You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@maven.apache.org by Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> on 2005/12/19 22:08:18 UTC
groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven
Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId,
rather than "springframework".
If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the
groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following
warning:
[INFO] [resources:resources]
[INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
/spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
[WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
/maven2)
Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
ng-1.2.6.pom
[WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
/maven2)
If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as
springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom
files.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Matt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
file an issue (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV). jar is in correct directory but pom is missing.
Emmanuel
Matt Raible a écrit :
> I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven
> Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId,
> rather than "springframework".
>
> If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the
> groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following
> warning:
>
> [INFO] [resources:resources]
> [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> /maven2)
> Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> ng-1.2.6.pom
> [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> /maven2)
>
> If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as
> springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom
> files.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Posted by Stephen Duncan <st...@gmail.com>.
I think he's referring to the spring-mock POM. I think it's
dependencies on spring-web, spring-jdbc, javax.servlet:jsp-api should
probably all be optional as well. Not certain, as I haven't started
using spring-mock, but those sound optional to me...
-Stephen
On 12/22/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> The pom at ibiblio is fine, says that they're optional
> http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spring-1.2.6.pom
>
> I've used these dependencies and I only get commons-logging and spring
> jars in the web-inf lib
>
> On 12/22/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It's been over 24 hours and ibiblio still gives me cos and quartz for
> > Spring. Is the synchronization process broken? Here's my current pom:
> >
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > <scope>test</scope>
> > <exclusions>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > </exclusions>
> > </dependency>
> >
> >
> > On 12/21/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > I've put everything but commons-logging as optional. I think this is
> > > the last change for spring 1.2.6.
> > >
> > > On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now
> > > > > that they are maven tries to download them.
> > > >
> > > > The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that
> > > > everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the
> > > > only thing you need to run Spring.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything
> > > > > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency
> > > > > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars.
> > > >
> > > > It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I
> > > > didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I
> > > > have to have a bunch to get the same results.
> > > >
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>spring</artifactId>
> > > > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > > > <exclusions>
> > > > <exclusion>
> > > > <groupId>aopalliance</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>aopalliance</artifactId>
> > > > </exclusion>
> > > > <exclusion>
> > > > <groupId>com.servlets</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>cos</artifactId>
> > > > </exclusion>
> > > > <exclusion>
> > > > <groupId>quartz</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>quartz</artifactId>
> > > > </exclusion>
> > > > <exclusion>
> > > > <groupId>xdoclet</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>xjavadoc</artifactId>
> > > > </exclusion>
> > > > </exclusions>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > > <dependency>
> > > > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
> > > > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > > > <scope>test</scope>
> > > > <exclusions>
> > > > <exclusion>
> > > > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
> > > > </exclusion>
> > > > <exclusion>
> > > > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > > > <artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
> > > > </exclusion>
> > > > </exclusions>
> > > > </dependency>
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your help.
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using
> > > > > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now
> > > > > > neither works.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > required artifacts missing:
> > > > > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2
> > > > > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B
> > > > > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0
> > > > > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them soon.
> > > > > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the
> > > > > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the
> > > > > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven
> > > > > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId,
> > > > > > > > rather than "springframework".
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the
> > > > > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following
> > > > > > > > warning:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources]
> > > > > > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> > > > > > > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> > > > > > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> > > > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > > > > > /maven2)
> > > > > > > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> > > > > > > > ng-1.2.6.pom
> > > > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > > > > > /maven2)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> > > > > > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as
> > > > > > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom
> > > > > > > > files.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Any ideas?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
The pom at ibiblio is fine, says that they're optional
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spring-1.2.6.pom
I've used these dependencies and I only get commons-logging and spring
jars in the web-inf lib
On 12/22/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's been over 24 hours and ibiblio still gives me cos and quartz for
> Spring. Is the synchronization process broken? Here's my current pom:
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> <artifactId>spring</artifactId>
> <version>1.2.6</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> <artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
> <version>1.2.6</version>
> <scope>test</scope>
> <exclusions>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> <artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> <artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> </exclusions>
> </dependency>
>
>
> On 12/21/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I've put everything but commons-logging as optional. I think this is
> > the last change for spring 1.2.6.
