You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to scm-dev@maven.apache.org by Ryan Daum <rd...@informiam.com> on 2007/04/04 06:16:03 UTC
Other scms...
I know there are more SCM providers than what's on the trunk there -- what
happened to the Mercurial provider (maven-scm-provider-hg) which I submitted
patches to months ago and I was told was transferred to the SVN sandbox
repository? See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-230 ...
Is there a document on the process involved in getting an SCM provider out
into official distribution? From my experience, commenting and submitting
patches via JIRA doesn't seem to do it, as this work was submitted many
months ago and seems to have been ignored :-)
Ryan
On 4/3/07, Mike Perham <mp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not aware of any. If it's not here, it doesn't exist.
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/
>
>
> On 4/3/07, Tim Reilly <ti...@consultant.com> wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me what the state of PVCS integration is.
> > I recall some discussions a while ago that a provider for PVCS was in
> the
> > works?
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Ryan Daum
rdaum@informiam.com
Senior Developer, Toronto
647.724.5232 x 2073
Re: Other scms...
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
Ryan Daum a écrit :
> When I committed maven-scm-provider-hg it passed all unit tests.
cool.
>
> When you say latest code of maven-scm-api, this is what is in the trunk
> of the SVN repository? If I can get it to build and pass tests there,
> can it graduate to being submitted to the trunk? If so, what Maven
> release will it come out as part of?
If you update it, I'll move it to trunk.
Maven-SCM isn't part of Maven but it is used alone with the scm plugin or by release plugin, changelog plugin and Continuum.
We'll release Maven-SCM 1.0-beta-5 next week. If your provider isn't there, it will be in the next version.
Emmanuel
>
> Ryan
>
> On 4/4/07, *Emmanuel Venisse* <emmanuel@venisse.net
> <ma...@venisse.net>> wrote:
>
> et tested of course ;)
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
> > They need to be updated with latest code of maven-scm-api.
> >
> > Emmanuel
> >
> > Ryan Daum a écrit :
> >> What is the procedure for graduating from sandbox?
> >>
> >> Ryan
> >>
> >> On 4/4/07, *Mike Perham* <mperham@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>
> >> <mailto:mperham@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ah,
> right. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/scm/
> >> < http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/scm/>
> >>
> >> But until it graduates from the sandbox, it's not integrated
> into the
> >> release plugin, etc and so isn't terribly useful to the
> community at
> >> large. That's what I meant by "it doesn't exist", i.e. most
> people
> >> can't use it.
> >>
> >> mike
> >>
> >> On 4/3/07, Ryan Daum < rdaum@informiam.com
> <ma...@informiam.com>
> >> <mailto:rdaum@informiam.com <ma...@informiam.com>>>
> wrote:
> >> > I know there are more SCM providers than what's on the trunk
> >> there -- what
> >> > happened to the Mercurial provider
> (maven-scm-provider-hg) which
> >> I submitted
> >> > patches to months ago and I was told was transferred to
> the SVN
> >> sandbox
> >> > repository? See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-230 ...
> >> >
> >> > Is there a document on the process involved in getting an
> SCM
> >> provider out
> >> > into official distribution? From my experience,
> commenting and
> >> submitting
> >> > patches via JIRA doesn't seem to do it, as this work was
> >> submitted many
> >> > months ago and seems to have been ignored :-)
> >> >
> >> > Ryan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 4/3/07, Mike Perham < mperham@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>
> >> <mailto:mperham@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >> > > I'm not aware of any. If it's not here, it doesn't exist.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On 4/3/07, Tim Reilly <tim.reilly@consultant.com
> <ma...@consultant.com>
> >> <mailto: tim.reilly@consultant.com
> <ma...@consultant.com>>> wrote:
> >> > > > Can anyone tell me what the state of PVCS integration is.
> >> > > > I recall some discussions a while ago that a provider
> for
> >> PVCS was in
> >> > the
> >> > > > works?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Ryan Daum
> >> > rdaum@informiam.com <ma...@informiam.com> <mailto:
> rdaum@informiam.com <ma...@informiam.com>>
> >> > Senior Developer, Toronto
> >> > 647.724.5232 x 2073
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ryan Daum
> >> rdaum@informiam.com <ma...@informiam.com>
> <mailto:rdaum@informiam.com <ma...@informiam.com>>
> >> Senior Developer, Toronto
> >> 647.724.5232 x 2073
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ryan Daum
> rdaum@informiam.com <ma...@informiam.com>
> Senior Developer, Toronto
> 647.724.5232 x 2073
Re: Other scms...
Posted by Ryan Daum <rd...@informiam.com>.
When I committed maven-scm-provider-hg it passed all unit tests.
