You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "John Casey (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org> on 2008/07/02 20:15:26 UTC
[jira] Created: (MNG-3645) Maven doesn't do strict model validation
for POMs in the current reactor
Maven doesn't do strict model validation for POMs in the current reactor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: MNG-3645
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645
Project: Maven 2
Issue Type: Bug
Components: POM, Reactor and workspace
Affects Versions: 2.0.9
Reporter: John Casey
For example, adding a dependencyManagement section like the following doesn't result in a parser/validation error:
{code:xml}
<dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<groupId>org.group</groupId>
<artifactId>foo</artifactId>
<version>1</version>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>
{code}
Hint: It's missing the dependency element to contain the groupId/artifactId/version.
This is probably a duplicate, but if so it looks like the original is buried somewhere deep...I can't find it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Reopened: (MNG-3645) Maven doesn't do strict model
validation for POMs in the current reactor
Posted by "Benjamin Bentmann (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org>.
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Benjamin Bentmann reopened MNG-3645:
------------------------------------
Neither Maven 2.0.10-RC2, 2.1.0-M1 nor 3.0-SNAPSHOT are passing the corresponding IT. John, can you double check please?
> Maven doesn't do strict model validation for POMs in the current reactor
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-3645
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645
> Project: Maven 2
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: POM, Reactor and workspace
> Affects Versions: 2.0.9
> Reporter: John Casey
> Assignee: John Casey
> Fix For: 2.0.10, 2.1.0-M1
>
>
> For example, adding a dependencyManagement section like the following doesn't result in a parser/validation error:
> {code:xml}
> <dependencyManagement>
> <dependencies>
> <groupId>org.group</groupId>
> <artifactId>foo</artifactId>
> <version>1</version>
> </dependencies>
> </dependencyManagement>
> {code}
> Hint: It's missing the dependency element to contain the groupId/artifactId/version.
> This is probably a duplicate, but if so it looks like the original is buried somewhere deep...I can't find it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Closed: (MNG-3645) Maven doesn't do strict model validation
for POMs in the current reactor
Posted by "John Casey (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org>.
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
John Casey closed MNG-3645.
---------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> Maven doesn't do strict model validation for POMs in the current reactor
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-3645
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645
> Project: Maven 2
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: POM, Reactor and workspace
> Affects Versions: 2.0.9
> Reporter: John Casey
> Assignee: John Casey
> Fix For: 2.0.10
>
>
> For example, adding a dependencyManagement section like the following doesn't result in a parser/validation error:
> {code:xml}
> <dependencyManagement>
> <dependencies>
> <groupId>org.group</groupId>
> <artifactId>foo</artifactId>
> <version>1</version>
> </dependencies>
> </dependencyManagement>
> {code}
> Hint: It's missing the dependency element to contain the groupId/artifactId/version.
> This is probably a duplicate, but if so it looks like the original is buried somewhere deep...I can't find it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (MNG-3645) Maven doesn't do strict model validation
for POMs in the current reactor
Posted by "Herve Boutemy (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org>.
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Herve Boutemy updated MNG-3645:
-------------------------------
Affects Version/s: 2.0.5
2.0.8
> Maven doesn't do strict model validation for POMs in the current reactor
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-3645
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645
> Project: Maven 2
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: POM, Reactor and workspace
> Affects Versions: 2.0.5, 2.0.8, 2.0.9
> Reporter: John Casey
> Assignee: John Casey
> Fix For: 2.0.10, 2.1.0-M1
>
>
> For example, adding a dependencyManagement section like the following doesn't result in a parser/validation error:
> {code:xml}
> <dependencyManagement>
> <dependencies>
> <groupId>org.group</groupId>
> <artifactId>foo</artifactId>
> <version>1</version>
> </dependencies>
> </dependencyManagement>
> {code}
> Hint: It's missing the dependency element to contain the groupId/artifactId/version.
> This is probably a duplicate, but if so it looks like the original is buried somewhere deep...I can't find it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (MNG-3645) Maven doesn't do strict model
validation for POMs in the current reactor
Posted by "John Casey (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org>.
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=140259#action_140259 ]
John Casey commented on MNG-3645:
---------------------------------
Actually, this error traces all the way back to the generated xpp3 parser, which seems to be an issue of maven-model in 2.0.x being pegged to 1.0-alpha-8 of modello, where the rest of 2.0.x and 2.1 is currently on 1.0-alpha-18.
