Re: @Jpf.SharedFlowField... not required

[Eddie O'Neil <ek...@bea.com>]

   Nope -- sounds good to me.

   Does that mean that we'll still have a default exception handler, though?

Eddie



Rich Feit wrote:
> All,
> 
> I would like to remove the 'sharedFlow' field from netui-blank's 
> Controller.java:
> 
>    @Jpf.SharedFlowField(name="shared")
>    private shared.SharedFlow sharedFlow;
> 
> I'd also like to delete everything in the docs that talks about it 
> except for the relevant section in the Shared Flow doc.  It's really a 
> more advanced feature (getting a hard reference to a shared flow 
> controller), and time and time again people have been convinced that you 
> need to have it in order to use Shared Flow.  I think this is because 
> it's there by default and in every doc/sample.
> 
> Any objections?
> 
> Rich

Re: @Jpf.SharedFlowField... not required

[Eddie O'Neil <ek...@gmail.com>]

  Ah, sorry -- I misread.  Sounds right to me.  

Eddie


On 9/6/05, Rich Feit <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, definitely -- it's just the (unused) hard reference that I'd be
> removing.
> 
> Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> 
> >
> >   Nope -- sounds good to me.
> >
> >   Does that mean that we'll still have a default exception handler,
> > though?
> >
> > Eddie
> >
> >
> >
> > Rich Feit wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>
> >> I would like to remove the 'sharedFlow' field from netui-blank's
> >> Controller.java:
> >>
> >>    @Jpf.SharedFlowField(name="shared")
> >>    private shared.SharedFlow sharedFlow;
> >>
> >> I'd also like to delete everything in the docs that talks about it
> >> except for the relevant section in the Shared Flow doc.  It's really
> >> a more advanced feature (getting a hard reference to a shared flow
> >> controller), and time and time again people have been convinced that
> >> you need to have it in order to use Shared Flow.  I think this is
> >> because it's there by default and in every doc/sample.
> >>
> >> Any objections?
> >>
> >> Rich
> >
> >
>

Re: @Jpf.SharedFlowField... not required

[Rich Feit <ri...@gmail.com>]

Yes, definitely -- it's just the (unused) hard reference that I'd be 
removing.

Eddie O'Neil wrote:

>
>   Nope -- sounds good to me.
>
>   Does that mean that we'll still have a default exception handler, 
> though?
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
> Rich Feit wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I would like to remove the 'sharedFlow' field from netui-blank's 
>> Controller.java:
>>
>>    @Jpf.SharedFlowField(name="shared")
>>    private shared.SharedFlow sharedFlow;
>>
>> I'd also like to delete everything in the docs that talks about it 
>> except for the relevant section in the Shared Flow doc.  It's really 
>> a more advanced feature (getting a hard reference to a shared flow 
>> controller), and time and time again people have been convinced that 
>> you need to have it in order to use Shared Flow.  I think this is 
>> because it's there by default and in every doc/sample.
>>
>> Any objections?
>>
>> Rich
>
>