You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jena.apache.org by "Dr. Chavdar Ivanov" <ch...@outlook.de> on 2020/06/24 09:26:45 UTC
Jena ARQ
Hi all,
Is there some change in the packaging of commons?
In the BlankNodeAllocatorHash.java the line below gives a problem if version 3.15.0 is used and it is ok if 3.14.0 is used
import org.apache.commons.codec.digest.MurmurHash3;
It cannot recognise the codec
Is it an issue with 3.15.0 or something else?
Best regards
Chavdar
RE: Jena ARQ
Posted by "Dr. Chavdar Ivanov" <ch...@outlook.de>.
Hello,This is what I did - put explicit reference to Apache Commons Codec 1.14 In POM and all workedBest regardsChavdar-----Original Message-----From: Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> Sent: Thursday, 25 June, 2020 09:31To: users@jena.apache.orgSubject: Re: Jena ARQOn 24/06/2020 22:49, Martynas Jusevièius wrote:> I had this problem with 3.15.0. Upgraded to 3.16.0-SNAPSHOT and the > problem went away.> > I think the issue is that Apache Commons Codec 1.14 contains the> MurmurHash3 class while for example 1.11 does not. You probably got an > older Codec version on the classpath which then gets used by Jena.Commons Codec also gets pulled (1.11) from Apache HttpComponents. Due to the wonders of maven dependency management, it sometimes came from HttpComponents and sometimes via jena-arq. It seems they have the same choice weight and there is an element of luck as to which is picked, probably affected by order in the application POM.https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1898or put an explicit dependency into you own POM.I expect gradle would not have the problem. It seems to be maven's "nearest first" combined with an artifact with two versions being the same distance away. Andy> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 2:37 PM Dr. Chavdar Ivanov <ch...@outlook.de> wrote:>>>> Hi Lorenz,>>>> Thanks for the reference. I see that indeed this came in 3.15 I use >> Maven and as you say it should be ok if the 3.15.0 is ok.>> I will check the dependencies to be sure all is ok there.>>>> Best regards>> Chavdar>>>> -----Original Message----->> From: Lorenz Buehmann <bu...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>>> Sent: Wednesday, 24 June, 2020 12:02>> To: users@jena.apache.org>> Subject: Re: Jena ARQ>>>> Has been changed with JENA-1812 [1]>>>> But I'm wondering where you get errors now? If you use Maven and use>> 3.15.0 as dependencies, you should not see any errors.>>>>>> [1]>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1812?jql=project%20%3D%20J>> ENA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Jena%203.15.0%22%20ORDER%20BY%20key>> %20DESC%2C%20lastViewed%20DESC>>>> On 24.06.20 11:26, Dr. Chavdar Ivanov wrote:>>> Hi all,>>>>>> Is there some change in the packaging of commons?>>>>>> In the BlankNodeAllocatorHash.java the line below gives a problem if >>> version 3.15.0 is used and it is ok if 3.14.0 is used>>>>>> import org.apache.commons.codec.digest.MurmurHash3;>>>>>> It cannot recognise the codec>>>>>> Is it an issue with 3.15.0 or something else?>>>>>> Best regards>>> Chavdar>>>
Re: Jena ARQ
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 24/06/2020 22:49, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
> I had this problem with 3.15.0. Upgraded to 3.16.0-SNAPSHOT and the
> problem went away.
>
> I think the issue is that Apache Commons Codec 1.14 contains the
> MurmurHash3 class while for example 1.11 does not. You probably got an
> older Codec version on the classpath which then gets used by Jena.
Commons Codec also gets pulled (1.11) from Apache HttpComponents. Due to
the wonders of maven dependency management, it sometimes came from
HttpComponents and sometimes via jena-arq. It seems they have the same
choice weight and there is an element of luck as to which is picked,
probably affected by order in the application POM.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1898
or put an explicit dependency into you own POM.
I expect gradle would not have the problem. It seems to be maven's
"nearest first" combined with an artifact with two versions being the
same distance away.
Andy
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 2:37 PM Dr. Chavdar Ivanov <ch...@outlook.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lorenz,
>>
>> Thanks for the reference. I see that indeed this came in 3.15
>> I use Maven and as you say it should be ok if the 3.15.0 is ok.
>> I will check the dependencies to be sure all is ok there.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Chavdar
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lorenz Buehmann <bu...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
>> Sent: Wednesday, 24 June, 2020 12:02
>> To: users@jena.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Jena ARQ
>>
>> Has been changed with JENA-1812 [1]
>>
>> But I'm wondering where you get errors now? If you use Maven and use
>> 3.15.0 as dependencies, you should not see any errors.
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1812?jql=project%20%3D%20JENA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Jena%203.15.0%22%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20lastViewed%20DESC
>>
>> On 24.06.20 11:26, Dr. Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Is there some change in the packaging of commons?
>>>
>>> In the BlankNodeAllocatorHash.java the line below gives a problem if version 3.15.0 is used and it is ok if 3.14.0 is used
>>>
>>> import org.apache.commons.codec.digest.MurmurHash3;
>>>
>>> It cannot recognise the codec
>>>
>>> Is it an issue with 3.15.0 or something else?
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Chavdar
>>>
Re: Jena ARQ
Posted by Martynas Jusevičius <ma...@atomgraph.com>.
I had this problem with 3.15.0. Upgraded to 3.16.0-SNAPSHOT and the
problem went away.
I think the issue is that Apache Commons Codec 1.14 contains the
MurmurHash3 class while for example 1.11 does not. You probably got an
older Codec version on the classpath which then gets used by Jena.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 2:37 PM Dr. Chavdar Ivanov <ch...@outlook.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Lorenz,
>
> Thanks for the reference. I see that indeed this came in 3.15
> I use Maven and as you say it should be ok if the 3.15.0 is ok.
> I will check the dependencies to be sure all is ok there.
>
> Best regards
> Chavdar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lorenz Buehmann <bu...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
> Sent: Wednesday, 24 June, 2020 12:02
> To: users@jena.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Jena ARQ
>
> Has been changed with JENA-1812 [1]
>
> But I'm wondering where you get errors now? If you use Maven and use
> 3.15.0 as dependencies, you should not see any errors.
>
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1812?jql=project%20%3D%20JENA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Jena%203.15.0%22%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20lastViewed%20DESC
>
> On 24.06.20 11:26, Dr. Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is there some change in the packaging of commons?
> >
> > In the BlankNodeAllocatorHash.java the line below gives a problem if version 3.15.0 is used and it is ok if 3.14.0 is used
> >
> > import org.apache.commons.codec.digest.MurmurHash3;
> >
> > It cannot recognise the codec
> >
> > Is it an issue with 3.15.0 or something else?
> >
> > Best regards
> > Chavdar
> >
RE: Jena ARQ
Posted by "Dr. Chavdar Ivanov" <ch...@outlook.de>.
Hi Lorenz,
Thanks for the reference. I see that indeed this came in 3.15
I use Maven and as you say it should be ok if the 3.15.0 is ok.
I will check the dependencies to be sure all is ok there.
Best regards
Chavdar
-----Original Message-----
From: Lorenz Buehmann <bu...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Sent: Wednesday, 24 June, 2020 12:02
To: users@jena.apache.org
Subject: Re: Jena ARQ
Has been changed with JENA-1812 [1]
But I'm wondering where you get errors now? If you use Maven and use
3.15.0 as dependencies, you should not see any errors.
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1812?jql=project%20%3D%20JENA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Jena%203.15.0%22%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20lastViewed%20DESC
On 24.06.20 11:26, Dr. Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there some change in the packaging of commons?
>
> In the BlankNodeAllocatorHash.java the line below gives a problem if version 3.15.0 is used and it is ok if 3.14.0 is used
>
> import org.apache.commons.codec.digest.MurmurHash3;
>
> It cannot recognise the codec
>
> Is it an issue with 3.15.0 or something else?
>
> Best regards
> Chavdar
>
Re: Jena ARQ
Posted by Lorenz Buehmann <bu...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>.
Has been changed with JENA-1812 [1]
But I'm wondering where you get errors now? If you use Maven and use
3.15.0 as dependencies, you should not see any errors.
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1812?jql=project%20%3D%20JENA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Jena%203.15.0%22%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20lastViewed%20DESC
On 24.06.20 11:26, Dr. Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there some change in the packaging of commons?
>
> In the BlankNodeAllocatorHash.java the line below gives a problem if version 3.15.0 is used and it is ok if 3.14.0 is used
>
> import org.apache.commons.codec.digest.MurmurHash3;
>
> It cannot recognise the codec
>
> Is it an issue with 3.15.0 or something else?
>
> Best regards
> Chavdar
>