You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Stefan Fuhrmann <st...@apache.org> on 2016/10/12 19:24:22 UTC

Status review for 1.8.17 and 1.9.5

Hi there,

There are a number of backport proposals that only need
one more +1. Since the Berlin hackathon is going on and
we feel like preparing the next patch release(s) soon-ish,
please review and vote.

-- Stefan^2.

Re: Status review for 1.8.17 and 1.9.5

Posted by Stefan Fuhrmann <st...@apache.org>.
On 12.10.2016 22:22, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann <st...@apache.org> writes:
>
>> There are a number of backport proposals that only need one more +1.
>> Since the Berlin hackathon is going on and we feel like preparing the
>> next patch release(s) soon-ish, please review and vote.
> I plan to roll 1.9.5 after the hackathon.
+1.
>    Any reason why we might also
> want to prepare 1.8.17?  I don't think that we had any security or critical
> bugfixes in the 1.8.x branch.
Nothing really critical, IIRC. But it has been 6 months
by now with no bugfix release. So, it would be nice
to demonstrate that 1.8.x is still being supported ...

-- Stefan^2.

Re: Status review for 1.8.17 and 1.9.5

Posted by Evgeny Kotkov <ev...@visualsvn.com>.
Stefan Fuhrmann <st...@apache.org> writes:

> There are a number of backport proposals that only need one more +1.
> Since the Berlin hackathon is going on and we feel like preparing the
> next patch release(s) soon-ish, please review and vote.

I plan to roll 1.9.5 after the hackathon.  Any reason why we might also
want to prepare 1.8.17?  I don't think that we had any security or critical
bugfixes in the 1.8.x branch.


Regards,
Evgeny Kotkov