> >
> > On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now
> > > > that they are maven tries to download them.
> > >
> > > The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that
> > > everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the
> > > only thing you need to run Spring.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything
> > > > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency
> > > > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars.
> > >
> > > It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I
> > > didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I
> > > have to have a bunch to get the same results.
> > >
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>spring</artifactId>
> > > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > > <exclusions>
> > > <exclusion>
> > > <groupId>aopalliance</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>aopalliance</artifactId>
> > > </exclusion>
> > > <exclusion>
> > > <groupId>com.servlets</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>cos</artifactId>
> > > </exclusion>
> > > <exclusion>
> > > <groupId>quartz</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>quartz</artifactId>
> > > </exclusion>
> > > <exclusion>
> > > <groupId>xdoclet</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>xjavadoc</artifactId>
> > > </exclusion>
> > > </exclusions>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
> > > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > > <scope>test</scope>
> > > <exclusions>
> > > <exclusion>
> > > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
> > > </exclusion>
> > > <exclusion>
> > > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
> > > </exclusion>
> > > </exclusions>
> > > </dependency>
> > >
> > > Thanks for your help.
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using
> > > > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now
> > > > > neither works.
> > > > >
> > > > > required artifacts missing:
> > > > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2
> > > > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B
> > > > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0
> > > > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were?
> > > > >
> > > > > Matt
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them soon.
> > > > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the
> > > > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the
> > > > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven
> > > > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId,
> > > > > > > rather than "springframework".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the
> > > > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following
> > > > > > > warning:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources]
> > > > > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> > > > > > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> > > > > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> > > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > > > > /maven2)
> > > > > > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> > > > > > > ng-1.2.6.pom
> > > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > > > > /maven2)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> > > > > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as
> > > > > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom
> > > > > > > files.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any ideas?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
springframework just points to org.springframework and you should
update your pom
On 12/22/05, Mick Knutson <mi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I am using just springframework, not org.springframework and it seems to
> work for me.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks
> Mick Knutson
>
> http://www.BASELogic.com
> http://www.MickKnutson.com
>
> MSN Messenger: mickknutson@hotmail.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matt Raible" <mr...@gmail.com>
> To: "Carlos Sanchez" <ca...@apache.org>
> Cc: "Maven Users List" <us...@maven.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 8:41 AM
> Subject: Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
>
>
> It's been over 24 hours and ibiblio still gives me cos and quartz for
> Spring. Is the synchronization process broken? Here's my current pom:
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> <artifactId>spring</artifactId>
> <version>1.2.6</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> <artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
> <version>1.2.6</version>
> <scope>test</scope>
> <exclusions>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> <artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> <artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> </exclusions>
> </dependency>
>
>
> On 12/21/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I've put everything but commons-logging as optional. I think this is
> > the last change for spring 1.2.6.
> >
> > On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now
> > > > that they are maven tries to download them.
> > >
> > > The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that
> > > everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the
> > > only thing you need to run Spring.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything
> > > > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency
> > > > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars.
> > >
> > > It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I
> > > didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I
> > > have to have a bunch to get the same results.
> > >
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>spring</artifactId>
> > > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > > <exclusions>
> > > <exclusion>
> > > <groupId>aopalliance</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>aopalliance</artifactId>
> > > </exclusion>
> > > <exclusion>
> > > <groupId>com.servlets</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>cos</artifactId>
> > > </exclusion>
> > > <exclusion>
> > > <groupId>quartz</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>quartz</artifactId>
> > > </exclusion>
> > > <exclusion>
> > > <groupId>xdoclet</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>xjavadoc</artifactId>
> > > </exclusion>
> > > </exclusions>
> > > </dependency>
> > > <dependency>
> > > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
> > > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > > <scope>test</scope>
> > > <exclusions>
> > > <exclusion>
> > > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
> > > </exclusion>
> > > <exclusion>
> > > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > > <artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
> > > </exclusion>
> > > </exclusions>
> > > </dependency>
> > >
> > > Thanks for your help.
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using
> > > > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now
> > > > > neither works.
> > > > >
> > > > > required artifacts missing:
> > > > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2
> > > > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B
> > > > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0
> > > > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were?
