You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@fineract.apache.org by "Michael Vorburger (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/10/01 18:38:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (FINERACT-762) Use of (unmaintained) Drizzle JDBC driver in Fineract at run-time (not build) is sub-optimal for performance

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Michael Vorburger updated FINERACT-762:
---------------------------------------
    Labels: scalability technical  (was: performance technical)

> Use of (unmaintained) Drizzle JDBC driver in Fineract at run-time (not build) is sub-optimal for performance
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FINERACT-762
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-762
>             Project: Apache Fineract
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael Vorburger
>            Assignee: Michael Vorburger
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: scalability, technical
>             Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Creating this issue to clarify that while FINERACT-761 is focused on (only) the build time use of the Drizzle JDBC driver (which does not lead to it being included in the final Fineract end-user distribution), this is re. the use of it at run-time, which is packaged in the distribution.
> The two uses are technically unrelated. While the use of Drizzle instead of Connector/J in the build is a a blocking issue, the use at run-time is not a blocking problem, currently. It's perhaps still not ideal to maintain on a completely unmaintained library (Drizzle) for database access, e.g. for performance.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)