You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Brett Porter (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org> on 2007/08/09 07:29:13 UTC
[jira] Commented: (MRM-462) separate configuration of managed
repositories from remote repositories
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_104381 ]
Brett Porter commented on MRM-462:
----------------------------------
some subtle issues this would address:
- https repositories get recognised as managed repositories (the path is set to ${appserver.home}/https:/...
- file URLs are overly picky and not compliant with the RFC for URLs
> separate configuration of managed repositories from remote repositories
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MRM-462
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-462
> Project: Archiva
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: web application
> Affects Versions: 1.0-beta-1
> Reporter: Brett Porter
> Priority: Critical
>
> the fancy footwork to make a managed repository use all the same configuration screens as a remote repository is causing both subtle bugs (particularly in the URL handling), and a confusing user experience (settings appearing that are irrelevant to remote repositories in the edit form).
> 1) separate the forms/actions (or at least exclude the fields that are not relevant when editing the remote repos)
> 2) treat the URL (remote) as a URL and the location (managed) as a path. Don't munge anything.
> 3) I think we should consider separating them into different lists in the configuration again.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira