrote:
>
> > Right,
> >
> > maven SHOULD support those source distribution bundles,
> > eclipse, netbeans and idea SHOULD support them also
> > all of them SHOULD support heterogeneous folders (src/java, src/
> > main/java,
> > src/share ...) in such archives.
> >
> > ... much less effort ?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by Torsten Curdt <tc...@apache.org>.
Yeah ...I can also not see how that is LESS effort.
cheers
--
Torsten
On 05.02.2008, at 13:48, nicolas de loof wrote:
> Right,
>
> maven SHOULD support those source distribution bundles,
> eclipse, netbeans and idea SHOULD support them also
> all of them SHOULD support heterogeneous folders (src/java, src/
> main/java,
> src/share ...) in such archives.
>
> ... much less effort ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
Eclipse already does - I'm using the source zips for various commons jars..
No idea about whether Netbeans or Idea support them.
On 05/02/2008, nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
> Right,
>
> maven SHOULD support those source distribution bundles,
> eclipse, netbeans and idea SHOULD support them also
> all of them SHOULD support heterogeneous folders (src/java, src/main/java,
> src/share ...) in such archives.
>
> ... much less effort ?
>
> Nico.
>
>
> 2008/2/5, sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Maven could/should be changed to use -src.zip if -sources.jar is
> > missing ... seems to me that would be much less effort overall.
> >
> > S///
> > On 05/02/2008, nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Only -sources.jar are downloaded by maven and added to IDE for
> > > source-debugging.
> > >
> > > Existing src-dists require users to manually do the unzip & jar I've
> > done
> > >
> > > 2008/2/5, sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > -1, for the following reasons:
> > > >
> > > > - these are new distributions and all new distributions must contain
> > > > NOTICE and LICENSE files; not all of them do.
> > > > - at least one of the repackaged jars does not correspond with the
> > > > release src.zip file
> > > >
> > > > Why not just upload the existing source zip or tgz files?
> > > > No re-packaging is needed then.
> > > >
> > > > On 05/02/2008, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > -0: I do not agree that a "re-packaging" does not qualify as a
> > > > > distribution. But I am no lawyer. Therefore, I won't block.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
> > > > > you break 'em.
> > > > >
> > > > > -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org>.
Right,
maven SHOULD support those source distribution bundles,
eclipse, netbeans and idea SHOULD support them also
all of them SHOULD support heterogeneous folders (src/java, src/main/java,
src/share ...) in such archives.
... much less effort ?
Nico.
2008/2/5, sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
>
> Maven could/should be changed to use -src.zip if -sources.jar is
> missing ... seems to me that would be much less effort overall.
>
> S///
> On 05/02/2008, nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Only -sources.jar are downloaded by maven and added to IDE for
> > source-debugging.
> >
> > Existing src-dists require users to manually do the unzip & jar I've
> done
> >
> > 2008/2/5, sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > -1, for the following reasons:
> > >
> > > - these are new distributions and all new distributions must contain
> > > NOTICE and LICENSE files; not all of them do.
> > > - at least one of the repackaged jars does not correspond with the
> > > release src.zip file
> > >
> > > Why not just upload the existing source zip or tgz files?
> > > No re-packaging is needed then.
> > >
> > > On 05/02/2008, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > -0: I do not agree that a "re-packaging" does not qualify as a
> > > > distribution. But I am no lawyer. Therefore, I won't block.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
> > > > you break 'em.
> > > >
> > > > -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
Maven could/should be changed to use -src.zip if -sources.jar is
missing ... seems to me that would be much less effort overall.
S///
On 05/02/2008, nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
> Only -sources.jar are downloaded by maven and added to IDE for
> source-debugging.
>
> Existing src-dists require users to manually do the unzip & jar I've done
>
> 2008/2/5, sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > -1, for the following reasons:
> >
> > - these are new distributions and all new distributions must contain
> > NOTICE and LICENSE files; not all of them do.
> > - at least one of the repackaged jars does not correspond with the
> > release src.zip file
> >
> > Why not just upload the existing source zip or tgz files?
> > No re-packaging is needed then.
> >
> > On 05/02/2008, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > -0: I do not agree that a "re-packaging" does not qualify as a
> > > distribution. But I am no lawyer. Therefore, I won't block.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
> > > you break 'em.
> > >
> > > -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org>.
Only -sources.jar are downloaded by maven and added to IDE for
source-debugging.
Existing src-dists require users to manually do the unzip & jar I've done
2008/2/5, sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
>
> -1, for the following reasons:
>
> - these are new distributions and all new distributions must contain
> NOTICE and LICENSE files; not all of them do.
