svn commit: r1044023 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_wc/db-test.c

[ph...@apache.org]

Author: philip
Date: Thu Dec  9 16:28:33 2010
New Revision: 1044023

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1044023&view=rev
Log:
* subversion/tests/libsvn_wc/db-test.c
  (test_scan_deletion): Make one test result conditional on
   SVN_WC__OP_DEPTH, add some comments expressing concern about
   the results.

Modified:
    subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_wc/db-test.c

Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_wc/db-test.c
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_wc/db-test.c?rev=1044023&r1=1044022&r2=1044023&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_wc/db-test.c (original)
+++ subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_wc/db-test.c Thu Dec  9 16:28:33 2010
@@ -1172,12 +1172,22 @@ test_scan_deletion(apr_pool_t *pool)
             &work_del_abspath,
             db, svn_dirent_join(local_abspath, "J/J-e/J-e-b/Jeba", pool),
             pool, pool));
+  /* ### I don't understand this.  "J/J-e/J-e-b/Jeba" is a deleted
+     base node that is not overlayed by the replacement rooted at "J".
+     Why does base_del_abspath refer to "J-e"?  */
   SVN_TEST_ASSERT(validate_abspath(local_abspath, "J/J-e",
                                    base_del_abspath, pool));
   SVN_TEST_ASSERT(validate_abspath(local_abspath, "other/place",
                                    moved_to_abspath, pool));
+#ifndef SVN_WC__OP_DEPTH
+  /* ### I don't understand this.  "J/J-e/J-e-b/Jeba" is a deleted
+     base node that is not overlayed by the replacement rooted at "J".
+     Why is work_del_abspath not NULL?  */
   SVN_TEST_ASSERT(validate_abspath(local_abspath, "J/J-e",
                                    work_del_abspath, pool));
+#else
+  SVN_TEST_ASSERT(work_del_abspath == NULL);
+#endif
 
   /* Base-deleted tree extending past added WORKING tree.  */
   SVN_ERR(svn_wc__db_scan_deletion(