You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by gaugat <go...@augat.org> on 2008/05/01 22:35:36 UTC
Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5
I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5 (JSR 286) to
develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets using
Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a sample
wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there still issues
with Wicket and Liferay?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p16995052.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5
Posted by Bobby Quinne <el...@gmail.com>.
Thank you very much for the prompt responses Thijs.
Will have to consider another framework for portlet development,
at least until wicket-crew wrap up integration.
Keep up the brilliant work!
Thijs wrote:
>
> Bobby Quninne schreef:
>> Are JSR-168 portlets also affected by this?
>>
> Not sure what you are asking. The current JSR-168 implementation in
> wicket is pretty much final, and for wicket 1.3.x will probably not
> change. However newer versions of wicket probably will not be backwards
> compatible, with JSR 168, but I don't know for sure...
>> If so, is there a version of wicket and liferay that are compatible?
>>
> As described below. An out of the box wicket version will NOT work on
> any version of Liferay. So there is no Wicket version that is compatible.
> If you are willing to work with a patched version of wicket, then you
> can work with wicket 1.3.3 and LF5(as we are)
>
>
> Thijs
>> Many thanks Thijs :-)
>>
>>
>> Thijs wrote:
>>
>>> No, as described it depends on several factors
>>> 1. my/other people's time to commit to this
>>> 2. official release of the portlet 2 specifications
>>>
>>> Thijs
>>>
>>> Bobby Quninne schreef:
>>>
>>>> You have a rough guess estimate as to a wicket release that will
>>>> address
>>>> JSR-268 compliance?
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thijs wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using
>>>>> com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of
>>>>> javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without
>>>>> losing most of wickets functionality.
>>>>> I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get
>>>>> wicket
>>>>> working on liferay 5, but we are still modifying wicket and Liferay
>>>>> code
>>>>> to get things working as we want it. So I can't guaranty anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thijs
>>>>>
>>>>> Bobby Quninne wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi there, I am currently considering using wicket 1.3.3(and newer)
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> liferay 5.
>>>>>> The site is going to be used for backend administration, standard
>>>>>> CRUD
>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>> How big a risk is it, using wicket portal and liferay?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thijs wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However
>>>>>>> while
>>>>>>> doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues
>>>>>>> regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the
>>>>>>> response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> still some work to be done. They also don't support the
>>>>>>> MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT feaure jet, what would be a really nice
>>>>>>> addition because of the CSS and JS files wicket adds to it's pages.
>>>>>>> Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and
>>>>>>> track it to follow the property changes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can
>>>>>>> track
>>>>>>> the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to wait
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> maven repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base.
>>>>>>> Besides that it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours
>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>> don't get over excited just jet :).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll
>>>>>>> attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the
>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>> I've been doing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I hope that answers your questions a bit.
>>>>>>> Thijs
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gaugat wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5
>>>>>>>> (JSR
>>>>>>>> 286) to
>>>>>>>> develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets
>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>> Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a
>>>>>>>> sample
>>>>>>>> wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there
>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>> with Wicket and Liferay?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p17078837.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5
Posted by Thijs <vo...@gmail.com>.
Bobby Quninne schreef:
> Are JSR-168 portlets also affected by this?
>
Not sure what you are asking. The current JSR-168 implementation in
wicket is pretty much final, and for wicket 1.3.x will probably not
change. However newer versions of wicket probably will not be backwards
compatible, with JSR 168, but I don't know for sure...
> If so, is there a version of wicket and liferay that are compatible?
>
As described below. An out of the box wicket version will NOT work on
any version of Liferay. So there is no Wicket version that is compatible.
If you are willing to work with a patched version of wicket, then you
can work with wicket 1.3.3 and LF5(as we are)
Thijs
> Many thanks Thijs :-)
>
>
> Thijs wrote:
>
>> No, as described it depends on several factors
>> 1. my/other people's time to commit to this
>> 2. official release of the portlet 2 specifications
>>
>> Thijs
>>
>> Bobby Quninne schreef:
>>
>>> You have a rough guess estimate as to a wicket release that will address
>>> JSR-268 compliance?
