You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Stefan Fuhrmann <st...@apache.org> on 2016/10/12 19:24:22 UTC
Status review for 1.8.17 and 1.9.5
Hi there,
There are a number of backport proposals that only need
one more +1. Since the Berlin hackathon is going on and
we feel like preparing the next patch release(s) soon-ish,
please review and vote.
-- Stefan^2.
Re: Status review for 1.8.17 and 1.9.5
Posted by Stefan Fuhrmann <st...@apache.org>.
On 12.10.2016 22:22, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann <st...@apache.org> writes:
>
>> There are a number of backport proposals that only need one more +1.
>> Since the Berlin hackathon is going on and we feel like preparing the
>> next patch release(s) soon-ish, please review and vote.
> I plan to roll 1.9.5 after the hackathon.
+1.
> Any reason why we might also
> want to prepare 1.8.17? I don't think that we had any security or critical
> bugfixes in the 1.8.x branch.
Nothing really critical, IIRC. But it has been 6 months
by now with no bugfix release. So, it would be nice
to demonstrate that 1.8.x is still being supported ...
-- Stefan^2.
Re: Status review for 1.8.17 and 1.9.5
Posted by Evgeny Kotkov <ev...@visualsvn.com>.
Stefan Fuhrmann <st...@apache.org> writes:
> There are a number of backport proposals that only need one more +1.
> Since the Berlin hackathon is going on and we feel like preparing the
> next patch release(s) soon-ish, please review and vote.
I plan to roll 1.9.5 after the hackathon. Any reason why we might also
want to prepare 1.8.17? I don't think that we had any security or critical
bugfixes in the 1.8.x branch.
Regards,
Evgeny Kotkov