You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@logging.apache.org by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> on 2022/01/07 12:48:05 UTC
Jira review
We have mentioned in the past going through Jiras in a meeting once in a
while. Does anyone still have to appetite for this review? Should we
schedule it?
Gary
Re: Jira review
Posted by Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org>.
The Log4cxx JIRA is pretty clean at the moment - Thorsten went through
it a few months ago so there's not much (if anything) to do there.
-Robert Middetlon
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 11:47 AM Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think this is a great idea. I'm sure we can find some dupes and link
> some other issues into existing epics along with other housekeeping.
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 8:26 AM Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> >
> > You mean Log4j 2 Jira issues. Yes, please. At least once a month. Possibly twice so
> > we can get through the backlog. If Log4cxx and Log4Net want to do something similar
> > I’m sure a few of us would be happy to help even though we may not know the code.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> > > On Jan 7, 2022, at 5:48 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > We have mentioned in the past going through Jiras in a meeting once in a
> > > while. Does anyone still have to appetite for this review? Should we
> > > schedule it?
> > >
> > > Gary
> >
Re: Jira review
Posted by Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>.
I think this is a great idea. I'm sure we can find some dupes and link
some other issues into existing epics along with other housekeeping.
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 8:26 AM Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> You mean Log4j 2 Jira issues. Yes, please. At least once a month. Possibly twice so
> we can get through the backlog. If Log4cxx and Log4Net want to do something similar
> I’m sure a few of us would be happy to help even though we may not know the code.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Jan 7, 2022, at 5:48 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > We have mentioned in the past going through Jiras in a meeting once in a
> > while. Does anyone still have to appetite for this review? Should we
> > schedule it?
> >
> > Gary
>
Re: Jira review
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
You mean Log4j 2 Jira issues. Yes, please. At least once a month. Possibly twice so
we can get through the backlog. If Log4cxx and Log4Net want to do something similar
I’m sure a few of us would be happy to help even though we may not know the code.
Ralph
> On Jan 7, 2022, at 5:48 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We have mentioned in the past going through Jiras in a meeting once in a
> while. Does anyone still have to appetite for this review? Should we
> schedule it?
>
> Gary