When you say latest code of maven-scm-api, this is what is in the trunk of
the SVN repository? If I can get it to build and pass tests there, can it
graduate to being submitted to the trunk? If so, what Maven release will it
come out as part of?
Ryan
On 4/4/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
>
> et tested of course ;)
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
> > They need to be updated with latest code of maven-scm-api.
> >
> > Emmanuel
> >
> > Ryan Daum a écrit :
> >> What is the procedure for graduating from sandbox?
> >>
> >> Ryan
> >>
> >> On 4/4/07, *Mike Perham* <mperham@gmail.com
> >> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ah, right. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/scm/
> >> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/scm/>
> >>
> >> But until it graduates from the sandbox, it's not integrated into
> the
> >> release plugin, etc and so isn't terribly useful to the community
> at
> >> large. That's what I meant by "it doesn't exist", i.e. most people
> >> can't use it.
> >>
> >> mike
> >>
> >> On 4/3/07, Ryan Daum <rdaum@informiam.com
> >> <ma...@informiam.com>> wrote:
> >> > I know there are more SCM providers than what's on the trunk
> >> there -- what
> >> > happened to the Mercurial provider (maven-scm-provider-hg) which
> >> I submitted
> >> > patches to months ago and I was told was transferred to the SVN
> >> sandbox
> >> > repository? See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-230 ...
> >> >
> >> > Is there a document on the process involved in getting an SCM
> >> provider out
> >> > into official distribution? From my experience, commenting and
> >> submitting
> >> > patches via JIRA doesn't seem to do it, as this work was
> >> submitted many
> >> > months ago and seems to have been ignored :-)
> >> >
> >> > Ryan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 4/3/07, Mike Perham < mperham@gmail.com
> >> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> > > I'm not aware of any. If it's not here, it doesn't exist.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On 4/3/07, Tim Reilly <tim.reilly@consultant.com
> >> <ma...@consultant.com>> wrote:
> >> > > > Can anyone tell me what the state of PVCS integration is.
> >> > > > I recall some discussions a while ago that a provider for
> >> PVCS was in
> >> > the
> >> > > > works?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Ryan Daum
> >> > rdaum@informiam.com <ma...@informiam.com>
> >> > Senior Developer, Toronto
> >> > 647.724.5232 x 2073
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ryan Daum
> >> rdaum@informiam.com <ma...@informiam.com>
> >> Senior Developer, Toronto
> >> 647.724.5232 x 2073
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Ryan Daum
rdaum@informiam.com
Senior Developer, Toronto
647.724.5232 x 2073
Re: Other scms...
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
et tested of course ;)
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
> They need to be updated with latest code of maven-scm-api.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Ryan Daum a écrit :
>> What is the procedure for graduating from sandbox?
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>> On 4/4/07, *Mike Perham* <mperham@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Ah, right. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/scm/
>> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/scm/>
>>
>> But until it graduates from the sandbox, it's not integrated into the
>> release plugin, etc and so isn't terribly useful to the community at
>> large. That's what I meant by "it doesn't exist", i.e. most people
>> can't use it.
>>
>> mike
>>
>> On 4/3/07, Ryan Daum <rdaum@informiam.com
>> <ma...@informiam.com>> wrote:
>> > I know there are more SCM providers than what's on the trunk
>> there -- what
>> > happened to the Mercurial provider (maven-scm-provider-hg) which
>> I submitted
>> > patches to months ago and I was told was transferred to the SVN
>> sandbox
>> > repository? See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-230 ...
>> >
>> > Is there a document on the process involved in getting an SCM
>> provider out
>> > into official distribution? From my experience, commenting and
>> submitting
>> > patches via JIRA doesn't seem to do it, as this work was
>> submitted many
>> > months ago and seems to have been ignored :-)
>> >
>> > Ryan
>> >
>> >
>> > On 4/3/07, Mike Perham < mperham@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > > I'm not aware of any. If it's not here, it doesn't exist.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 4/3/07, Tim Reilly <tim.reilly@consultant.com
>> <ma...@consultant.com>> wrote:
>> > > > Can anyone tell me what the state of PVCS integration is.
>> > > > I recall some discussions a while ago that a provider for
>> PVCS was in
>> > the
>> > > > works?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ryan Daum
>> > rdaum@informiam.com <ma...@informiam.com>
>> > Senior Developer, Toronto
>> > 647.724.5232 x 2073
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ryan Daum
>> rdaum@informiam.com <ma...@informiam.com>
>> Senior Developer, Toronto
>> 647.724.5232 x 2073
>
>
>
>
Re: Other scms...
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
They need to be updated with latest code of maven-scm-api.
Emmanuel
Ryan Daum a écrit :
> What is the procedure for graduating from sandbox?