> - at least one of the repackaged jars does not correspond with the
> release src.zip file
>
> Why not just upload the existing source zip or tgz files?
> No re-packaging is needed then.
>
> On 05/02/2008, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > -0: I do not agree that a "re-packaging" does not qualify as a
> > distribution. But I am no lawyer. Therefore, I won't block.
> >
> > --
> > Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
> > you break 'em.
> >
> > -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
-1, for the following reasons:
- these are new distributions and all new distributions must contain
NOTICE and LICENSE files; not all of them do.
- at least one of the repackaged jars does not correspond with the
release src.zip file
Why not just upload the existing source zip or tgz files?
No re-packaging is needed then.
On 05/02/2008, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -0: I do not agree that a "re-packaging" does not qualify as a
> distribution. But I am no lawyer. Therefore, I won't block.
>
> --
> Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
> you break 'em.
>
> -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
-0: I do not agree that a "re-packaging" does not qualify as a
distribution. But I am no lawyer. Therefore, I won't block.
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by Torsten Curdt <tc...@apache.org>.
Thought the agreement was to check with the board/legal about the
license files first? Or did I miss that?
cheers
--
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by Jörg Schaible <Jo...@Elsag-Solutions.com>.
+100 ... enough ? ;-)
nicolas.deloof@gmail.com wrote:
> According to previous discution, the maven -sources.jar
> bundles that haven't
> yet been deployed on maven "central" repository require a PMC vote.
>
> They are just a repackaging of the original -src.zip source
> distribution, and are NOT considered as a new release of the
> considered
> apache commons
> components but only a re-packaging.
>
> staging at
> http://people.apache.org/~nicolas/missing-commons-sources.jar
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] commons-beanutils-1.6-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-betwixt-0.5-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-betwixt-0.8-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-betwixt-1.0-alpha-1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-codec-1.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-codec-1.2-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-configuration-1.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-dbcp-1.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-dbcp-1.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-dbcp-1.2-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-dbcp-1.2.2-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-dbutils-1.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-discovery-0.4-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-email-1.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-email-1.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-fileupload-1.1.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-httpclient-3.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-jexl-1.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-jxpath-1.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-jxpath-1.2-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-launcher-1.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-logging-1.0.3-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-math-1.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-math-1.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-modeler-2.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-net-1.0.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-net-1.1.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-net-1.2.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-net-1.2.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-net-1.2.2-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-net-1.3.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-pool-1.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-pool-1.0.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-pool-1.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-pool-1.3-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-pool-1.4-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-primitives-1.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-scxml-0.5-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-scxml-0.6-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-scxml-0.7-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-transaction-1.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-transaction-1.0.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-transaction-1.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-transaction-1.2-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-validator-1.0.2-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-validator-1.1.3-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-vfs-1.0-sources.jar
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nico.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org>.
I just fixed commons-httpclient to include the NOTICE.txt in META-INF
commons-betwixt 0.5 and commons-jxpath 1.2 source distribution in
http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/betwixt/source/ does not contain the
required NOTICE...
I've added it manually to fix the source.jars
commons-pool 1.0 is ASL 1.1, but the License file does not uses the ".txt"
extension found in other source distributions. Fixed in the source.jar
Nico.
2008/2/5, Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>:
>
> On Feb 5, 2008 10:30 AM, nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
> > According to previous discution, the maven -sources.jar bundles that
> haven't
> > yet been deployed on maven "central" repository require a PMC vote.
> >
> > They are just a repackaging of the original -src.zip source
> distribution,
> > and are NOT considered as a new release of the considered apache commons
> > components but only a re-packaging.
