You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to photark-dev@incubator.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2009/11/10 06:35:58 UTC
PhotArk Road Map
I have started logging some JIRAs to create a road map [1] for the
next PhotArk releases.
Please let me know what do you think, and if you have any other
features you would like us to consider.
[1] http://bit.ly/3yPHJs
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: PhotArk Road Map
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW, here is the INFRA Jira : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2343
>
And the wiki is live at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PHOTARK/
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: PhotArk Road Map
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Angela Cymbalak <a....@nechtan.org> wrote:
>> I like the wiki idea, it seems easier to maintain. Is there documentation
>> available on how to get set up with one? Do we need to talk to the
>> infrastructure folks?
>
> Either Luciano or I can set up a wiki space on Confluence, I believe.
>
> One thing that we should think about is that, if we go with a
> Confluence wiki space, we have the option of driving the PhotArk web
> site from that too. Right now, our site is based on Anakia, which,
> while easy to use, is still not quite as easy as editing a wiki. If we
> choose to drive the site from the wiki, the site would be
> auto-generated from the wiki pages.
>
> At the risk of confusing people, there are actually two public-facing
> sites that we can choose to have:
>
> * The web site. (Required.) This is the "official" site, and
> documentation here can be bundled with a release, if we choose to do
> that. This site could be Anakia-based, as it is today, or
> Confluence-based. It is editable only by committers or (if Confluence)
> those who have a signed iCLA on file.
>
+1 to have confluence based website and retiring the Anakia-based website
> * A public wiki. (Optional.) This can be made editable by anyone, if
> we choose, but its contents cannot be bundled with a release, because
> that would require signed iCLAs from all contributors.
>
+1 for delaying this for now, I don't believe we need a wiki as of now yet.
> At this stage, my recommendation would be to go with a web site based
> on Confluence, and no public wiki. My reasoning is that (a) using
> Confluence for the site makes it very easy to update for all PhotArk
> committers and any contributor who is willing to file an iCLA, and (b)
> having a wiki as well as a web site will lead to the little
> documentation we have being split across two locations, which I think
> would hurt our nascent community.
>
> However, that's just my opinion, and it's not up to me, so please,
> everyone, let us know what you think. Luciano, especially - I am not
> trying to nuke the work you have done to set up the Anakia site!
>
Don't get me wrong :) I don't like the Anakia-based websites, it was
just the simplest way to get something going quickly for PhotArk when
we were setting up the podling.
As for going ahead, I think we need to create the INFRA JIRA
requesting the Confluence wiki space, and then work on setting it up.
Martin, if you have created spaces on the Apache infra before, I'd
appreciate your help on executing this, as I haven't create a space
here yet, and I'm not sure if there is any specific
tweaks/configurations that need to be done... but otherwise I can also
help.
BTW, here is the INFRA Jira : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2343
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: PhotArk Road Map
Posted by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Angela Cymbalak <a....@nechtan.org> wrote:
> I like the wiki idea, it seems easier to maintain. Is there documentation
> available on how to get set up with one? Do we need to talk to the
> infrastructure folks?
Either Luciano or I can set up a wiki space on Confluence, I believe.
One thing that we should think about is that, if we go with a
Confluence wiki space, we have the option of driving the PhotArk web
site from that too. Right now, our site is based on Anakia, which,
while easy to use, is still not quite as easy as editing a wiki. If we
choose to drive the site from the wiki, the site would be
auto-generated from the wiki pages.
At the risk of confusing people, there are actually two public-facing
sites that we can choose to have:
* The web site. (Required.) This is the "official" site, and
documentation here can be bundled with a release, if we choose to do
that. This site could be Anakia-based, as it is today, or
Confluence-based. It is editable only by committers or (if Confluence)
those who have a signed iCLA on file.
* A public wiki. (Optional.) This can be made editable by anyone, if
we choose, but its contents cannot be bundled with a release, because
that would require signed iCLAs from all contributors.
At this stage, my recommendation would be to go with a web site based
on Confluence, and no public wiki. My reasoning is that (a) using
Confluence for the site makes it very easy to update for all PhotArk
committers and any contributor who is willing to file an iCLA, and (b)
having a wiki as well as a web site will lead to the little
documentation we have being split across two locations, which I think
would hurt our nascent community.
However, that's just my opinion, and it's not up to me, so please,
everyone, let us know what you think. Luciano, especially - I am not
trying to nuke the work you have done to set up the Anakia site!
--
Martin Cooper
> Angie
>
> At 01:15 AM 11/21/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Angela Cymbalak <a....@nechtan.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Luciano,
>> >
>> > I have several pieces of documentation and the logo that I did. Where
>> > should they be uploaded to?
>> >
>> > Angie
>> >
>>
>> Either to the website, or maybe we should create a wiki ?
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
Re: PhotArk Road Map
Posted by Angela Cymbalak <a....@nechtan.org>.
I like the wiki idea, it seems easier to maintain. Is there
documentation available on how to get set up with one? Do we need to
talk to the infrastructure folks?
Angie
At 01:15 AM 11/21/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Angela Cymbalak
><a....@nechtan.org> wrote:
> > Luciano,
> >
> > I have several pieces of documentation and the logo that I did. Where
> > should they be uploaded to?
> >
> > Angie
> >
>
>Either to the website, or maybe we should create a wiki ?
>
>--
>Luciano Resende
>http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: PhotArk Road Map
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Angela Cymbalak <a....@nechtan.org> wrote:
> Luciano,
>
> I have several pieces of documentation and the logo that I did. Where
> should they be uploaded to?
>
> Angie
>
Either to the website, or maybe we should create a wiki ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: PhotArk Road Map
Posted by Angela Cymbalak <a....@nechtan.org>.
Luciano,
I have several pieces of documentation and the logo that I
did. Where should they be uploaded to?
Angie
At 01:35 AM 11/10/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>I have started logging some JIRAs to create a road map [1] for the
>next PhotArk releases.
>
>Please let me know what do you think, and if you have any other
>features you would like us to consider.
>
>[1] http://bit.ly/3yPHJs
>
>--
>Luciano Resende
>http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>http://lresende.blogspot.com/