>
> Ryan
>
> On 4/4/07, *Mike Perham* <mperham@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Ah, right. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/scm/
> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/scm/>
>
> But until it graduates from the sandbox, it's not integrated into the
> release plugin, etc and so isn't terribly useful to the community at
> large. That's what I meant by "it doesn't exist", i.e. most people
> can't use it.
>
> mike
>
> On 4/3/07, Ryan Daum <rdaum@informiam.com
> <ma...@informiam.com>> wrote:
> > I know there are more SCM providers than what's on the trunk
> there -- what
> > happened to the Mercurial provider (maven-scm-provider-hg) which
> I submitted
> > patches to months ago and I was told was transferred to the SVN
> sandbox
> > repository? See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-230 ...
> >
> > Is there a document on the process involved in getting an SCM
> provider out
> > into official distribution? From my experience, commenting and
> submitting
> > patches via JIRA doesn't seem to do it, as this work was
> submitted many
> > months ago and seems to have been ignored :-)
> >
> > Ryan
> >
> >
> > On 4/3/07, Mike Perham < mperham@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > I'm not aware of any. If it's not here, it doesn't exist.
> > >
> > >
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/3/07, Tim Reilly <tim.reilly@consultant.com
> <ma...@consultant.com>> wrote:
> > > > Can anyone tell me what the state of PVCS integration is.
> > > > I recall some discussions a while ago that a provider for
> PVCS was in
> > the
> > > > works?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ryan Daum
> > rdaum@informiam.com <ma...@informiam.com>
> > Senior Developer, Toronto
> > 647.724.5232 x 2073
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ryan Daum
> rdaum@informiam.com <ma...@informiam.com>
> Senior Developer, Toronto
> 647.724.5232 x 2073
Re: Other scms...
Posted by Ryan Daum <rd...@informiam.com>.
What is the procedure for graduating from sandbox?
Ryan
On 4/4/07, Mike Perham <mp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ah, right. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/scm/
>
> But until it graduates from the sandbox, it's not integrated into the
> release plugin, etc and so isn't terribly useful to the community at
> large. That's what I meant by "it doesn't exist", i.e. most people
> can't use it.
>
> mike
>
> On 4/3/07, Ryan Daum <rd...@informiam.com> wrote:
> > I know there are more SCM providers than what's on the trunk there --
> what
> > happened to the Mercurial provider (maven-scm-provider-hg) which I
> submitted
> > patches to months ago and I was told was transferred to the SVN sandbox
> > repository? See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-230 ...
> >
> > Is there a document on the process involved in getting an SCM provider
> out
> > into official distribution? From my experience, commenting and
> submitting
> > patches via JIRA doesn't seem to do it, as this work was submitted many
> > months ago and seems to have been ignored :-)
> >
> > Ryan
> >
> >
> > On 4/3/07, Mike Perham <mp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I'm not aware of any. If it's not here, it doesn't exist.
> > >
> > >
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/3/07, Tim Reilly <ti...@consultant.com> wrote:
> > > > Can anyone tell me what the state of PVCS integration is.
> > > > I recall some discussions a while ago that a provider for PVCS was
> in
> > the
> > > > works?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ryan Daum
> > rdaum@informiam.com
> > Senior Developer, Toronto
> > 647.724.5232 x 2073
>
--
Ryan Daum
rdaum@informiam.com
Senior Developer, Toronto
647.724.5232 x 2073
Re: Other scms...
Posted by Mike Perham <mp...@gmail.com>.
Ah, right. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/scm/
But until it graduates from the sandbox, it's not integrated into the
release plugin, etc and so isn't terribly useful to the community at
large. That's what I meant by "it doesn't exist", i.e. most people
can't use it.
mike
On 4/3/07, Ryan Daum <rd...@informiam.com> wrote:
> I know there are more SCM providers than what's on the trunk there -- what
> happened to the Mercurial provider (maven-scm-provider-hg) which I submitted
> patches to months ago and I was told was transferred to the SVN sandbox
> repository? See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-230 ...
>
> Is there a document on the process involved in getting an SCM provider out
> into official distribution? From my experience, commenting and submitting
> patches via JIRA doesn't seem to do it, as this work was submitted many
> months ago and seems to have been ignored :-)
>
> Ryan
>
>
> On 4/3/07, Mike Perham <mp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm not aware of any. If it's not here, it doesn't exist.
> >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/
> >
> >
> > On 4/3/07, Tim Reilly <ti...@consultant.com> wrote:
> > > Can anyone tell me what the state of PVCS integration is.
> > > I recall some discussions a while ago that a provider for PVCS was in
> the
> > > works?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ryan Daum
> rdaum@informiam.com
> Senior Developer, Toronto
> 647.724.5232 x 2073