> > > > >
> > > > > Matt
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will
> > > > > > upload them soon.
> > > > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the
> > > > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the
> > > > > > > Maven
> > > > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's
> > > > > > > groupId,
> > > > > > > rather than "springframework".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the
> > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > warning:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources]
> > > > > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> > > > > > > Downloading:
> > > > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> > > > > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> > > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central
> > > > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > > > > /maven2)
> > > > > > > Downloading:
> > > > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> > > > > > > ng-1.2.6.pom
> > > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central
> > > > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > > > > /maven2)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> > > > > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as
> > > > > > > up-to-date as
> > > > > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing
> > > > > > > *.pom
> > > > > > > files.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any ideas?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Posted by Mick Knutson <mi...@hotmail.com>.
I am using just springframework, not org.springframework and it seems to
work for me.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks
Mick Knutson
http://www.BASELogic.com
http://www.MickKnutson.com
MSN Messenger: mickknutson@hotmail.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Raible" <mr...@gmail.com>
To: "Carlos Sanchez" <ca...@apache.org>
Cc: "Maven Users List" <us...@maven.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
It's been over 24 hours and ibiblio still gives me cos and quartz for
Spring. Is the synchronization process broken? Here's my current pom:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring</artifactId>
<version>1.2.6</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
<version>1.2.6</version>
<scope>test</scope>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
On 12/21/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've put everything but commons-logging as optional. I think this is
> the last change for spring 1.2.6.
>
> On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now
> > > that they are maven tries to download them.
> >
> > The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that
> > everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the
> > only thing you need to run Spring.
> >
> > >
> > > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything
> > > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency
> > > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars.
> >
> > It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I
> > didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I
> > have to have a bunch to get the same results.
> >
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > <exclusions>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>aopalliance</groupId>
> > <artifactId>aopalliance</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>com.servlets</groupId>
> > <artifactId>cos</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>quartz</groupId>
> > <artifactId>quartz</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>xdoclet</groupId>
> > <artifactId>xjavadoc</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > </exclusions>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > <scope>test</scope>
> > <exclusions>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > </exclusions>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using
> > > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now
> > > > neither works.
> > > >
> > > > required artifacts missing:
> > > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2
> > > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B
> > > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0
> > > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> > > >
> > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were?
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will
> > > > > upload them soon.
> > > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because
> > > > > the
> > > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the
> > > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the
> > > > > > Maven
> > > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's
> > > > > > groupId,
> > > > > > rather than "springframework".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the
> > > > > > following
> > > > > > warning:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources]
> > > > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> > > > > > Downloading:
> > > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> > > > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central
> > > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > > > /maven2)
> > > > > > Downloading:
> > > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> > > > > > ng-1.2.6.pom
> > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central
> > > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > > > /maven2)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> > > > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as
> > > > > > up-to-date as
> > > > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing
> > > > > > *.pom
> > > > > > files.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any ideas?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Posted by Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com>.
It's been over 24 hours and ibiblio still gives me cos and quartz for
Spring. Is the synchronization process broken? Here's my current pom:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring</artifactId>
<version>1.2.6</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
<version>1.2.6</version>
<scope>test</scope>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
On 12/21/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've put everything but commons-logging as optional. I think this is
> the last change for spring 1.2.6.
>
> On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now
> > > that they are maven tries to download them.
> >
> > The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that
> > everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the
> > only thing you need to run Spring.
> >
> > >
> > > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything
> > > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency
> > > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars.
> >
> > It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I
> > didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I
> > have to have a bunch to get the same results.
> >
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > <exclusions>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>aopalliance</groupId>
> > <artifactId>aopalliance</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>com.servlets</groupId>
> > <artifactId>cos</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>quartz</groupId>
> > <artifactId>quartz</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>xdoclet</groupId>
> > <artifactId>xjavadoc</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > </exclusions>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > <scope>test</scope>
> > <exclusions>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > </exclusions>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using
> > > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now
> > > > neither works.
> > > >
> > > > required artifacts missing:
> > > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2
> > > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B
> > > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0
> > > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> > > >
> > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were?
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them soon.
> > > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the
> > > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the
> > > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven
> > > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId,
> > > > > > rather than "springframework".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the
> > > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following
> > > > > > warning:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources]
> > > > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> > > > > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> > > > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > > > /maven2)
> > > > > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> > > > > > ng-1.2.6.pom
> > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > > > /maven2)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> > > > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as
> > > > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom
> > > > > > files.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any ideas?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Posted by Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com>.
I'm guessing this change will synch up with ibiblio in the next couple of hours?
spring-mock was fixed a couple of days ago - so if you included
"spring", then spring-mock didn't try to download spring-web and
spring-jdbc. The current (new) pom for spring-mock requires exclusion
of these artifacts.
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
<version>1.2.6</version>
<scope>test</scope>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
Or maybe spring-jdbc and spring-web need to be fixed so they don't
download everything they compile against. I know this is the point of
transitive dependencies, but Spring is a strange beast in that it
compiles against many libraries, but it doesn't require any of them to
run.
Matt
On 12/21/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've put everything but commons-logging as optional. I think this is
> the last change for spring 1.2.6.
>
> On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now
> > > that they are maven tries to download them.
> >
> > The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that
> > everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the
> > only thing you need to run Spring.
> >
> > >
> > > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything
> > > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency
> > > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars.
> >
> > It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I
> > didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I
> > have to have a bunch to get the same results.
> >
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > <exclusions>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>aopalliance</groupId>
> > <artifactId>aopalliance</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>com.servlets</groupId>
> > <artifactId>cos</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>quartz</groupId>
> > <artifactId>quartz</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>xdoclet</groupId>
> > <artifactId>xjavadoc</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > </exclusions>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
> > <version>1.2.6</version>
> > <scope>test</scope>
> > <exclusions>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > <exclusion>
> > <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> > <artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
> > </exclusion>
> > </exclusions>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using
> > > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now
> > > > neither works.
> > > >
> > > > required artifacts missing:
> > > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2
> > > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B
> > > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0
> > > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> > > >
> > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were?
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them soon.
> > > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the
> > > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the
> > > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven
> > > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId,
> > > > > > rather than "springframework".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the
> > > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following
> > > > > > warning:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources]
> > > > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> > > > > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> > > > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > > > /maven2)
> > > > > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> > > > > > ng-1.2.6.pom
> > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > > > /maven2)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> > > > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as
> > > > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom
> > > > > > files.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any ideas?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
I've put everything but commons-logging as optional. I think this is
the last change for spring 1.2.6.
On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now
> > that they are maven tries to download them.
>
> The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that
> everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the
> only thing you need to run Spring.
>
> >
> > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything
> > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency
> > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars.
>
> It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I
> didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I
> have to have a bunch to get the same results.
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> <artifactId>spring</artifactId>
> <version>1.2.6</version>
> <exclusions>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>aopalliance</groupId>
> <artifactId>aopalliance</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>com.servlets</groupId>
> <artifactId>cos</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>quartz</groupId>
> <artifactId>quartz</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>xdoclet</groupId>
> <artifactId>xjavadoc</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> </exclusions>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> <artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
> <version>1.2.6</version>
> <scope>test</scope>
> <exclusions>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> <artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> <exclusion>
> <groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
> <artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
> </exclusion>
> </exclusions>
> </dependency>
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Matt
>
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using
> > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now
> > > neither works.
> > >
> > > required artifacts missing:
> > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2
> > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B
> > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0
> > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> > >
> > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were?
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them soon.
> > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the
> > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the
> > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven
> > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId,
> > > > > rather than "springframework".
> > > > >
> > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the
> > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following
> > > > > warning:
> > > > >
> > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources]
> > > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> > > > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> > > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > > /maven2)
> > > > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> > > > > ng-1.2.6.pom
> > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > > /maven2)
> > > > >
> > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> > > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as
> > > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom
> > > > > files.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any ideas?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Matt
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Posted by Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com>.
On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now
> that they are maven tries to download them.
The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that
everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the
only thing you need to run Spring.
>
> I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything
> should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency
> features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars.
It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I
didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I
have to have a bunch to get the same results.
