You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hive.apache.org by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> on 2013/08/13 19:02:37 UTC
Proposing a 0.11.1
All,
I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to put
together a release candidate over the next week. I'm in the process of
putting together the list of bugs that I want to include, but I wanted to
solicit the jiras that others though would be important for an 0.11.1.
Thanks,
Owen
Re: Proposing a 0.11.1
Posted by Eric Chu <ec...@rocketfuel.com>.
Hi,
We recently tried to upgrade to Hive 0.11 from 0.10 and noticed we needed
to add patches for the following JIRAs to make Hive 0.11 work:
- HIVE-4619. None of our MR queries worked without it
- HIVE-4003. We ran into this bug in 0.10 also
- Data Nucleus-related: At first we were only trying to get rid of the
Data Nucleus error messages, but one Jira led to another, and we ended up
upgrading Data Nucleus with the following:
- HIVE-4900, HIVE-3632, HIVE-4942 (and then do ant very-clean to
clean up old version of Data Nucleus)
- HIVE-4647
On a separate note:
- HIVE-5149. This bug made us revert to Hive-0.10 b/c at the time we
didn't know what's wrong. See email titled "DISTRIBUTE BY works incorrectly
in Hive 0.11 in some cases", which led to the creation of HIVE-5149. The
proposed workaround works but as we noted there we still need the right
fix. The property hive.optimize.reducededuplication already existed in
Hive 0.10 so this is a regression.
Thanks,
Eric
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> I haven't made any progress on it yet. I hope to make progress on it
> this week. I will certainly include the npath changes. On a separate
> thread, I'll start a discussion about starting to lock down 0.12.0.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Mark Grover <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> > Any update on this? We are considering including Hive 0.11* in Bigtop 0.7
> > and it would be very useful and much appreciated to get a little more
> > context into what the Hive 0.11.1 release would look like.
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I am fealing more like we should release a 12.0 rather then backport
> > things
> > > into 11.X.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Navis류승우 <na...@nexr.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If this is only for addressing npath problem, we got three months for
> > > that.
> > > >
> > > > Would it be enough time for releasing 0.12.0?
> > > >
> > > > ps. IMHO, n-path seemed too generic name to be patented. I hate
> > Teradata.
> > > >
> > > > 2013/8/14 Edward Capriolo <ed...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Should we get the npath rename in? Do we have a jira for this? If
> > not I
> > > > > will take it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Mark Wagner <
> > wagner.mark.d@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> It'd be good to get both HIVE-3953 and HIVE-4789 in there. 3953
> has
> > > been
> > > > >> committed to trunk and it looks like 4789 is close.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >> Mark
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Owen O'Malley <
> omalley@apache.org
> > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > All,
> > > > >> > I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to
> > put
> > > > >> > together a release candidate over the next week. I'm in the
> > process
> > > of
> > > > >> > putting together the list of bugs that I want to include, but I
> > > > wanted to
> > > > >> > solicit the jiras that others though would be important for an
> > > 0.11.1.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > >> > Owen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Proposing a 0.11.1
Posted by Mark Grover <ma...@apache.org>.
Hi Owen,
Sounds good. Thanks for the update!
Mark
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> I haven't made any progress on it yet. I hope to make progress on it
> this week. I will certainly include the npath changes. On a separate
> thread, I'll start a discussion about starting to lock down 0.12.0.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Mark Grover <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> > Any update on this? We are considering including Hive 0.11* in Bigtop 0.7
> > and it would be very useful and much appreciated to get a little more
> > context into what the Hive 0.11.1 release would look like.
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I am fealing more like we should release a 12.0 rather then backport
> > things
> > > into 11.X.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Navis류승우 <na...@nexr.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If this is only for addressing npath problem, we got three months for
> > > that.
> > > >
> > > > Would it be enough time for releasing 0.12.0?
> > > >
> > > > ps. IMHO, n-path seemed too generic name to be patented. I hate
> > Teradata.
> > > >
> > > > 2013/8/14 Edward Capriolo <ed...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Should we get the npath rename in? Do we have a jira for this? If
> > not I
> > > > > will take it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Mark Wagner <
> > wagner.mark.d@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> It'd be good to get both HIVE-3953 and HIVE-4789 in there. 3953
> has
> > > been
> > > > >> committed to trunk and it looks like 4789 is close.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >> Mark
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Owen O'Malley <
> omalley@apache.org
> > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > All,
> > > > >> > I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to
> > put
> > > > >> > together a release candidate over the next week. I'm in the
> > process
> > > of
> > > > >> > putting together the list of bugs that I want to include, but I
> > > > wanted to
> > > > >> > solicit the jiras that others though would be important for an
> > > 0.11.1.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > >> > Owen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Proposing a 0.11.1
Posted by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>.
