You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> on 2006/06/28 21:09:21 UTC
Renaming of the archetypes
Hi there,
To follow the conventions, I think we should rename the archetypes to:
maven-archetype-myfaces
maven-archetype-jsfcomponents
Then, update the poms and documentation. I am going to do this if no
one objects ;)
Cheers!
Bruno
Re: Renaming of the archetypes
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 6/28/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And maybe, after finding the best names, maybe we could think on
> releasing them, could we?
I would think right after 1.1.4 would be a good time, considering that
you'll want to set them up with a released version, and we haven't yet
managed to get 1.1.3 on ibiblio.
(Sean? Any word on signatures for 1.1.3? I haven't checked the zone;
let me know if they're done.)
--
Wendy
Re: Renaming of the archetypes
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
And maybe, after finding the best names, maybe we could think on
releasing them, could we?
Bruno
On 6/28/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah ok, I was seing the maven-* wherever I went, and I thought it was
> like the plugins, where everybody puts maven-name-plugin (even not
> being plugins from the maven project itself). But no problem, I will
> rechange once we agree in the names. Those seem fine to me :)
>
> Bruno
>
> On 6/28/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 6/28/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > To follow the conventions, I think we should rename the archetypes to:
> > >
> > > maven-archetype-myfaces
> > > maven-archetype-jsfcomponents
> > >
> > > Then, update the poms and documentation. I am going to do this if no
> > > one objects ;)
> >
> > I think the 'maven' at the front of the archetype name refers to the
> > fact that Maven-the-project is distributing them, not that they are
> > meant for use with Maven-the-build-tool.
> >
> > IMO they should by myfaces-archetype-[something].
> >
> > myfaces-archetype-simple
> > myfaces-archetype-components <--'jsf' is implicit in the 'myfaces' part, no?
> >
> > For example, the ones for Struts are struts-archetype-xxx .
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > --
> > Wendy
> >
>
Re: Renaming of the archetypes
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
Ah ok, I was seing the maven-* wherever I went, and I thought it was
like the plugins, where everybody puts maven-name-plugin (even not
being plugins from the maven project itself). But no problem, I will
rechange once we agree in the names. Those seem fine to me :)
Bruno
On 6/28/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/28/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > To follow the conventions, I think we should rename the archetypes to:
> >
> > maven-archetype-myfaces
> > maven-archetype-jsfcomponents
> >
> > Then, update the poms and documentation. I am going to do this if no
> > one objects ;)
>
> I think the 'maven' at the front of the archetype name refers to the
> fact that Maven-the-project is distributing them, not that they are
> meant for use with Maven-the-build-tool.
>
> IMO they should by myfaces-archetype-[something].
>
> myfaces-archetype-simple
> myfaces-archetype-components <--'jsf' is implicit in the 'myfaces' part, no?
>
> For example, the ones for Struts are struts-archetype-xxx .
>
> Thoughts?
> --
> Wendy
>
RE: Renaming of the archetypes
Posted by Rick <ri...@arc-mind.com>.
+1 for I think the 'maven' at the front of the archetype name refers to the
fact that Maven-the-project is distributing them, not that they are
meant for use with Maven-the-build-tool.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:wsmoak@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 1:04 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: Renaming of the archetypes
On 6/28/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To follow the conventions, I think we should rename the archetypes to:
>
> maven-archetype-myfaces
> maven-archetype-jsfcomponents
>
> Then, update the poms and documentation. I am going to do this if no
> one objects ;)
I think the 'maven' at the front of the archetype name refers to the
fact that Maven-the-project is distributing them, not that they are
meant for use with Maven-the-build-tool.
IMO they should by myfaces-archetype-[something].
myfaces-archetype-simple
myfaces-archetype-components <--'jsf' is implicit in the 'myfaces' part,
no?
For example, the ones for Struts are struts-archetype-xxx .
Thoughts?
--
Wendy
Re: Renaming of the archetypes
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 6/28/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To follow the conventions, I think we should rename the archetypes to:
>
> maven-archetype-myfaces
> maven-archetype-jsfcomponents
>
> Then, update the poms and documentation. I am going to do this if no
> one objects ;)
I think the 'maven' at the front of the archetype name refers to the
fact that Maven-the-project is distributing them, not that they are
meant for use with Maven-the-build-tool.
IMO they should by myfaces-archetype-[something].
myfaces-archetype-simple
myfaces-archetype-components <--'jsf' is implicit in the 'myfaces' part, no?
For example, the ones for Struts are struts-archetype-xxx .
Thoughts?
--
Wendy