You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by edward yoon <ed...@udanax.org> on 2008/02/14 03:55:35 UTC

@ command in shell.

I'd like to add @ command to run the specified command file.

Syntax
@ filename [arg...];
The arguments is used to replace some characters with some other
characters in a query string.

What do you think?
-- 
B. Regards,
Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.

Re: @ command in shell.

Posted by edward yoon <ed...@udanax.org>.

>> How is this different than the existing issue open for the "start"
command in HQL?

Same thing.

>> Why is it more advantageous to use @ than to take the
discussed stdin/stdout approach?

Is it unnecessary thing? If we want to run command file in application?

On 2/13/08, Bryan Duxbury <br...@rapleaf.com> wrote:
> How is this different than the existing issue open for the "start"
> command in HQL? Why is it more advantageous to use @ than to take the
> discussed stdin/stdout approach?
>
> -Bryan
>
> On Feb 13, 2008, at 6:55 PM, edward yoon wrote:
>
> > I'd like to add @ command to run the specified command file.
> >
> > Syntax
> > @ filename [arg...];
> > The arguments is used to replace some characters with some other
> > characters in a query string.
> >
> > What do you think?
> > --
> > B. Regards,
> > Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.
>
>


-- 
B. Regards,
Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.

Re: @ command in shell.

Posted by Bryan Duxbury <br...@rapleaf.com>.

How is this different than the existing issue open for the "start"  
command in HQL? Why is it more advantageous to use @ than to take the  
discussed stdin/stdout approach?

-Bryan

On Feb 13, 2008, at 6:55 PM, edward yoon wrote:

> I'd like to add @ command to run the specified command file.
>
> Syntax
> @ filename [arg...];
> The arguments is used to replace some characters with some other
> characters in a query string.
>
> What do you think?
> -- 
> B. Regards,
> Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.