Hi Mark,
I haven't made any progress on it yet. I hope to make progress on it
this week. I will certainly include the npath changes. On a separate
thread, I'll start a discussion about starting to lock down 0.12.0.
-- Owen
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Mark Grover <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Any update on this? We are considering including Hive 0.11* in Bigtop 0.7
> and it would be very useful and much appreciated to get a little more
> context into what the Hive 0.11.1 release would look like.
>
> Thanks in advance!
> Mark
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I am fealing more like we should release a 12.0 rather then backport
> things
> > into 11.X.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Navis류승우 <na...@nexr.com> wrote:
> >
> > > If this is only for addressing npath problem, we got three months for
> > that.
> > >
> > > Would it be enough time for releasing 0.12.0?
> > >
> > > ps. IMHO, n-path seemed too generic name to be patented. I hate
> Teradata.
> > >
> > > 2013/8/14 Edward Capriolo <ed...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Should we get the npath rename in? Do we have a jira for this? If
> not I
> > > > will take it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Mark Wagner <
> wagner.mark.d@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> It'd be good to get both HIVE-3953 and HIVE-4789 in there. 3953 has
> > been
> > > >> committed to trunk and it looks like 4789 is close.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Mark
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Owen O'Malley <omalley@apache.org
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > All,
> > > >> > I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to
> put
> > > >> > together a release candidate over the next week. I'm in the
> process
> > of
> > > >> > putting together the list of bugs that I want to include, but I
> > > wanted to
> > > >> > solicit the jiras that others though would be important for an
> > 0.11.1.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > Owen
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: Proposing a 0.11.1
Posted by Mark Grover <ma...@apache.org>.
Hi folks,
Any update on this? We are considering including Hive 0.11* in Bigtop 0.7
and it would be very useful and much appreciated to get a little more
context into what the Hive 0.11.1 release would look like.
Thanks in advance!
Mark
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Edward Capriolo <ed...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I am fealing more like we should release a 12.0 rather then backport things
> into 11.X.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Navis류승우 <na...@nexr.com> wrote:
>
> > If this is only for addressing npath problem, we got three months for
> that.
> >
> > Would it be enough time for releasing 0.12.0?
> >
> > ps. IMHO, n-path seemed too generic name to be patented. I hate Teradata.
> >
> > 2013/8/14 Edward Capriolo <ed...@gmail.com>:
> > > Should we get the npath rename in? Do we have a jira for this? If not I
> > > will take it.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Mark Wagner <wagner.mark.d@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> It'd be good to get both HIVE-3953 and HIVE-4789 in there. 3953 has
> been
> > >> committed to trunk and it looks like 4789 is close.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Mark
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > All,
> > >> > I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to put
> > >> > together a release candidate over the next week. I'm in the process
> of
> > >> > putting together the list of bugs that I want to include, but I
> > wanted to
> > >> > solicit the jiras that others though would be important for an
> 0.11.1.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Owen
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>
Re: Proposing a 0.11.1
Posted by Edward Capriolo <ed...@gmail.com>.
I am fealing more like we should release a 12.0 rather then backport things
into 11.X.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Navis류승우 <na...@nexr.com> wrote:
> If this is only for addressing npath problem, we got three months for that.
>
> Would it be enough time for releasing 0.12.0?
>
> ps. IMHO, n-path seemed too generic name to be patented. I hate Teradata.
>
> 2013/8/14 Edward Capriolo <ed...@gmail.com>:
> > Should we get the npath rename in? Do we have a jira for this? If not I
> > will take it.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Mark Wagner <wagner.mark.d@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> It'd be good to get both HIVE-3953 and HIVE-4789 in there. 3953 has been
> >> committed to trunk and it looks like 4789 is close.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mark
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > All,
> >> > I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to put
> >> > together a release candidate over the next week. I'm in the process of
> >> > putting together the list of bugs that I want to include, but I
> wanted to
> >> > solicit the jiras that others though would be important for an 0.11.1.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Owen
> >> >
> >>
>
Re: Proposing a 0.11.1
Posted by Navis류승우 <na...@nexr.com>.
If this is only for addressing npath problem, we got three months for that.
Would it be enough time for releasing 0.12.0?
ps. IMHO, n-path seemed too generic name to be patented. I hate Teradata.