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring</artifactId>
<version>1.2.6</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>aopalliance</groupId>
<artifactId>aopalliance</artifactId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<groupId>com.servlets</groupId>
<artifactId>cos</artifactId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<groupId>quartz</groupId>
<artifactId>quartz</artifactId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<groupId>xdoclet</groupId>
<artifactId>xjavadoc</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-mock</artifactId>
<version>1.2.6</version>
<scope>test</scope>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-jdbc</artifactId>
</exclusion>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-web</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
Thanks for your help.
Matt
>
> Regards
>
> On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using
> > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now
> > neither works.
> >
> > required artifacts missing:
> > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2
> > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B
> > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0
> > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> >
> > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were?
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them soon.
> > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the
> > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the
> > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven
> > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId,
> > > > rather than "springframework".
> > > >
> > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the
> > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following
> > > > warning:
> > > >
> > > > [INFO] [resources:resources]
> > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> > > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > /maven2)
> > > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> > > > ng-1.2.6.pom
> > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > /maven2)
> > > >
> > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as
> > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom
> > > > files.
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now
that they are maven tries to download them.
I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything
should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency
features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars.
Regards
On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using
> springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now
> neither works.
>
> required artifacts missing:
> javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2
> javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B
> javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0
> javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
>
> Is it possible to revert things back to what they were?
>
> Matt
>
> On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them soon.
> > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the
> > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the
> > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven
> > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId,
> > > rather than "springframework".
> > >
> > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the
> > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following
> > > warning:
> > >
> > > [INFO] [resources:resources]
> > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > /maven2)
> > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> > > ng-1.2.6.pom
> > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > /maven2)
> > >
> > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as
> > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom
> > > files.
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com>.
I've been reminded that this is exactly the problem - these are
supposed to be optional.
Sorry!
- Brett
On 12/21/05, Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Isn't this just because those artifacts are not in your local
> repository and must be installed manually?
>
> They were possibly installed under the other groupIds previously.
>
> - Brett
>
> On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using
> > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now
> > neither works.
> >
> > required artifacts missing:
> > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2
> > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B
> > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0
> > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> >
> > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were?
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them soon.
> > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the
> > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the
> > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven
> > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId,
> > > > rather than "springframework".
> > > >
> > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the
> > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following
> > > > warning:
> > > >
> > > > [INFO] [resources:resources]
> > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> > > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > /maven2)
> > > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> > > > ng-1.2.6.pom
> > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > > /maven2)
> > > >
> > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as
> > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom
> > > > files.
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com>.
Isn't this just because those artifacts are not in your local
repository and must be installed manually?
They were possibly installed under the other groupIds previously.
- Brett
On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using
> springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now
> neither works.
>
> required artifacts missing:
> javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2
> javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B
> javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0
> javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
>
> Is it possible to revert things back to what they were?
>
> Matt
>
> On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them soon.
> > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the
> > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the
> > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven
> > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId,
> > > rather than "springframework".
> > >
> > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the
> > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following
> > > warning:
> > >
> > > [INFO] [resources:resources]
> > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > /maven2)
> > > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> > > ng-1.2.6.pom
> > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > > /maven2)
> > >
> > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as
> > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom
> > > files.
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Posted by Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com>.
Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using
springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now
neither works.
required artifacts missing:
javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2
javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B
javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0
javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
Is it possible to revert things back to what they were?
Matt
On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them soon.
> The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the
> poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the
> org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms.
>
> Regards
>
> On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven
> > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId,
> > rather than "springframework".
> >
> > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the
> > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following
> > warning:
> >
> > [INFO] [resources:resources]
> > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > /maven2)
> > Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> > ng-1.2.6.pom
> > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> > /maven2)
> >
> > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as
> > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom
> > files.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi,
I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them soon.
The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the
poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the
org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms.
Regards
On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven
> Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId,
> rather than "springframework".
>
> If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the
> groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following
> warning:
>
> [INFO] [resources:resources]
> [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6
> /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom
> [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> /maven2)
> Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri
> ng-1.2.6.pom
> [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org
> /maven2)
>
> If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any
> warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as
> springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom
> files.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@maven.apache.org