You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by "Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)" <se...@james.apache.org> on 2006/05/11 17:57:05 UTC
[jira] Commented: (JAMES-490) Javamail 1.4 regression:
SocketFetcher changed to require SocketFactory implementation
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-490?page=comments#action_12379091 ]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-490:
---------------------------------------
One more note: SocketFetcher in 1.3.2 and 1.4 supports the usage of the "mail.smtp.localaddress" properties to specify a bind address. Maybe we don't need to use our local factory now.
> Javamail 1.4 regression: SocketFetcher changed to require SocketFactory implementation
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-490
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-490
> Project: James
> Type: Bug
> Components: Remote Delivery
> Versions: 2.3.0a2, 2.3.0a3
> Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
> Assignee: Stefano Bagnara
> Priority: Blocker
>
> The SocketFetcher used by Javamail 1.4 does no more use reflection to call the socket creation method on the SocketFactory provided. It instead cast the created object to SocketFactory.
> Out SocketFactory does not implement extends the SocketFactory class so it does not connect and fail to send mails.
> The socketFactory is only used when a bindAddress is specified, but this should be fixed asap.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org