You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Maurizio Cucchiara (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/12/01 11:45:36 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (LANG-871) [XSS] Possible attacks through
StringEscapeUtils.escapeEcmaScript?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13835998#comment-13835998 ]
Maurizio Cucchiara commented on LANG-871:
-----------------------------------------
[~bayard],
thought I agree with you, the truth is that there are many framework/application which rely on escape* methods in terms of security.
[~aree] An input example would be appreciated.
> [XSS] Possible attacks through StringEscapeUtils.escapeEcmaScript?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-871
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-871
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: lang.*
> Affects Versions: 3.1
> Reporter: Andy Reek
> Labels: XSS
> Fix For: Discussion
>
>
> org.apache.commons.lang3.StringEscapeUtils.escapeEcmaScript does the escape via a prefixed '\' on all characters which must be escaped. I am not sure if this is really secure, if am looking at the comments on https://www.owasp.org/index.php/XSS_(Cross_Site_Scripting)_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet#RULE_.233_-_JavaScript_Escape_Before_Inserting_Untrusted_Data_into_JavaScript_Data_Values. They say it is possible to do an attack by escape the escape. I tested this with the string '\"' and the output was '\\\"'. Is this really ecma-/java-script secure? Or is it better to use the the implementation used by OWASP?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)