> >
> > staging at http://people.apache.org/~nicolas/missing-commons-sources.jar
> >
> > Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> I don't see why people are voting -1 on all of this when its only
> certain jars in question. IMO those that have an AL 2.0 and NOTICE
> file are good to go. Those with missing bits should be -1 (betwixt
> 0.5, httpclient 3.1, jxpath 1.2, pool 1.0) and the AL 1.1 (which
> doesn't require a NOTICE file) versions its just a question of finding
> out if we can release these under AL 1.1
>
> So my votes are below
>
> Niall
>
>
> > [ ] commons-beanutils-1.6-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ -1 ] commons-betwixt-0.5-sources.jar - AL 2.0 LICENSE, no NOTICE
> > [ +1 ] commons-betwixt-0.8-sources.jar
> > [ ] commons-betwixt-1.0-alpha-1-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ ] commons-codec-1.1-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ ] commons-codec-1.2-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ +1 ] commons-configuration-1.0-sources.jar
> > [ ] commons-dbcp-1.0-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ ] commons-dbcp-1.1-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ +1 ] commons-dbcp-1.2-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-dbcp-1.2.2-sources.jar
> > [ ] commons-dbutils-1.0-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ +1 ] commons-discovery-0.4-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-email-1.0-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-email-1.1-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-fileupload-1.1.1-sources.jar
> > [ -1 ] commons-httpclient-3.1-sources.jar - no LICENSE (has NOTICE)
> > [ +1 ] commons-jexl-1.1-sources.jar
> > [ ] commons-jxpath-1.1-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ -1 ] commons-jxpath-1.2-sources.jar - AL 2.0 LICENSE, no NOTICE
> > [ +1 ] commons-launcher-1.1-sources.jar
> > [ ] commons-logging-1.0.3-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ +1 ] commons-math-1.0-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-math-1.1-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-modeler-2.0-sources.jar
> > [ ] commons-net-1.0.0-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ ] commons-net-1.1.0-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ +1 ] commons-net-1.2.0-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-net-1.2.1-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-net-1.2.2-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-net-1.3.0-sources.jar
> > [ -1 ] commons-pool-1.0-sources.jar - No LICENSE or NOTICE
> > [ ] commons-pool-1.0.1-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ ] commons-pool-1.1-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ +1 ] commons-pool-1.3-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-pool-1.4-sources.jar
> > [ ] commons-primitives-1.0-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ +1 ] commons-scxml-0.5-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-scxml-0.6-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-scxml-0.7-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-transaction-1.0-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-transaction-1.0.1-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-transaction-1.1-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-transaction-1.2-sources.jar
> > [ ] commons-validator-1.0.2-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> > [ +1 ] commons-validator-1.1.3-sources.jar
> > [ +1 ] commons-vfs-1.0-sources.jar
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Nico.
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 5, 2008 10:30 AM, nicolas de loof <ni...@apache.org> wrote:
> According to previous discution, the maven -sources.jar bundles that haven't
> yet been deployed on maven "central" repository require a PMC vote.
>
> They are just a repackaging of the original -src.zip source distribution,
> and are NOT considered as a new release of the considered apache commons
> components but only a re-packaging.
>
> staging at http://people.apache.org/~nicolas/missing-commons-sources.jar
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
I don't see why people are voting -1 on all of this when its only
certain jars in question. IMO those that have an AL 2.0 and NOTICE
file are good to go. Those with missing bits should be -1 (betwixt
0.5, httpclient 3.1, jxpath 1.2, pool 1.0) and the AL 1.1 (which
doesn't require a NOTICE file) versions its just a question of finding
out if we can release these under AL 1.1
So my votes are below
Niall
> [ ] commons-beanutils-1.6-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ -1 ] commons-betwixt-0.5-sources.jar - AL 2.0 LICENSE, no NOTICE
> [ +1 ] commons-betwixt-0.8-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-betwixt-1.0-alpha-1-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ ] commons-codec-1.1-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ ] commons-codec-1.2-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ +1 ] commons-configuration-1.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-dbcp-1.0-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ ] commons-dbcp-1.1-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ +1 ] commons-dbcp-1.2-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-dbcp-1.2.2-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-dbutils-1.0-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ +1 ] commons-discovery-0.4-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-email-1.0-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-email-1.1-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-fileupload-1.1.1-sources.jar
> [ -1 ] commons-httpclient-3.1-sources.jar - no LICENSE (has NOTICE)
> [ +1 ] commons-jexl-1.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-jxpath-1.1-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ -1 ] commons-jxpath-1.2-sources.jar - AL 2.0 LICENSE, no NOTICE
> [ +1 ] commons-launcher-1.1-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-logging-1.0.3-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ +1 ] commons-math-1.0-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-math-1.1-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-modeler-2.0-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-net-1.0.0-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ ] commons-net-1.1.0-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ +1 ] commons-net-1.2.0-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-net-1.2.1-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-net-1.2.2-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-net-1.3.0-sources.jar
> [ -1 ] commons-pool-1.0-sources.jar - No LICENSE or NOTICE
> [ ] commons-pool-1.0.1-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ ] commons-pool-1.1-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ +1 ] commons-pool-1.3-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-pool-1.4-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-primitives-1.0-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ +1 ] commons-scxml-0.5-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-scxml-0.6-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-scxml-0.7-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-transaction-1.0-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-transaction-1.0.1-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-transaction-1.1-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-transaction-1.2-sources.jar
> [ ] commons-validator-1.0.2-sources.jar - AL 1.1 LICENSE
> [ +1 ] commons-validator-1.1.3-sources.jar
> [ +1 ] commons-vfs-1.0-sources.jar
> Regards,
>
> Nico.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org