You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Phil Steitz (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/02/04 05:49:08 UTC
[jira] Commented: (MATH-187) MatrixUtils - are these supposed to
have a public or package scope constructor?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12565268#action_12565268 ]
Phil Steitz commented on MATH-187:
----------------------------------
The comment is wrong. The constructor is public and needs to stay that way, though at this point we could deprecate it.
> MatrixUtils - are these supposed to have a public or package scope constructor?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MATH-187
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-187
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Sebb
> Priority: Minor
>
> Package or public?
> {code}
> /**
> * Default constructor. Package scope to prevent unwanted instantiation.
> */
> public MatrixUtils() {
> super();
> }
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.