2013/8/14 Edward Capriolo <ed...@gmail.com>:
> Should we get the npath rename in? Do we have a jira for this? If not I
> will take it.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Mark Wagner <wa...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> It'd be good to get both HIVE-3953 and HIVE-4789 in there. 3953 has been
>> committed to trunk and it looks like 4789 is close.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mark
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > All,
>> > I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to put
>> > together a release candidate over the next week. I'm in the process of
>> > putting together the list of bugs that I want to include, but I wanted to
>> > solicit the jiras that others though would be important for an 0.11.1.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Owen
>> >
>>
Re: Proposing a 0.11.1
Posted by Edward Capriolo <ed...@gmail.com>.
Should we get the npath rename in? Do we have a jira for this? If not I
will take it.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Mark Wagner <wa...@gmail.com>wrote:
> It'd be good to get both HIVE-3953 and HIVE-4789 in there. 3953 has been
> committed to trunk and it looks like 4789 is close.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> > I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to put
> > together a release candidate over the next week. I'm in the process of
> > putting together the list of bugs that I want to include, but I wanted to
> > solicit the jiras that others though would be important for an 0.11.1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Owen
> >
>
Re: Proposing a 0.11.1
Posted by Mark Wagner <wa...@gmail.com>.
It'd be good to get both HIVE-3953 and HIVE-4789 in there. 3953 has been
committed to trunk and it looks like 4789 is close.
Thanks,
Mark
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to put
> together a release candidate over the next week. I'm in the process of
> putting together the list of bugs that I want to include, but I wanted to
> solicit the jiras that others though would be important for an 0.11.1.
>
> Thanks,
> Owen
>
Re: Proposing a 0.11.1
Posted by Mark Grover <ma...@apache.org>.
+ dev@bigtop.apache.org
Hi Owen,
I work on Apache Bigtop <http://bigtop.apache.org> and we were recently
discussing<http://search-hadoop.com/m/A8Jne2SAnHq1/bigtop+0.7+bom&subj=Re+DISCUSS+BOM+for+release+0+7+0+of+Bigtop>inclusion
of Hive 0.11 in the next release of Bigtop - Bigtop 0.7. However,
we learned during that discussion that there is a request to remove the
NPath UDF from Hive code (ASF Board minutes available
here<http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2013/board_minutes_2013_06_19.txt>
).
I was wondering if Hive 0.11.1 release would address that? Or, if a later
Hive release would or if the Hive PMC has determined that there is no issue
to be addressed afterall?
Thanks!
Mark
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Can I suggest to include
> HIVE-3772 (performance fix; committed to trunk)
> HIVE-4583 (OpenJDK7 support; all subtasks seem to be done)
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> > All,
> > I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to put
> > together a release candidate over the next week. I'm in the process of
> > putting together the list of bugs that I want to include, but I wanted to
> > solicit the jiras that others though would be important for an 0.11.1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Owen
>
Re: Proposing a 0.11.1
Posted by Mark Grover <ma...@apache.org>.
+ dev@bigtop.apache.org
Hi Owen,
I work on Apache Bigtop <http://bigtop.apache.org> and we were recently
discussing<http://search-hadoop.com/m/A8Jne2SAnHq1/bigtop+0.7+bom&subj=Re+DISCUSS+BOM+for+release+0+7+0+of+Bigtop>inclusion
of Hive 0.11 in the next release of Bigtop - Bigtop 0.7. However,
we learned during that discussion that there is a request to remove the
NPath UDF from Hive code (ASF Board minutes available
here<http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2013/board_minutes_2013_06_19.txt>
).
I was wondering if Hive 0.11.1 release would address that? Or, if a later
Hive release would or if the Hive PMC has determined that there is no issue
to be addressed afterall?
Thanks!
Mark
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Can I suggest to include
> HIVE-3772 (performance fix; committed to trunk)
> HIVE-4583 (OpenJDK7 support; all subtasks seem to be done)
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> > All,
> > I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to put
> > together a release candidate over the next week. I'm in the process of
> > putting together the list of bugs that I want to include, but I wanted to
> > solicit the jiras that others though would be important for an 0.11.1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Owen
>
Re: Proposing a 0.11.1
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Hi.
Can I suggest to include
HIVE-3772 (performance fix; committed to trunk)
HIVE-4583 (OpenJDK7 support; all subtasks seem to be done)
Thanks,
Cos
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:02AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> I'd like to create an 0.11.1 with some fixes in it. I plan to put
> together a release candidate over the next week. I'm in the process of
> putting together the list of bugs that I want to include, but I wanted to
> solicit the jiras that others though would be important for an 0.11.1.
>
> Thanks,
> Owen