>>>
>>> Many thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Thijs wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using
>>>> com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of
>>>> javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without
>>>> losing most of wickets functionality.
>>>> I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get wicket
>>>> working on liferay 5, but we are still modifying wicket and Liferay code
>>>> to get things working as we want it. So I can't guaranty anything.
>>>>
>>>> Thijs
>>>>
>>>> Bobby Quninne wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi there, I am currently considering using wicket 1.3.3(and newer) with
>>>>> liferay 5.
>>>>> The site is going to be used for backend administration, standard CRUD
>>>>> stuff.
>>>>> How big a risk is it, using wicket portal and liferay?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thijs wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However
>>>>>> while
>>>>>> doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues
>>>>>> regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the
>>>>>> response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> still some work to be done. They also don't support the
>>>>>> MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT feaure jet, what would be a really nice
>>>>>> addition because of the CSS and JS files wicket adds to it's pages.
>>>>>> Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and
>>>>>> track it to follow the property changes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can
>>>>>> track
>>>>>> the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to wait at
>>>>>> least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to a
>>>>>> maven repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base.
>>>>>> Besides that it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours so
>>>>>> don't get over excited just jet :).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll
>>>>>> attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the
>>>>>> work
>>>>>> I've been doing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope that answers your questions a bit.
>>>>>> Thijs
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gaugat wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5 (JSR
>>>>>>> 286) to
>>>>>>> develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets
>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>> Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a
>>>>>>> sample
>>>>>>> wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there still
>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>> with Wicket and Liferay?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5
Posted by Bobby Quninne <el...@gmail.com>.
Are JSR-168 portlets also affected by this?
If so, is there a version of wicket and liferay that are compatible?
Many thanks Thijs :-)
Thijs wrote:
>
> No, as described it depends on several factors
> 1. my/other people's time to commit to this
> 2. official release of the portlet 2 specifications
>
> Thijs
>
> Bobby Quninne schreef:
>> You have a rough guess estimate as to a wicket release that will address
>> JSR-268 compliance?
>>
>> Many thanks
>>
>>
>> Thijs wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using
>>> com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of
>>> javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without
>>> losing most of wickets functionality.
>>> I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get wicket
>>> working on liferay 5, but we are still modifying wicket and Liferay code
>>> to get things working as we want it. So I can't guaranty anything.
>>>
>>> Thijs
>>>
>>> Bobby Quninne wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi there, I am currently considering using wicket 1.3.3(and newer) with
>>>> liferay 5.
>>>> The site is going to be used for backend administration, standard CRUD
>>>> stuff.
>>>> How big a risk is it, using wicket portal and liferay?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thijs wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However
>>>>> while
>>>>> doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues
>>>>> regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the
>>>>> response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there
>>>>> is
>>>>> still some work to be done. They also don't support the
>>>>> MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT feaure jet, what would be a really nice
>>>>> addition because of the CSS and JS files wicket adds to it's pages.
>>>>> Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and
>>>>> track it to follow the property changes
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can
>>>>> track
>>>>> the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to wait at
>>>>> least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to a
>>>>> maven repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base.
>>>>> Besides that it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours so
>>>>> don't get over excited just jet :).
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll
>>>>> attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the
>>>>> work
>>>>> I've been doing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope that answers your questions a bit.
>>>>> Thijs
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> gaugat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5 (JSR
>>>>>> 286) to
>>>>>> develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets
>>>>>> using
>>>>>> Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a
>>>>>> sample
>>>>>> wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there still
>>>>>> issues
>>>>>> with Wicket and Liferay?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p17078122.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5
Posted by Thijs <vo...@gmail.com>.
No, as described it depends on several factors
1. my/other people's time to commit to this
2. official release of the portlet 2 specifications
Thijs
Bobby Quninne schreef:
> You have a rough guess estimate as to a wicket release that will address
> JSR-268 compliance?
>
> Many thanks
>
>
> Thijs wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using
>> com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of
>> javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without
>> losing most of wickets functionality.
>> I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get wicket
>> working on liferay 5, but we are still modifying wicket and Liferay code
>> to get things working as we want it. So I can't guaranty anything.
>>
>> Thijs
>>
>> Bobby Quninne wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there, I am currently considering using wicket 1.3.3(and newer) with
>>> liferay 5.
>>> The site is going to be used for backend administration, standard CRUD
>>> stuff.
>>> How big a risk is it, using wicket portal and liferay?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Thijs wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However while
>>>> doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues
>>>> regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the
>>>> response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there is
>>>> still some work to be done. They also don't support the
>>>> MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT feaure jet, what would be a really nice
>>>> addition because of the CSS and JS files wicket adds to it's pages.
>>>> Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and
>>>> track it to follow the property changes
>>>>
>>>> I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can track
>>>> the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to wait at
>>>> least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to a
>>>> maven repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base.
>>>> Besides that it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours so
>>>> don't get over excited just jet :).
>>>>
>>>> I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll
>>>> attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the work
>>>> I've been doing.
>>>>
>>>> I hope that answers your questions a bit.
>>>> Thijs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> gaugat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5 (JSR
>>>>> 286) to
>>>>> develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets
>>>>> using
>>>>> Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a sample
>>>>> wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there still
>>>>> issues
>>>>> with Wicket and Liferay?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5
Posted by Bobby Quninne <el...@gmail.com>.
You have a rough guess estimate as to a wicket release that will address
JSR-268 compliance?
Many thanks
Thijs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using
> com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of
> javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without
> losing most of wickets functionality.
> I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get wicket
> working on liferay 5, but we are still modifying wicket and Liferay code
> to get things working as we want it. So I can't guaranty anything.
>
> Thijs
>
> Bobby Quninne wrote:
>> Hi there, I am currently considering using wicket 1.3.3(and newer) with
>> liferay 5.
>> The site is going to be used for backend administration, standard CRUD
>> stuff.
>> How big a risk is it, using wicket portal and liferay?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> Thijs wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However while
>>> doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues
>>> regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the
>>> response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there is
>>> still some work to be done. They also don't support the
>>> MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT feaure jet, what would be a really nice
>>> addition because of the CSS and JS files wicket adds to it's pages.
>>> Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and
>>> track it to follow the property changes
>>>
>>> I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can track
>>> the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to wait at
>>> least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to a
>>> maven repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base.
>>> Besides that it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours so
>>> don't get over excited just jet :).
>>>
>>> I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll
>>> attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the work
>>> I've been doing.
>>>
>>> I hope that answers your questions a bit.
>>> Thijs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> gaugat wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5 (JSR
>>>> 286) to
>>>> develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets
>>>> using
>>>> Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a sample
>>>> wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there still
>>>> issues
>>>> with Wicket and Liferay?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p17077583.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5
Posted by Benjamin Ernst <be...@gmail.com>.
Hi Thijs,
thanks for your help, but you don't have to hurry. We faked the whole thing
by running our Wicket-App inside an iFrame in Liferay. It is just for a
showcase.
So we don't need it right now.
Thanks anyway,
Benjamin
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Thijs Vonk <vo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Benjamin
> I'll see if I have some time left tomorrow, otherwise hopefully before next
> tuesday.
>
> Thijs
>
>
> Benjamin Ernst wrote:
>
>> Hi Thijs,
>>
>> We are currently trying to integrate Liferay 5 with wicket 1.3. Can you
>> give
>> us the advise you offered? That would be very nice.
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>> Benjamin
>>
>> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Thijs Vonk <vo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using
>>> com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of
>>> javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without
>>> losing most of wickets functionality.
>>> I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get wicket
>>> working on liferay 5, but we are still modifying wicket and Liferay code
>>> to
>>> get things working as we want it. So I can't guaranty anything.
>>>
>>> Thijs
>>>
>>>
>>> Bobby Quninne wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi there, I am currently considering using wicket 1.3.3(and newer) with
>>>> liferay 5. The site is going to be used for backend administration,
>>>> standard CRUD
>>>> stuff. How big a risk is it, using wicket portal and liferay?
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thijs wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However
>>>>> while doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues
>>>>> regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the
>>>>> response
>>>>> (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there is still
>>>>> some
>>>>> work to be done. They also don't support the
>>>>> MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT
>>>>> feaure jet, what would be a really nice addition because of the CSS and
>>>>> JS
>>>>> files wicket adds to it's pages.
>>>>> Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and
>>>>> track it to follow the property changes
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can
>>>>> track the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to
>>>>> wait at
>>>>> least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to a
>>>>> maven
>>>>> repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base. Besides
>>>>> that
>>>>> it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours so don't get
>>>>> over
>>>>> excited just jet :).
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll
>>>>> attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the work
>>>>> I've
>>>>> been doing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope that answers your questions a bit.
>>>>> Thijs
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> gaugat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5
>>>>>> (JSR
>>>>>> 286) to
>>>>>> develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets
>>>>>> using
>>>>>> Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a
>>>>>> sample
>>>>>> wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there
>>>>>> still
>>>>>> issues
>>>>>> with Wicket and Liferay?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5
Posted by Thijs Vonk <vo...@gmail.com>.
Hi Benjamin
I'll see if I have some time left tomorrow, otherwise hopefully before
next tuesday.
Thijs
Benjamin Ernst wrote:
> Hi Thijs,
>
> We are currently trying to integrate Liferay 5 with wicket 1.3. Can you give
> us the advise you offered? That would be very nice.
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Benjamin
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Thijs Vonk <vo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using
>> com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of
>> javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without
>> losing most of wickets functionality.
>> I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get wicket
>> working on liferay 5, but we are still modifying wicket and Liferay code to
>> get things working as we want it. So I can't guaranty anything.
>>
>> Thijs
>>
>>
>> Bobby Quninne wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi there, I am currently considering using wicket 1.3.3(and newer) with
>>> liferay 5. The site is going to be used for backend administration,
>>> standard CRUD
>>> stuff. How big a risk is it, using wicket portal and liferay?
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Thijs wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However
>>>> while doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues
>>>> regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the response
>>>> (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there is still some
>>>> work to be done. They also don't support the MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT
>>>> feaure jet, what would be a really nice addition because of the CSS and JS
>>>> files wicket adds to it's pages.
>>>> Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and
>>>> track it to follow the property changes
>>>>
>>>> I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can
>>>> track the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to wait at
>>>> least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to a maven
>>>> repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base. Besides that
>>>> it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours so don't get over
>>>> excited just jet :).
>>>>
>>>> I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll
>>>> attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the work I've
>>>> been doing.
>>>>
>>>> I hope that answers your questions a bit.
>>>> Thijs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> gaugat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5
>>>>> (JSR
>>>>> 286) to
>>>>> develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets
>>>>> using
>>>>> Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a
>>>>> sample
>>>>> wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there
>>>>> still
>>>>> issues
>>>>> with Wicket and Liferay?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5
Posted by Benjamin Ernst <be...@gmail.com>.
Hi Thijs,
We are currently trying to integrate Liferay 5 with wicket 1.3. Can you give
us the advise you offered? That would be very nice.
Thank you in advance,
Benjamin
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Thijs Vonk <vo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using
> com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of
> javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without
> losing most of wickets functionality.
> I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get wicket
> working on liferay 5, but we are still modifying wicket and Liferay code to
> get things working as we want it. So I can't guaranty anything.
>
> Thijs
>
>
> Bobby Quninne wrote:
>
> > Hi there, I am currently considering using wicket 1.3.3(and newer) with
> > liferay 5. The site is going to be used for backend administration,
> > standard CRUD
> > stuff. How big a risk is it, using wicket portal and liferay?
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Thijs wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However
> > > while doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues
> > > regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the response
> > > (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there is still some
> > > work to be done. They also don't support the MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT
> > > feaure jet, what would be a really nice addition because of the CSS and JS
> > > files wicket adds to it's pages.
> > > Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and
> > > track it to follow the property changes
> > >
> > > I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can
> > > track the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to wait at
> > > least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to a maven
> > > repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base. Besides that
> > > it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours so don't get over
> > > excited just jet :).
> > >
> > > I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll
> > > attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the work I've
> > > been doing.
> > >
> > > I hope that answers your questions a bit.
> > > Thijs
> > >
> > >
> > > gaugat wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5
> > > > (JSR
> > > > 286) to
> > > > develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets
> > > > using
> > > > Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a
> > > > sample
> > > > wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there
> > > > still
> > > > issues
> > > > with Wicket and Liferay?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5
Posted by Thijs Vonk <vo...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Currently without building wicket against Liferay (using
com.liferay.portlet.renderresponseimpl, instead of
javax.portlet.renderresponse) it is not possible to run wicket without
losing most of wickets functionality.
I can, if you want, give you a patch and some instructions to get wicket
working on liferay 5, but we are still modifying wicket and Liferay code
to get things working as we want it. So I can't guaranty anything.
Thijs
Bobby Quninne wrote:
> Hi there, I am currently considering using wicket 1.3.3(and newer) with
> liferay 5.
> The site is going to be used for backend administration, standard CRUD
> stuff.
> How big a risk is it, using wicket portal and liferay?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Thijs wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However while
>> doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues
>> regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the
>> response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there is
>> still some work to be done. They also don't support the
>> MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT feaure jet, what would be a really nice
>> addition because of the CSS and JS files wicket adds to it's pages.
>> Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and
>> track it to follow the property changes
>>
>> I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can track
>> the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to wait at
>> least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to a
>> maven repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base.
>> Besides that it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours so
>> don't get over excited just jet :).
>>
>> I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll
>> attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the work
>> I've been doing.
>>
>> I hope that answers your questions a bit.
>> Thijs
>>
>>
>>
>> gaugat wrote:
>>
>>> I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5 (JSR
>>> 286) to
>>> develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets using
>>> Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a sample
>>> wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there still
>>> issues
>>> with Wicket and Liferay?
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5
Posted by Bobby Quninne <el...@gmail.com>.
Hi there, I am currently considering using wicket 1.3.3(and newer) with
liferay 5.
The site is going to be used for backend administration, standard CRUD
stuff.
How big a risk is it, using wicket portal and liferay?
Thanks
Thijs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However while
> doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues
> regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the
> response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there is
> still some work to be done. They also don't support the
> MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT feaure jet, what would be a really nice
> addition because of the CSS and JS files wicket adds to it's pages.
> Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and
> track it to follow the property changes
>
> I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can track
> the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to wait at
> least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to a
> maven repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base.
> Besides that it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours so
> don't get over excited just jet :).
>
> I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll
> attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the work
> I've been doing.
>
> I hope that answers your questions a bit.
> Thijs
>
>
>
> gaugat wrote:
>> I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5 (JSR
>> 286) to
>> develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets using
>> Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a sample
>> wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there still
>> issues
>> with Wicket and Liferay?
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Portlets-in-Liferay-5-tp16995052p17061496.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket Portlets in Liferay 5
Posted by Thijs Vonk <vo...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I'm working on getting wicket compatible with jsr-286 now. However while
doing this I've noticed that Liferay has still some major issues
regarding jsr-286. Especially regarding setting properties on the
response (essentially setting response headers, cookies, etc) there is
still some work to be done. They also don't support the
MARKUP_HEAD_ELEMENT_SUPPORT feaure jet, what would be a really nice
addition because of the CSS and JS files wicket adds to it's pages.
Comment and vote on http://support.liferay.com/browse/LEP-5828. and
track it to follow the property changes
I'm also planning on opening a Wicket-jira issue so that you can track
the progress of the wicket implementation. But we will have to wait at
least until the portlet 2.0 specifications get official and added to a
maven repository before we can add anything to the wicket code base.
Besides that it's a lot of work and I'm doing this in my free hours so
don't get over excited just jet :).
I'll post a message on the list when I open the jira issue, and I'll
attach patches to that issue as soon as I feel confident about the work
I've been doing.
I hope that answers your questions a bit.
Thijs
gaugat wrote:
> I've read in the forums, that it is better to wait for Liferay 5 (JSR 286) to
> develop portlets in Apache Wicket. So has anyone developed portlets using
> Wicket and deployed them in Liferay 5?. If you have, is there a sample
> wicket portlet posted somewhere that I could look at? Are there still issues
> with Wicket and Liferay?
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org