You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@wicket.apache.org by "Johan Compagner (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/03/09 16:19:46 UTC

[jira] Commented: (WICKET-1358) Make Application Class More Bean-ish

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12576777#action_12576777 ] 

Johan Compagner commented on WICKET-1358:
-----------------------------------------

i think that change is fine but not for 1.3.x
lets do something like that for 1.4

> Make Application Class More Bean-ish
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WICKET-1358
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1358
>             Project: Wicket
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: wicket
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.1
>            Reporter: James Carman
>         Attachments: WICKET-1358.patch
>
>
> The Application class has getters for properties like applicationSettings and securitySettings.  Couldn't we make those properties writable also?  I realize that the internal implementation might have to change a bit.  Currently, the Settings class implements all of those interfaces and it uses a single instance of Settings by default.  The reason that I want this is so that I can set up my Application object in Spring and access it via wicket-spring.  The current implementation of Application doesn't facilitate the "set up" part very well.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.