You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@ant.apache.org by Keith Hatton <kh...@axiomsystems.com> on 2003/02/11 10:41:25 UTC

FW: Spamarrest

I don't know whether this is genuine but as I'm paranoid :) it looks like spam to me.
If it is genuine I don't think it is the right way to deal with spam.
Can the list owners please deal with this guy.
 
Thanks
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: konrad [mailto:konrad=pobox.com@spamarrest.com]
Sent: 11 February 2003 09:37
To: Keith Hatton
Subject: RE: RE: Missing & misleading documentation, help needed on advanced Jar functionality (verification)


This is a spam mail prevention service. 

Just this once, click the link below so I can receive your emails. You won't have to do this again. 

http://spamarrest.com/a?99007402:623510 


 

 

  <http://spamarrest.com/img/emailfooter.gif> 

You are receiving this message in response to your email to konrad, a Spam Arrest customer. 

Spam Arrest requests that senders verify themselves before their email is delivered. 

When you click the above link, you will be taken to a page with a graphic on it. Simply read the word in the graphic, type it into the form, and you're verified. 

You will only need to do this once per Spam Arrest customer. 

Webmasters help stop spam and make 50%.
http://spamarrest.com/affl?253602/affiliates/index.jsp 

------------------------------------------------------------ 

Re: FW: Spamarrest

Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Keith Hatton <kh...@axiomsystems.com> wrote:

> If it is genuine I don't think it is the right way to deal with
> spam.

You are certainly correct.  At least not for people subscribing to
mailing lists.

> Can the list owners please deal with this guy.

They've been asked to already.

Stefan

Re: FW: Spamarrest

Posted by Adam Hardy <ad...@cyberspaceroad.com>.
how ironic. Maybe it IS spam. Did anybody actually follow the instructions?

Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>
> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Did you get something more recently than that
> 
> 
> I did.
> 
> By now I have received enough spam-arrest mails that ifile has been
> trained to detect them as spam themselves 8-)
> 
> Stefan
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org
> 
> 


Re: FW: Spamarrest

Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>
wrote:

> Did you get something more recently than that

I did.

By now I have received enough spam-arrest mails that ifile has been
trained to detect them as spam themselves 8-)

Stefan

Re: FW: Spamarrest

Posted by Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>.
Keith Hatton wrote:
> I don't know whether this is genuine but as I'm paranoid :) it looks like spam to me.
> If it is genuine I don't think it is the right way to deal with spam.
> Can the list owners please deal with this guy.
>  
> Thanks
>  

I requested the user to be unsubscribed about 7 hours ago. I was informed 
about 3 hours later that there was no users subsribed to this list with the 
name in question or anything similar. Did you get something more recently 
than that (I'm about to find out, I think)

I also tried sending email directly to the user but no reply.

I'm about to contact spamarrest directly.

So, still trying to sort it out ....

Conor



Re: FW: Spamarrest

Posted by Tony Obermeit <to...@compuserve.com>.
Is it possible this is just because the ant list was recently changed to a 
different address?

At 09:41 AM 11/02/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>
>I don't know whether this is genuine but as I'm paranoid :) it looks like 
>spam to me.
>If it is genuine I don't think it is the right way to deal with spam.
>Can the list owners please deal with this guy.
>
>Thanks
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: konrad [mailto:konrad=pobox.com@spamarrest.com]
>Sent: 11 February 2003 09:37
>To: Keith Hatton
>Subject: RE: RE: Missing & misleading documentation, help needed on 
>advanced Jar functionality (verification)
>
>
>This is a spam mail prevention service.
>
>Just this once, click the link below so I can receive your emails. You 
>won't have to do this again.
>
>http://spamarrest.com/a?99007402:623510
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   <http://spamarrest.com/img/emailfooter.gif>
>
>You are receiving this message in response to your email to konrad, a Spam 
>Arrest customer.
>
>Spam Arrest requests that senders verify themselves before their email is 
>delivered.
>
>When you click the above link, you will be taken to a page with a graphic 
>on it. Simply read the word in the graphic, type it into the form, and 
>you're verified.
>
>You will only need to do this once per Spam Arrest customer.
>
>Webmasters help stop spam and make 50%.
>http://spamarrest.com/affl?253602/affiliates/index.jsp
>
>------------------------------------------------------------