You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Jay Kreps <ja...@gmail.com> on 2014/02/27 18:34:04 UTC
[VOTE] Metrics package for new clients
Hey all,
There was several previous discussions on metrics for the new clients but
I'm not sure had a unanimous consensus on the best approach. I'd put
forward the following options:
1. Plain vanilla JMX (no one actually wanted this, but for completeness...)
2. Improve on custom metrics package current on trunk
3. Coda Hale package
There are of course many other possibilities, but we didn't get a concrete
alternative so let's just vote on these and do one of them so we can keep
making progress.
For my part I am +1 for (2). I agree it is a bit of NIH, but I think the
advantages of the new code combined with the advantages of a no-deps client
are worth it.
-Jay
Re: [VOTE] Metrics package for new clients
Posted by Jay Kreps <ja...@gmail.com>.
The (2)'s have it. I will put up a patch using this approach.
-Jay
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Guozhang Wang <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on 2
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jay Kreps <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > There was several previous discussions on metrics for the new clients but
> > I'm not sure had a unanimous consensus on the best approach. I'd put
> > forward the following options:
> > 1. Plain vanilla JMX (no one actually wanted this, but for
> completeness...)
> > 2. Improve on custom metrics package current on trunk
> > 3. Coda Hale package
> >
> > There are of course many other possibilities, but we didn't get a
> concrete
> > alternative so let's just vote on these and do one of them so we can keep
> > making progress.
> >
> > For my part I am +1 for (2). I agree it is a bit of NIH, but I think the
> > advantages of the new code combined with the advantages of a no-deps
> client
> > are worth it.
> >
> > -Jay
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>
Re: [VOTE] Metrics package for new clients
Posted by Guozhang Wang <wa...@gmail.com>.
+1 on 2
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jay Kreps <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> There was several previous discussions on metrics for the new clients but
> I'm not sure had a unanimous consensus on the best approach. I'd put
> forward the following options:
> 1. Plain vanilla JMX (no one actually wanted this, but for completeness...)
> 2. Improve on custom metrics package current on trunk
> 3. Coda Hale package
>
> There are of course many other possibilities, but we didn't get a concrete
> alternative so let's just vote on these and do one of them so we can keep
> making progress.
>
> For my part I am +1 for (2). I agree it is a bit of NIH, but I think the
> advantages of the new code combined with the advantages of a no-deps client
> are worth it.
>
> -Jay
>
--
-- Guozhang
Re: [VOTE] Metrics package for new clients
Posted by Neha Narkhede <ne...@gmail.com>.
+1 for (2)
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly> wrote:
> +1 for (2)
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Jay Kreps <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > There was several previous discussions on metrics for the new clients but
> > I'm not sure had a unanimous consensus on the best approach. I'd put
> > forward the following options:
> > 1. Plain vanilla JMX (no one actually wanted this, but for
> completeness...)
> > 2. Improve on custom metrics package current on trunk
> > 3. Coda Hale package
> >
> > There are of course many other possibilities, but we didn't get a
> concrete
> > alternative so let's just vote on these and do one of them so we can keep
> > making progress.
> >
> > For my part I am +1 for (2). I agree it is a bit of NIH, but I think the
> > advantages of the new code combined with the advantages of a no-deps
> client
> > are worth it.
> >
> > -Jay
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Metrics package for new clients
Posted by Joe Stein <jo...@stealth.ly>.
+1 for (2)
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Jay Kreps <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> There was several previous discussions on metrics for the new clients but
> I'm not sure had a unanimous consensus on the best approach. I'd put
> forward the following options:
> 1. Plain vanilla JMX (no one actually wanted this, but for completeness...)
> 2. Improve on custom metrics package current on trunk
> 3. Coda Hale package
>
> There are of course many other possibilities, but we didn't get a concrete
> alternative so let's just vote on these and do one of them so we can keep
> making progress.
>
> For my part I am +1 for (2). I agree it is a bit of NIH, but I think the
> advantages of the new code combined with the advantages of a no-deps client
> are worth it.
>
> -Jay
>
Re: [VOTE] Metrics package for new clients
Posted by Jun Rao <ju...@gmail.com>.
+1 for (2).
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jay Kreps <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> There was several previous discussions on metrics for the new clients but
> I'm not sure had a unanimous consensus on the best approach. I'd put
> forward the following options:
> 1. Plain vanilla JMX (no one actually wanted this, but for completeness...)
> 2. Improve on custom metrics package current on trunk
> 3. Coda Hale package
>
> There are of course many other possibilities, but we didn't get a concrete
> alternative so let's just vote on these and do one of them so we can keep
> making progress.
>
> For my part I am +1 for (2). I agree it is a bit of NIH, but I think the
> advantages of the new code combined with the advantages of a no-deps client
> are worth it.
>
> -Jay
>