You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Colin Scott (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/22 21:11:04 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-6028) Provide an alternative RPC
implementation based on the network transport module
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14637443#comment-14637443 ]
Colin Scott edited comment on SPARK-6028 at 7/22/15 7:10 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Curious: does this new RPC implementation use TCP as its underlying transport protocol, or UDP? In other words, does the underlying transport protocol guarantee in-order delivery between hosts?
(I believe akka-remote uses TCP by default.)
Thanks!
was (Author: colin_scott):
Curious: does this new RPC implementation use TCP as its underlying transport protocol, or UDP?
(I believe akka-remote uses TCP by default.)
> Provide an alternative RPC implementation based on the network transport module
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-6028
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6028
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Spark Core
> Reporter: Reynold Xin
> Priority: Critical
>
> Network transport module implements a low level RPC interface. We can build a new RPC implementation on top of that to replace Akka's.
> Design document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CF5G6rGVQMKSyV_QKo4D2M-x6rxz5x1Ew7aK3Uq6u8c/edit?usp=sharing
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org