You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Caroline (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/08/13 01:03:00 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-22823) Mark Canary as Public/Evolving

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Caroline reassigned HBASE-22823:
--------------------------------

    Assignee: Caroline

> Mark Canary as Public/Evolving
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-22823
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22823
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>            Assignee: Caroline
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Canary is marked as a Private class. Its interfaces could change at any time. Should we change the annotation on Canary to Public/Evolving? Or add annotations on some of these subtypes? I think it depends on how we think Canary results should be consumed.
> In our production we find that scraping logs and parsing them is brittle and not scalable. Although the scalability issue is more to do with the totality of logs from a Hadoopish stack, if you run HBase then you have this problem, and you wouldn't be using the canary if you didn't run HBase. We have a tool that embeds the Canary and calls various methods and takes actions without needing a round trip to the logs and whatever aggregates them.
> I propose we promote Canary to Public/Evolving. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)