You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Steven Zhen Wu (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/04/27 18:11:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-17421) Backpressure new checkpoints if
previous were not managed to be cleaned up yet
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17093792#comment-17093792 ]
Steven Zhen Wu commented on FLINK-17421:
----------------------------------------
what does "backpressure new checkpoints" mean? are we suggesting delaying the triggering of the next checkpoint.
In our setup, we only allows one concurrent checkpoint. I assume that this potential change doesn't matter to us?
> Backpressure new checkpoints if previous were not managed to be cleaned up yet
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-17421
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17421
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Runtime / Checkpointing
> Affects Versions: 1.7.2, 1.8.3, 1.9.3, 1.10.0
> Reporter: Piotr Nowojski
> Priority: Major
>
> As reported in FLINK-17073, ioExecutor might not manage to clean up checkpoints quickly enough causing ever growing memory consumption. A proposed solution would be to backpressure new checkpoints in that scenario.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)