I'm investigating whether we can remove this exception for maven-model 2.0.x.
> Maven doesn't do strict model validation for POMs in the current reactor
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-3645
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645
> Project: Maven 2
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: POM, Reactor and workspace
> Affects Versions: 2.0.9
> Reporter: John Casey
> Assignee: John Casey
> Fix For: 2.0.10
>
>
> For example, adding a dependencyManagement section like the following doesn't result in a parser/validation error:
> {code:xml}
> <dependencyManagement>
> <dependencies>
> <groupId>org.group</groupId>
> <artifactId>foo</artifactId>
> <version>1</version>
> </dependencies>
> </dependencyManagement>
> {code}
> Hint: It's missing the dependency element to contain the groupId/artifactId/version.
> This is probably a duplicate, but if so it looks like the original is buried somewhere deep...I can't find it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (MNG-3645) Maven doesn't do strict model validation
for POMs in the current reactor
Posted by "Brett Porter (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org>.
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Brett Porter updated MNG-3645:
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.0-M1)
2.1.0-M2
it was fixed by upgrading to alpha-18 + of modello (which is now on 2.0.10 and 2.1.0-M2)
> Maven doesn't do strict model validation for POMs in the current reactor
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-3645
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645
> Project: Maven 2
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: POM, Reactor and workspace
> Affects Versions: 2.0.5, 2.0.8, 2.0.9
> Reporter: John Casey
> Assignee: John Casey
> Fix For: 2.0.10, 2.1.0-M2
>
>
> For example, adding a dependencyManagement section like the following doesn't result in a parser/validation error:
> {code:xml}
> <dependencyManagement>
> <dependencies>
> <groupId>org.group</groupId>
> <artifactId>foo</artifactId>
> <version>1</version>
> </dependencies>
> </dependencyManagement>
> {code}
> Hint: It's missing the dependency element to contain the groupId/artifactId/version.
> This is probably a duplicate, but if so it looks like the original is buried somewhere deep...I can't find it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (MNG-3645) Maven doesn't do strict model validation
for POMs in the current reactor
Posted by "John Casey (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org>.
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
John Casey updated MNG-3645:
----------------------------
Fix Version/s: 2.0.10
NOTE: This is not a problem in trunk / 2.1, probably because strict mode is always-on for projects build from the filesystem (i.e. not from a repository or local repository location).
> Maven doesn't do strict model validation for POMs in the current reactor
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-3645
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645
> Project: Maven 2
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: POM, Reactor and workspace
> Affects Versions: 2.0.9
> Reporter: John Casey
> Assignee: John Casey
> Fix For: 2.0.10
>
>
> For example, adding a dependencyManagement section like the following doesn't result in a parser/validation error:
> {code:xml}
> <dependencyManagement>
> <dependencies>
> <groupId>org.group</groupId>
> <artifactId>foo</artifactId>
> <version>1</version>
> </dependencies>
> </dependencyManagement>
> {code}
> Hint: It's missing the dependency element to contain the groupId/artifactId/version.
> This is probably a duplicate, but if so it looks like the original is buried somewhere deep...I can't find it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Closed: (MNG-3645) Maven doesn't do strict model validation
for POMs in the current reactor
Posted by "Brett Porter (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org>.
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Brett Porter closed MNG-3645.
-----------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> Maven doesn't do strict model validation for POMs in the current reactor
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-3645
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3645
> Project: Maven 2
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: POM, Reactor and workspace
> Affects Versions: 2.0.5, 2.0.8, 2.0.9
> Reporter: John Casey
> Assignee: John Casey
> Fix For: 2.0.10, 2.1.0-M2
>
>
> For example, adding a dependencyManagement section like the following doesn't result in a parser/validation error:
> {code:xml}
> <dependencyManagement>
> <dependencies>
> <groupId>org.group</groupId>
> <artifactId>foo</artifactId>
> <version>1</version>
> </dependencies>
> </dependencyManagement>
> {code}
> Hint: It's missing the dependency element to contain the groupId/artifactId/version.
> This is probably a duplicate, but if so it looks like the original is buried somewhere deep...I can't find it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira